Sierra_Leon wrote:Iliad wrote:Sierra_Leon wrote:I guess I'll translate that "LOL WUT" into my own words then:Iliad wrote:I don't like how you go on the offensive and shift the attention straight to me as soon as I try to suggest we try a path other than yours. I won't stand for it
unvote vote Sierra
- What offensive? Is asking someone to actually contribute to the game and place a non-random vote considered 'going on the offensive? Especially if that person just posted that we should pursue a non-random lynch?
- What's wrong with a little attention? I'm getting plenty at the moment and I'm not complaining.
- You don't agree with me that lynching Mandy, who claimed vig, is a bad idea? Or are you referring to another path?
I was talking about the whole random day 1 lynch thing. This whole thing was started by me saying maybe we don't have to randomly lynch someone.
I take it you're answering the blue question there. I still don't see the logic behind your reasoning. Here's what I read into the discussion from mandy's claim up until your vote:me - "I don't think we should lynch mandy. random vote militant."
you - "I don't think we should lynch randomly."
me - "That sounds good. Lead the way."
you - "OMG what are you looking at me for?! vote sierra"
As far as I can tell, I was very much on the same path as you were. So I don't see your point where you say "as soon as I try to suggest we try a path other than yours".
It would be nice if you replied to the red and purple questions too.
If you didn't see I was having a bit of a joke. I was just trying to find a pretext for voting you. Ask for a vote and you shall receive. It was a joke