Who's more 'cool'?

by **brooksieb** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 7:53 am

The police on the west coast or the 'gangsters' on the west coast.

It's gotta be the police because quite frankly they're the best gang in town.

by **Dancing Mustard** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:33 am

The Popo.

by **muy_thaiguy** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:07 am

Just hearsay, but I heard that the Police in Cali (SoCal at least) have horrible aim. Got into a gunfight with a bank robber or some such, and missed him almost every time they shot at him.

by **DAZMCFC** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:04 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:Just hearsay, but I heard that the Police in Cali (SoCal at least) have horrible aim. Got into a gunfight with a bank robber or some such, and missed him almost every time they shot at him.

maybe they missed on purpose. if you shoot or kill someone, you'd have to do a shit load of paper work and some of the dibble could be shit at typing. :roll:

by **muy_thaiguy** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:24 pm

DAZMCFC wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Just hearsay, but I heard that the Police in Cali (SoCal at least) have horrible aim. Got into a gunfight with a bank robber or some such, and missed him almost every time they shot at him.

maybe they missed on purpose. if you shoot or kill someone, you'd have to do a shit load of paper work and some of the dibble could be shit at typing.

The guy they were shooting at had body armor, a semi-automatic rifle, and shooting anything and everything that moved.

by **Snorri1234** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:26 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
DAZMCFC wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Just hearsay, but I heard that the Police in Cali (SoCal at least) have horrible aim. Got into a gunfight with a bank robber or some such, and missed him almost every time they shot at him.

maybe they missed on purpose. if you shoot or kill someone, you'd have to do a shit load of paper work and some of the dibble could be shit at typing.

The guy they were shooting at had body armor, a semi-automatic rifle, and shooting anything and everything that moved.

Are you sure it wasn't an action-movie?

by **InkL0sed** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:28 pm

Don't you know action movies are accurate representations of real life?

by **muy_thaiguy** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:29 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
DAZMCFC wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Just hearsay, but I heard that the Police in Cali (SoCal at least) have horrible aim. Got into a gunfight with a bank robber or some such, and missed him almost every time they shot at him.

maybe they missed on purpose. if you shoot or kill someone, you'd have to do a shit load of paper work and some of the dibble could be shit at typing.

The guy they were shooting at had body armor, a semi-automatic rifle, and shooting anything and everything that moved.

Are you sure it wasn't an action-movie?

Unless Hollywood has started using street light and security cameras for filming movies, I'm pretty sure it was real.

by **Nickbaldwin** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:30 pm

no no no love for the po po.

by **DAZMCFC** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:32 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
DAZMCFC wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Just hearsay, but I heard that the Police in Cali (SoCal at least) have horrible aim. Got into a gunfight with a bank robber or some such, and missed him almost every time they shot at him.

maybe they missed on purpose. if you shoot or kill someone, you'd have to do a shit load of paper work and some of the dibble could be shit at typing.

The guy they were shooting at had body armor, a semi-automatic rifle, and shooting anything and everything that moved.

Are you sure it wasn't an action-movie?

Unless Hollywood has started using street light and security cameras for filming movies, I'm pretty sure it was real.

= sarcasm please get use to this.

by **muy_thaiguy** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:32 pm

Ma'am, yes ma'am.

by **strike wolf** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:33 pm

The guy they were shooting at had armor piercing bullets that tore through police cars and the officers wearing body armor on the other side from a range much farther than what the police guns were capable of. Now you tell me, how were they supposed to get this guy?

by **DAZMCFC** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:34 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:Ma'am, yes ma'am.

now bend over while i get my cane out.

by **muy_thaiguy** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:37 pm

strike wolf wrote:The guy they were shooting at had armor piercing bullets that tore through police cars and the officers wearing body armor on the other side from a range much farther than what the police guns were capable of. Now you tell me, how were they supposed to get this guy?

I assume they were trying to, though it goes to show, it may not hurt to have sniper teams in the more "troublesome" precincts for cases like this.

DAZMCFC wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Ma'am, yes ma'am.

now bend over while i get my cane out.

I want the cat and 9 tails! [-X

by **strike wolf** on Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:56 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
strike wolf wrote:The guy they were shooting at had armor piercing bullets that tore through police cars and the officers wearing body armor on the other side from a range much farther than what the police guns were capable of. Now you tell me, how were they supposed to get this guy?

I assume they were trying to, though it goes to show, it may not hurt to have sniper teams in the more "troublesome" precincts for cases like this.

Yes they should have had a sniper but your original point was that their accuracy sucked and they had horrible aim and couldn't get the guy.

Who's more 'cool'?

Who's more cool?

Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Re: Who's more 'cool'?

Who is online