medal for victories

by **JOHNNYROCKET24** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:17 pm

Concise description:

xxxxxxx

Specifics:

xxxxxxx

This will improve the following aspects of the site:

xxxxxxx (you can obviously delete this for bug reports)
xxxxxxx

there should be a medal for victories

by **t-o-m** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:20 pm

there is.
i havnt got my rating medal yet :cry:

by **AndyDufresne** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:20 pm

Unique opponents was a better approach than "victories"...as people could run up their "victories" through 1vs1. Unique opponents makes it more difficult to do so.

--Andy

by **JOHNNYROCKET24** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:34 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:Unique opponents was a better approach than "victories"...as people could run up their "victories" through 1vs1. Unique opponents makes it more difficult to do so.

--Andy

make the medal for 5,000 games than....

by **happy2seeyou** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:37 pm

We need a medal for Battle Royal winners.

by **AAFitz** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:38 pm

I believe, he is interested in any system that gives him more medals than me, and the handful of players that have more than him

by **AAFitz** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:39 pm

happy2seeyou wrote:We need a medal for Battle Royal winners.

a very good idea.. its a big spot for something few have or will do.. but a great idea nonetheless

by **happy2seeyou** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:40 pm

AAFitz wrote:
happy2seeyou wrote:We need a medal for Battle Royal winners.

a very good idea.. its a big spot for something few have or will do.. but a great idea nonetheless

Yeah plus I get one and you don't 8-)

by **ParadiceCity9** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:42 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Unique opponents was a better approach than "victories"...as people could run up their "victories" through 1vs1. Unique opponents makes it more difficult to do so.

--Andy
make the medal for 5,000 games than....

If he means games played then I agree.

by **ParadiceCity9** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:43 pm

AAFitz wrote:I believe, he is interested in any system that gives him more medals than me, and the handful of players that have more than him

Like me :p Go us!

by **JOHNNYROCKET24** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:47 pm

ParadiceCity9 wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Unique opponents was a better approach than "victories"...as people could run up their "victories" through 1vs1. Unique opponents makes it more difficult to do so.

--Andy
make the medal for 5,000 games than....

If he means games played then I agree.

no...victories

by **ParadiceCity9** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:05 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
ParadiceCity9 wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Unique opponents was a better approach than "victories"...as people could run up their "victories" through 1vs1. Unique opponents makes it more difficult to do so.

--Andy
make the medal for 5,000 games than....

If he means games played then I agree.
no...victories

oh gayyy...
well there should be a games played one too
and victories I guess. But gold for victories should be 2000, maybe 2500

by **Hotdoggie** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:16 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Unique opponents was a better approach than "victories"...as people could run up their "victories" through 1vs1. Unique opponents makes it more difficult to do so.

--Andy
make the medal for 5,000 games than....

Agreed...a medal for games played would be nice.

by **Incandenza** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:58 pm

Since we have these shiny new medals, it would be nice to have someplace on the profile page that lets us see our accumulated tallies (unique opponents defeated, etc.), if for no other reason than to determine how far one has to go to pick up another medal.

by **hulmey** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:02 pm

Incandenza wrote:Since we have these shiny new medals, it would be nice to have someplace on the profile page that lets us see our accumulated tallies (unique opponents defeated, etc.), if for no other reason than to determine how far one has to go to pick up another medal.

Game finder is your friend

by **Incandenza** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:11 pm

hulmey wrote:
Incandenza wrote:Since we have these shiny new medals, it would be nice to have someplace on the profile page that lets us see our accumulated tallies (unique opponents defeated, etc.), if for no other reason than to determine how far one has to go to pick up another medal.

Game finder is your friend

Spending an hour counting shit, however, isn't.

by **lancehoch** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:23 pm

Incandenza wrote:Since we have these shiny new medals, it would be nice to have someplace on the profile page that lets us see our accumulated tallies (unique opponents defeated, etc.), if for no other reason than to determine how far one has to go to pick up another medal.

Andy said in one of the other threads that this is on the To-Do list.

by **ParadiceCity9** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:26 pm

Hotdoggie wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Unique opponents was a better approach than "victories"...as people could run up their "victories" through 1vs1. Unique opponents makes it more difficult to do so.

--Andy
make the medal for 5,000 games than....

Agreed...a medal for games played would be nice.

No he meant victories

by **Gilligan** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:27 pm

What if you haven't gotten your medals yet?

by **Hotdoggie** on Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:59 pm

Gilligan wrote:What if you haven't gotten your medals yet?

you will do as soon as you win a game.

Website · by **Humrlmo** on Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:25 am

Ex-military here. There should be an Expeditionary medal for those that have played EACH map! That seems like such a task to complete, that a medal would be deserving. Also, maybe a Purple Heart if you got killed off in a Doubles, Triples, or Quads game and your team still won! Just some ideas!?!
8-)

by **amazzony** on Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:33 am

Humrlmo wrote:Ex-military here. There should be an Expeditionary medal for those that have played EACH map!

Did you mean who have won on each map? Because that would be worth a lot more IMO.
Though it might be a bit complicated because when new maps come out then what? Medals get taken away? :lol:

by **Gilligan** on Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:34 am

Hotdoggie wrote:
Gilligan wrote:What if you haven't gotten your medals yet?

you will do as soon as you win a game.

That worked. Thanks

Website · by **Humrlmo** on Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:45 am

amazzony wrote:
Humrlmo wrote:Ex-military here. There should be an Expeditionary medal for those that have played EACH map!

Did you mean who have won on each map? Because that would be worth a lot more IMO.
Though it might be a bit complicated because when new maps come out then what? Medals get taken away?

To win each would be more like a Medal of Honor! #-o

Just played each. As for taking away when new maps come out: the military doesn't ever take them away each time a new area is explored, why make it different? That could be the diffence between Bronze, Silver, Gold??? You'd have to wait for new maps to go up a level.

by **stahrgazer** on Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:35 pm

Oak leaf clusters are used in military to designate a repeat honor.

Thus, clusters would be fun, for those who have repeated some of the things.. which would be in line with the "how far do I have to go to the next medal?"

i.e. bronze is for 20 wins. a cluster at 40 unique opponent wins. another cluster at sixty, a final cluster at eighty.
At 100 there's silver. A silver cluster at 200.

medal for victories

medal for victories

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Re: medals

Who is online