Moderator: Community Team
suggs wrote:I would just celebrate the cultural diversity of London. Its great.
l3eater wrote:My friend told me that some Islamic bookstores sub as a place of worship for Muslims. That way it's mobbed on Sundays.
bbqpenguin wrote:you should be able to worship whatever you want, wherever you want. what the hell does it matter to you if they're praying in a bookstore? you thing the government should have the power to tell you where you can and can't worship?
Pedronicus wrote:Down the road from my house is an 'Islamic Bookshop'
In amongst some regular shops, a hairdressers, a Pizza hut delivery / takeaway shop, a sunbed shop etc, is the 'Islamic Bookshop'.
Now I live in an East London borough and ethnics abound, and a hell of a lot work for the council.
If it's just a 'bookshop', why is it that children of the same age all leave at the same time, not clutching a book of any description? on a Sunday - it's mobbed. It's obviously not a bookshop, but it's far easier to get a shop and call it a shop, rather than go through the red tape of applying to start a place of worship.
My question to the intelligent English members of this forum - what can I do to complain to my council about this flagrant abuse of non planning application?
GabonX wrote:If something is zoned as a store and it isn't generating the money that a store would it is hurting the tax payers, aka everyone. I couldn't tell you how to get through to the authorities in London but as suggested, fire is probably a more direct approach.
GabonX wrote:If something is zoned as a store and it isn't generating the money that a store would it is hurting the tax payers, aka everyone. I couldn't tell you how to get through to the authorities in London but as suggested, fire is probably a more direct approach.
bbqpenguin wrote:you should be able to worship whatever you want, wherever you want. what the hell does it matter to you if they're praying in a bookstore? you thing the government should have the power to tell you where you can and can't worship?
Pedronicus wrote:I'm not opposed to the fact that this country operates a freedom of religion policy. I would have liked to have been asked if I minded a local shop being converted into a place of worship, which is what happens during planning application.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Pedronicus wrote:I'm not opposed to the fact that this country operates a freedom of religion policy. I would have liked to have been asked if I minded a local shop being converted into a place of worship, which is what happens during planning application.
There, I fixed your grammar. Please, do not mutilate the english language like that any more, maybe you pronounce the words 'of' and 'have' identically, but that is no reason to use them interchangeably when writing.
Juan_Bottom wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Pedronicus wrote:I'm not opposed to the fact that this country operates a freedom of religion policy. I would have liked to have been asked if I minded a local shop being converted into a place of worship, which is what happens during planning application.
There, I fixed your grammar. Please, do not mutilate the english language like that any more, maybe you pronounce the words 'of' and 'have' identically, but that is no reason to use them interchangeably when writing.
Man, you are a grammer Nazi.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Juan_Bottom wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Pedronicus wrote:I'm not opposed to the fact that this country operates a freedom of religion policy. I would have liked to have been asked if I minded a local shop being converted into a place of worship, which is what happens during planning application.
There, I fixed your grammar. Please, do not mutilate the english language like that any more, maybe you pronounce the words 'of' and 'have' identically, but that is no reason to use them interchangeably when writing.
Man, you is a grammer Nazi.
Nickbaldwin wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Pedronicus wrote:I'm not opposed to the fact that this country operates a freedom of religion policy. I would have liked to have been asked if I minded a local shop being converted into a place of worship, which is what happens during planning application.
There, I fixed your grammar. Please, do not mutilate the english language like that any more, maybe you pronounce the words 'of' and 'have' identically, but that is no reason to use them interchangeably when writing.
Man, you is a grammer Nazi.
Grammar.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Nickbaldwin wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Pedronicus wrote:I'm not opposed to the fact that this country operates a freedom of religion policy. I would have liked to have been asked if I minded a local shop being converted into a place of worship, which is what happens during planning application.
There, I fixed your grammar. Please, do not mutilate the english language like that any more, maybe you pronounce the words 'of' and 'have' identically, but that is no reason to use them interchangeably when writing.
Man, you is a grammer Nazi.
Grammar.
Thank you, I missed that one. Quite sneaky of Juan to hide a spelling mistake by committing a grave grammatical one.
Pedronicus wrote:My main gripe is that if I want to do a loft conversion, I have to go through Planning Application and Building Control and have someone on the council agree to my loft conversion. If I convert it myself and don't tell the council, they can make me demolish all the work and return my roof space to original spec.
I'm sure that if the Local Muslims wanted to apply to build a mosque or convert a shop into a place of worship, they would also have to go through planning application.
They evidently haven't and I'm sick and tired of 4-500 people suddenly turning up in my street to pick up or drop off people that need to whip out a prayer mat and point at Mecca for an hour or two. Traffic is a nightmare. On certain days it's like living on Baghdad High Street, with Burqas and beards as far as the eye can see.
If someone else were to buy a shop and turn it into an unlicenced bar - the council would be down on them like a ton of bricks.
I'm sick of the double standards that the London Borough of Waltham Forest uses.
I'm not opposed to the fact that this country operates a freedom of religion policy. I would of like to of been asked if I minded if a local shop being converted into a place of worship, which is what happens during planning application.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users