Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:If it makes you feel any better, I don't think we have enough mass nearby to create a black hole.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
DaGip wrote:Neoteny wrote:If it makes you feel any better, I don't think we have enough mass nearby to create a black hole.
Perhaps you don't need mass nearby.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:DaGip wrote:Neoteny wrote:If it makes you feel any better, I don't think we have enough mass nearby to create a black hole.
Perhaps you don't need mass nearby.
Well, in that case, we're probably fucked. Who's joining in my August orgy?
Physicist Martin Rees, left, receiving an award in 2005, estimates the chance of the particle smasher creating a global catastrophe at one in 50 million, about the same odds as winning some lotteries.
wrestler1ump wrote:Physicist Martin Rees, left, receiving an award in 2005, estimates the chance of the particle smasher creating a global catastrophe at one in 50 million, about the same odds as winning some lotteries.
So we will take the same chance as we have at winning the lottery that we will engulf our world into nothingness with the flip of a switch? It will probably take less than a second for the world to be engulfed in the black hole, meaning we won't have any time to save ourselves once we f*ck up.
DaGip wrote:Neoteny wrote:If it makes you feel any better, I don't think we have enough mass nearby to create a black hole.
Perhaps you don't need mass nearby.
Ditocoaf wrote::roll:
you have a far better chance of killing yourself just by getting into a car, yet billions of people drive every day.DaGip wrote:Neoteny wrote:If it makes you feel any better, I don't think we have enough mass nearby to create a black hole.
Perhaps you don't need mass nearby.
yes, yes you do. A black hole does not exist without an unimaginable amount of mass very densely packed in the same region of spce.
Seriously; if you don't at the very least know what quarks and leptons are, then you shouldn't even begin to think about the cost/benifit analysis of this. If you can name them all twelve (so far?) off the top of your head, then you're a little bit better off. And if you're far beyond that (I wouldn't have a clue what that entails), then you're at the point where you're qualified to discuss whether this is dangerous or not.
Face it: Not one of us have anywhere near the knowledge requisite to have the slightest clue what it is they're actually doing. Yet somehow you've all decided that it's too much of a risk? Go back to discussing whether gay people choose to feel attraction or not.
wrestler1ump wrote:Physicist Martin Rees, left, receiving an award in 2005, estimates the chance of the particle smasher creating a global catastrophe at one in 50 million, about the same odds as winning some lotteries.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Has DaGip predicted something happening in August? If he hasn't I don't think anything will happen at all.
Juan_Bottom wrote:People win the lottery all the time. Only this time, it's the Deathottery....
Snorri1234 wrote:Yes, but that is because you can easily take 50 million people to play a lottery. It's not like we're suddenly going to do this 50 million times in a row.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
suggs wrote:Cern is one of the great modern wonders of the world (in my opinion, and in anyone's who thinks that discovering more about our planet/the universe is useful/interesting).
Typical of the conspiricacy idiots to point the finger at one of the few good things going on in the world atm.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Ditocoaf wrote::roll:
you have a far better chance of killing yourself just by getting into a car, yet billions of people drive every day.DaGip wrote:Perhaps you don't need mass nearby.
yes, yes you do. A black hole does not exist without an unimaginable amount of mass very densely packed in the same region of spce.
Seriously; if you don't at the very least know what quarks and leptons are, then you shouldn't even begin to think about the cost/benifit analysis of this. If you can name them all twelve (so far?) off the top of your head, then you're a little bit better off. And if you're far beyond that (I wouldn't have a clue what that entails), then you're at the point where you're qualified to discuss whether this is dangerous or not.
Face it: Not one of us have anywhere near the knowledge requisite to have the slightest clue what it is they're actually doing. Yet somehow you've all decided that it's too much of a risk? Go back to discussing whether gay people choose to feel attraction or not.
Don't act retarded. They already dumbed it down for us. If they didn't want us to call it too much of a risk they should have kept things all sciencey and stuff like that....
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Ditocoaf wrote:AOL news dumbed it down for you, but they have to, because they don't understand this stuff any better. Do you think they have an advanced physicist working for AOL news
Nickbaldwin wrote:The sneaky neutral cunts! I should have guessed!
Snorri1234 wrote:suggs wrote:Cern is one of the great modern wonders of the world (in my opinion, and in anyone's who thinks that discovering more about our planet/the universe is useful/interesting).
Typical of the conspiricacy idiots to point the finger at one of the few good things going on in the world atm.
Word.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:suggs wrote:Cern is one of the great modern wonders of the world (in my opinion, and in anyone's who thinks that discovering more about our planet/the universe is useful/interesting).
Typical of the conspiricacy idiots to point the finger at one of the few good things going on in the world atm.
Word.
Okay, so I agree,
BUT, conspiracies are just so much more FUN to talk about!![]()
![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: jusplay4fun