Conquer Club

More fodder for you liberals.....

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby jay_a2j on Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:14 am

heavycola wrote:And no, using oil-based carriers to allow ingredients to be absorbed by the skin isn't speculation, jay.



Are you saying YOU have gotten high off of canibas based oil? You would think if it were possible the oil would be a hot seller!


Its speculation.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby heavycola on Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:31 am

no, we roll cannabis up and smoke it. or bake it into cookies.

why would anyone bother to leave it in olive oil for weeks and then pour it over themselves?

"Then the Lord said to Moses, "Take the following fine spices: 500 shekels of liquid myrrh, half as much of fragrant cinnamon, 250 shekels of qaneh-bosm, 500 shekels of cassia--all according to the sanctuary shekel--and a hind of olive oil. Make these into a sacred anointing oil� (Exodus 30: 22-33).

As one shekel equals approximately 16.37 grams, this means that the THC [active ingredient in cannabis] of over 9 pounds of flowering cannabis tops were extracted into a hind, about 6.5 litres of oil. The entheogenic effects of such a solution -­ even when applied topically - ­would undoubtedly have been intense. "

From the research of Dr Sula Benet, later confirmed by the Hebrew University in jerusalem:

"In 1980, a wave of interest in Benet's work prompted numerous etymologists to agree with Benet's reinterpretation of the word qaneh-bosm in Exodus. That year, scholars at Jerusalem¹s Hebrew University confirmed her work, noting that the q¹aneh-bosm was mistranslated in the King James version of Exodus 30:23 as 'calamus' (Latimer, 1988). That same year, Weston La Barre also confirmed Benet's work, noting further that "the term kaneh-bosm occurs as early as both the Aramaic and the Hebrew versions of the Old Testament, hemp being used for rope in Solomon's temple and in priestly robes, as well as carried in Biblical caravans" In 1980, the slightly cynical scholar Allegro also noted that this "volatile substance in the heat of an enclosed oracular chamber would contribute to the delusion of omniscience through their intoxicating effect" (Allegro 1980)."
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby jay_a2j on Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:06 pm

heavycola wrote:no, we roll cannabis up and smoke it. or bake it into cookies.

why would anyone bother to leave it in olive oil for weeks and then pour it over themselves?

"Then the Lord said to Moses, "Take the following fine spices: 500 shekels of liquid myrrh, half as much of fragrant cinnamon, 250 shekels of qaneh-bosm, 500 shekels of cassia--all according to the sanctuary shekel--and a hind of olive oil. Make these into a sacred anointing oil� (Exodus 30: 22-33).

As one shekel equals approximately 16.37 grams, this means that the THC [active ingredient in cannabis] of over 9 pounds of flowering cannabis tops were extracted into a hind, about 6.5 litres of oil. The entheogenic effects of such a solution -­ even when applied topically - ­would undoubtedly have been intense. "

From the research of Dr Sula Benet, later confirmed by the Hebrew University in jerusalem:

"In 1980, a wave of interest in Benet's work prompted numerous etymologists to agree with Benet's reinterpretation of the word qaneh-bosm in Exodus. That year, scholars at Jerusalem¹s Hebrew University confirmed her work, noting that the q¹aneh-bosm was mistranslated in the King James version of Exodus 30:23 as 'calamus' (Latimer, 1988). That same year, Weston La Barre also confirmed Benet's work, noting further that "the term kaneh-bosm occurs as early as both the Aramaic and the Hebrew versions of the Old Testament, hemp being used for rope in Solomon's temple and in priestly robes, as well as carried in Biblical caravans" In 1980, the slightly cynical scholar Allegro also noted that this "volatile substance in the heat of an enclosed oracular chamber would contribute to the delusion of omniscience through their intoxicating effect" (Allegro 1980)."



*takes a hit and passes it to heavycola>>>>> :roll:
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby mightyal on Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:37 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
heavycola wrote:And no, using oil-based carriers to allow ingredients to be absorbed by the skin isn't speculation, jay.



Are you saying YOU have gotten high off of canibas based oil? You would think if it were possible the oil would be a hot seller!


Its speculation.
Purchased, produced, smoked, got very, very high off - yes. Hash oil is a scientific fact.
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
- Galileo Galilei
User avatar
Captain mightyal
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:33 pm
Location: Banging the hag whilst Owl is busy banging hendy's mum

Postby Backglass on Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:11 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
heavycola wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:First of all can anyone confirm by firsthand experiance that you can get high off of oil made from canibas? This seems rediculous to me. I have never gotten high after eating poppy seeds.


Opium is made from poppies, not poppy seeds, and has nothing to do with cannabis. The active ingredient in cannbis can be dissolved in oil and absorbed through the skin. How else do you think jesus and his follower dudes saw all that crazy shit?




I'll ask again for a firsthand account. This is speculation..... it would be thrown out in court.


Jay, jay jay...How do you think Nicotine patches work? Which by the way you should really check into. .;)

jay_a2j wrote:*takes a hit and passes it to heavycola>>>>> Rolling Eyes


In other words, he has no response, is backed into a corner (again) so he places his hands over his ears and starts singing loudly.

Just ignore the facts jay...maybe they will go away. ;)
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby KoolBak on Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:09 pm

Ruthless......
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."

Neil Young....Like An Inca

AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
User avatar
Private 1st Class KoolBak
 
Posts: 7374
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest

Postby MeDeFe on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:05 pm

You mean the oil, right?
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Postby KoolBak on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:07 pm

:lol:

No I mean the savage "debate".....
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."

Neil Young....Like An Inca

AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
User avatar
Private 1st Class KoolBak
 
Posts: 7374
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest

Postby MeDeFe on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:26 pm

We haven't debated any savages, have we?
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Postby KoolBak on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:34 pm

*substitute noun with adjective*
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."

Neil Young....Like An Inca

AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
User avatar
Private 1st Class KoolBak
 
Posts: 7374
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest

Postby MeDeFe on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:36 pm

like... "intelligent bastard"?
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Postby KoolBak on Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:39 pm

That sonuds more like an oxymoron or a waste of good brain power...

I believe you know I was referring to "savage" as a descriptive term for the "chitchat", not as a subject that was being debated :wink:

So are you German?
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."

Neil Young....Like An Inca

AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
User avatar
Private 1st Class KoolBak
 
Posts: 7374
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest

Postby stinkycheese on Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:50 pm

jay_a2j wrote:I'll ask again for a firsthand account. This is speculation..... it would be thrown out in court.


Care to reply to this post?

trestain wrote:actually jay yes, after every crop we always turn the cabbage(the outer leaves stalks, anything except the bud)into cannabis oil, it is actually more potent than the bud if it is distilled properley.
User avatar
Captain stinkycheese
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Postby jay_a2j on Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:58 pm

Backglass wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
heavycola wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:First of all can anyone confirm by firsthand experiance that you can get high off of oil made from canibas? This seems rediculous to me. I have never gotten high after eating poppy seeds.


Opium is made from poppies, not poppy seeds, and has nothing to do with cannabis. The active ingredient in cannbis can be dissolved in oil and absorbed through the skin. How else do you think jesus and his follower dudes saw all that crazy shit?




I'll ask again for a firsthand account. This is speculation..... it would be thrown out in court.


Jay, jay jay...How do you think Nicotine patches work? Which by the way you should really check into. .;)

jay_a2j wrote:*takes a hit and passes it to heavycola>>>>> Rolling Eyes


In other words, he has no response, is backed into a corner (again) so he places his hands over his ears and starts singing loudly.

Just ignore the facts jay...maybe they will go away. ;)



I'll reply to this one.... Nicotine patches are designed to work that way. Note: if I rub tobacco on my arm it will have no effect. :roll:
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby happysadfun on Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:09 am

How did the copying in of a conservative chain letter turn into a debate over whether Jesus used marijuana?
ImageChildren, this is what happens to hockey players, druggies, and Hillary Clinton.

Rope. Tree. Hillary. Some assembly required.
User avatar
Cadet happysadfun
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Haundin at DotSco, Being Sad that Mark Green Lost in Suburban Wisconsin

Postby jay_a2j on Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:06 am

happysadfun wrote:How did the copying in of a conservative chain letter turn into a debate over whether Jesus used marijuana?



They are tring to justify smoking pot by making crazy alligations that Jesus "got high" off of oil made from canibas. By doing this, they pervert who Jesus is and come off looking foolish. :wink:
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby Backglass on Sat Dec 09, 2006 2:44 pm

jay_a2j wrote:They are tring to justify smoking pot by making crazy alligations that Jesus "got high" off of oil made from canibas. By doing this, they pervert who Jesus is and come off looking foolish. :wink:


I could care less about some guy in ancient times getting high. Many herbs were used for medicinal purposes back in the day (and today).

I took issue with jay's statement: "Pot is far more dangerouse than cigarrettes".

Which is blatently false.

jay_a2j wrote:I'll reply to this one.... Nicotine patches are designed to work that way. Note: if I rub tobacco on my arm it will have no effect.


Stay on course jay! Nobody said anything about rubbing leaves on ones skin.

Let me refresh your memory. We were talking about macerating herbs, particularly Marijuana, in oil. Which when applied to the skin would give the user the drugs effects. You doubted this would work. I stated this is in fact how Nicotine patches work...then you post THAT left-turn post. :roll:

Jay...if you were to take Tobacco, soak the leaves in oil, then rub that oil onto your skin, you would indeed have made your own low-potency nicotine patch.

Since you have no reply, feel free to ignore this post as you usually do. ;)
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby reverend_kyle on Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:22 pm

happysadfun wrote:How did the copying in of a conservative chain letter turn into a debate over whether Jesus used marijuana?


Conservatives dont know how to direct debate.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
Sergeant reverend_kyle
 
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club

Postby Stopper on Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:38 pm

Backglass wrote:I could care less about...etc


This is completely irrelevant, but this still disorientates me. I assume "I could care less" in America means the same as "I couldn't care less" in Britain? Why do you people have it precisely the wrong way around?

If you could care less, presumably you DO care?
User avatar
Lieutenant Stopper
 
Posts: 2244
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 5:14 am
Location: Supposed to be working...

Postby reverend_kyle on Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:39 pm

Stopper wrote:
Backglass wrote:I could care less about...etc


This is completely irrelevant, but this still disorientates me. I assume "I could care less" in America means the same as "I couldn't care less" in Britain? Why do you people have it precisely the wrong way around?

If you could care less, presumably you DO care?


I like that.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
Sergeant reverend_kyle
 
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club

Postby vtmarik on Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:40 pm

Stopper wrote:
Backglass wrote:I could care less about...etc


This is completely irrelevant, but this still disorientates me. I assume "I could care less" in America means the same as "I couldn't care less" in Britain? Why do you people have it precisely the wrong way around?

If you could care less, presumably you DO care?


In America the two terms are interchangeable and mean the same thing. It all boils down to personal preference at that point.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
Cadet vtmarik
 
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.

Postby Backglass on Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:47 pm

vtmarik wrote:
Stopper wrote:
Backglass wrote:I could care less about...etc


This is completely irrelevant, but this still disorientates me. I assume "I could care less" in America means the same as "I couldn't care less" in Britain? Why do you people have it precisely the wrong way around?

If you could care less, presumably you DO care?


In America the two terms are interchangeable and mean the same thing. It all boils down to personal preference at that point.


It works both ways. I am still trying to figure out exactly what a "sod" is or what one is doing while "sodding". In the US, sod is what you put down in front of your house to make a nice lawn. :lol:

SOD
Image
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby Stopper on Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:03 pm

Backglass wrote:
vtmarik wrote:
Stopper wrote:
Backglass wrote:I could care less about...etc


This is completely irrelevant, but this still disorientates me. I assume "I could care less" in America means the same as "I couldn't care less" in Britain? Why do you people have it precisely the wrong way around?

If you could care less, presumably you DO care?


In America the two terms are interchangeable and mean the same thing. It all boils down to personal preference at that point.


OK...I'll accept that, though I'm not convinced I've seen an American say "couldn't" on the internet before...Hmmm... It's just I've this feeling that, like so many other US expressions, I'm gonna find myself adopting this in everyday speech, and I won't remember why...lol


Backglass wrote:It works both ways. I am still trying to figure out exactly what a "sod" is or what one is doing while "sodding". In the US, sod is what you put down in front of your house to make a nice lawn. :lol:

SOD


Yes, well, here, there's probably a sod or two I'd like to see put down, but I'll probably do sod all about it. :wink:
User avatar
Lieutenant Stopper
 
Posts: 2244
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 5:14 am
Location: Supposed to be working...

Postby vtmarik on Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:45 pm

Backglass wrote:It works both ways. I am still trying to figure out exactly what a "sod" is or what one is doing while "sodding". In the US, sod is what you put down in front of your house to make a nice lawn. :lol:

SOD
Image


Sod is a nice way of saying f*ck, and it has about as many uses.

f*ck Off <-> Sod Off
You fucking f*ck! <-> You Sodding sod!

The only one that doesn't work is f*ck you <-> sod you.

Did I get it right Stopper?
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
Cadet vtmarik
 
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.

Postby DogDoc on Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:08 pm

Stopper wrote:
Backglass wrote:I could care less about...etc


This is completely irrelevant, but this still disorientates me. I assume "I could care less" in America means the same as "I couldn't care less" in Britain? Why do you people have it precisely the wrong way around?

If you could care less, presumably you DO care?


Precisely. This is one of my pet peeves as well. It should be "I couldn't care less." Also, people really need to get "its" and "it's" straight. Its is a possessive pronoun. It's is a contraction for it is. And alright is not all right. And what the hell does "irregardless" mean, anyway? Regardless, it's regardless, dammit. I could go on but will let you Brits take over as the English language police from here.
WARNING: The light at the end of the tunnel is a train.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DogDoc
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:13 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users