Moderator: Community Team
kalishnikov wrote:So if you guys all believe him why aren't you unvoting?![]()
I'm not sure what to make of this mess right yet, some re-reading needs to be done on my part before I make a call one way or the other but I thought I vaguely recall animo voting for Stroop day 1 (which would be odd if then protected him that night) but again I'm not sure on that and unfortunately I don't have time to go back right now so for the time being my vote will stand pending further review of the case.
drake_259 wrote:thats probably because he wasn't mafia
drake_259 wrote:although i think ani is telling the truth this time, for him i think he would have claimed he was part of Aceria Forest rather than Hyperian Peaks
dunc_2007 wrote:drake_259 wrote:although i think ani is telling the truth this time, for him i think he would have claimed he was part of Aceria Forest rather than Hyperian Peaks
I'm not really sure where this little assumption came from.
F1fth wrote:But Ani, with that last post were you trying to say that you know you're in a group or is that just speculation?
Stroop wrote:dunc_2007 wrote:drake_259 wrote:although i think ani is telling the truth this time, for him i think he would have claimed he was part of Aceria Forest rather than Hyperian Peaks
I'm not really sure where this little assumption came from.
Apparently ani's intelligence is questioned and drake thinks ani would think of Aceria Forest as a faction.
Stroop wrote:kalishnikov wrote:I'm not sure what to make of this mess right yet, some re-reading needs to be done on my part before I make a call one way or the other but I thought I vaguely recall animo voting for Stroop day 1 (which would be odd if then protected him that night) but again I'm not sure on that and unfortunately I don't have time to go back right now so for the time being my vote will stand pending further review of the case.
He says he protected /, not me.
william18 wrote:I beleive animorphs claim, and the fact that their are also other governers out their or other third parties.
The set-up is probably 7 groups of 3 to insure all teams are even, and 7 third party members, that way we have people without strict agenda's making a reasonable impact in the game.
F1fth wrote:Not really. We don't know how many kill actions were sent in or who the doctors protected, and besides, I figure if they are all doctors quite a few of them didn't send an action in. Think about it: their role is to survive. Protecting someone else would only extend the game and possible prevent a faction member that might otherwise kill them from getting offed.
I'm not saying it's for certain, but I wouldn't be surprised if we have a ton of doctors in this game.
animorpherv1 wrote:F1fth wrote:Not really. We don't know how many kill actions were sent in or who the doctors protected, and besides, I figure if they are all doctors quite a few of them didn't send an action in. Think about it: their role is to survive. Protecting someone else would only extend the game and possible prevent a faction member that might otherwise kill them from getting offed.
I'm not saying it's for certain, but I wouldn't be surprised if we have a ton of doctors in this game.
ga7 even admittied to doing most of those kills, too.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
spurgistan wrote:animorpherv1 wrote:F1fth wrote:Not really. We don't know how many kill actions were sent in or who the doctors protected, and besides, I figure if they are all doctors quite a few of them didn't send an action in. Think about it: their role is to survive. Protecting someone else would only extend the game and possible prevent a faction member that might otherwise kill them from getting offed.
I'm not saying it's for certain, but I wouldn't be surprised if we have a ton of doctors in this game.
ga7 even admittied to doing most of those kills, too.
That was the ga7 that died. Granted, while the fact that ga7 was allowed back in to the game might tell us something about his last role (actually, now that I think about it, doesn't replacing a dead player back in effectively give a new player info that nobody else could have?)
spurgistan wrote:That was the ga7 that died. Granted, while the fact that ga7 was allowed back in to the game might tell us something about his last role (actually, now that I think about it, doesn't replacing a dead player back in effectively give a new player info that nobody else could have?)
Thezzaruz wrote:spurgistan wrote:That was the ga7 that died. Granted, while the fact that ga7 was allowed back in to the game might tell us something about his last role (actually, now that I think about it, doesn't replacing a dead player back in effectively give a new player info that nobody else could have?)
No it doesn't seeing as he didn't replace in this game (where info had been skewed) but did it in the Am Revolution game where his first role didn't know anything that wasn't public already...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users