Moderator: Community Team
Stroop wrote:F1fth wrote:Natewolfman wrote:I agree who we lynch is very relivent... im not voting yet as i have not seen a good reason to lynch anyone given yet... and at what PCM said, why are we voting for Stroop? i dont remember reading anything that marks him as a killer, unless i missed something?
The better question is why not? Unless he's on your side of course...
But as for a reason to at least get a claim out of him, how about because we have no other leads, and if we let this go we'll have nothing else to do.
Ani's reaction to only one vote is not a lead?
I think I'll claim then. I am a Kroot, a Tau Goon.
F1fth wrote:@Nate -- a Tau is a faction and they are not more dangerous, but equally dangerous. You people need to get this through your heads: IF THEY ARE NOT IN YOUR FACTION, WHETHER YOU BE THIRD PARTY OR FACTION, THEY NEED TO KILL YOU TO WIN AND YOU NEED TO SEE THEM KILLED TO WIN. Is that not reason enough?
Stroop wrote:F1fth wrote:@Nate -- a Tau is a faction and they are not more dangerous, but equally dangerous. You people need to get this through your heads: IF THEY ARE NOT IN YOUR FACTION, WHETHER YOU BE THIRD PARTY OR FACTION, THEY NEED TO KILL YOU TO WIN AND YOU NEED TO SEE THEM KILLED TO WIN. Is that not reason enough?
No, it's an absolute bullshit reason as you can advocate anyone's lynch with that. You want me lynched, specifically, so stop using such reasons...
drake_259 wrote:Vote: F1fth
You are not in my fraction and you seem to be very onwards with this lynch,
Stroop wrote:F1fth wrote:@Nate -- a Tau is a faction and they are not more dangerous, but equally dangerous. You people need to get this through your heads: IF THEY ARE NOT IN YOUR FACTION, WHETHER YOU BE THIRD PARTY OR FACTION, THEY NEED TO KILL YOU TO WIN AND YOU NEED TO SEE THEM KILLED TO WIN. Is that not reason enough?
No, it's an absolute bullshit reason as you can advocate anyone's lynch with that. You want me lynched, specifically, so stop using such reasons...
F1fth wrote:He said he was a goon. Goon as in member of a mafia. Members of a mafia always have a kill as long as one of them remains.
/ wrote:F1fth wrote:He said he was a goon. Goon as in member of a mafia. Members of a mafia always have a kill as long as one of them remains.
So are you saying we should lynch the members of dying factions with top priority, so the entire faction has no night kill?
dunc_2007 wrote:I think we should definitely weaken the strongest factions as best as we can. Otherwise, the second one faction begins to pull ahead, all these unaffiliated doctors we keep hearing so much about will hop on board with them, and glide into victory.
Natewolfman wrote:dunc_2007 wrote:I think we should definitely weaken the strongest factions as best as we can. Otherwise, the second one faction begins to pull ahead, all these unaffiliated doctors we keep hearing so much about will hop on board with them, and glide into victory.
thats a very good point...
as ive been thinking, there are three ways to play this
1) eliminate a whole group which was suggested
2) even out the groups, in other words groups that havnt lost anyone yet is who we should go for, or make sure we take 2 from every group evenly
3) try and take out the docs and the 'town' type players before they bandwagon with a specfic group, and gives that group absolute power
dunc_2007 wrote:Natewolfman wrote:dunc_2007 wrote:I think we should definitely weaken the strongest factions as best as we can. Otherwise, the second one faction begins to pull ahead, all these unaffiliated doctors we keep hearing so much about will hop on board with them, and glide into victory.
thats a very good point...
as ive been thinking, there are three ways to play this
1) eliminate a whole group which was suggested
2) even out the groups, in other words groups that havnt lost anyone yet is who we should go for, or make sure we take 2 from every group evenly
3) try and take out the docs and the 'town' type players before they bandwagon with a specfic group, and gives that group absolute power
That's an interesting idea, actually. What do others think about this idea?
animorpherv1 wrote:dunc_2007 wrote:Natewolfman wrote:dunc_2007 wrote:I think we should definitely weaken the strongest factions as best as we can. Otherwise, the second one faction begins to pull ahead, all these unaffiliated doctors we keep hearing so much about will hop on board with them, and glide into victory.
thats a very good point...
as ive been thinking, there are three ways to play this
1) eliminate a whole group which was suggested
2) even out the groups, in other words groups that havnt lost anyone yet is who we should go for, or make sure we take 2 from every group evenly
3) try and take out the docs and the 'town' type players before they bandwagon with a specfic group, and gives that group absolute power
That's an interesting idea, actually. What do others think about this idea?
I say no.
I promise I will not choose a side, as I have no clue who is on what side, or what side is winnig, because I never heard of Dwan of War untill the game was announced.
Stroop wrote:F1fth wrote:@Nate -- a Tau is a faction and they are not more dangerous, but equally dangerous. You people need to get this through your heads: IF THEY ARE NOT IN YOUR FACTION, WHETHER YOU BE THIRD PARTY OR FACTION, THEY NEED TO KILL YOU TO WIN AND YOU NEED TO SEE THEM KILLED TO WIN. Is that not reason enough?
No, it's an absolute bullshit reason as you can advocate anyone's lynch with that. You want me lynched, specifically, so stop using such reasons...
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users