soloman & risk master2000 [Blocked]

[Soloman]

i am trying to give you a way to end the speculation on your honour. It is very simple for you to do and would give fairly irrefutable evidence of your innocence.

if you can not find the evidence then that is a shame.

Again you clearly have not read it all here and are just trying to stir the pot contradictory evidence has already been shown over and ovver with the examples used and basic sense your idea is bad and it is sad that my pointing that out and vehemently attacking it resulted in your coming over here to attempt and attack my charactor. It is the pettiness of individuals such as yourself that hurts CC and kills the joy factor involved. While it is true we all are free to post whereever we choose your lack of involvement prior to our exchanges reveals your true intentions to subliminally flame. That and the fact you want to attempt to keep me busy so I do not point out the further falacies and overtly biased positions of your illogical proposal in suggestions.

The worst thing about it all is you apparently know how to play based upon your rank and know the truth and validity of the points made. I have explained myself to the utmost and supported with proof and logic and all you can do at this point is attempt to have me go through the logs of 400+ more games to give more examples of the same game play and I will again say go through and show that it does not occur the burden of proof is on you to show that these minority of games between my brother and I, the 6-10 accused of favortism out of our 33 played together is not the norm of play. The game log alone on the accussed games shows a lot based upon threat, opportunity, position and counter attacks how and why there were little attacks but again that is ignored all that is focused upon is the nuances or the fact we know each.

[jiminski]

just trying to help Soloman, I have some sympathy for you but it certainly looks a little suspicious when you look at certain games: truces in 3 man games with your brother; not attacking each other at all in various 4 man games, until the other players are eliminated.. etc etc.
If you are playing with your brother you should be very mindful of how your pattern of play can be perceived, you have been far from that.

However, if you can show a pattern of play with other players, consistent to what i have said above, you can in one stroke do away with the allegations, in my opinion.
Now either you are not willing to look due to stubbornness, or you have looked and can not find such corroborating evidence.

either way, i am afraid the cloud may remain over you both without such simple evidence.

[Soloman]

just trying to help Soloman, I have some sympathy for you but it certainly looks a little suspicious when you look at certain games: truces in 3 man games with your brother; not attacking each other at all in various 4 man games, until the other players are eliminated.. etc etc.
If you are playing with your brother you should be very mindful of how your pattern of play can be perceived, you have been far from that.

However, if you can show a pattern of play with other players, consistent to what i have said above, you can in one stroke do away with the allegations, in my opinion.
Now either you are not willing to look due to stubbornness, or you have looked and can not find such corroborating evidence.

either way, i am afraid the cloud may remain over you both without such simple evidence.

I do not need to look thorugh and it is not out of stuborness all of the proof is in the game logs of the games in which my brother and I played it shows the logic of the attacks in all 33 of the games played if you cannot read it from the log no matter what is posted you will dispute it. Your Intentions are transparent Jiminiske you are another petty individual who has a vendetta for whatever misguided anti social, illogical reasons. YOu can sugar coat your undertones as much as you desire I will not be baited into jumping through hoops for you.

Basic logic of gameplay exhonerates me and you know it so you have no legitimate proof of wrong doing and cannot show a consistant pattern past the fact I do not suicde against my brother just because he is my brother. The games listed in my defense and those I am accused in show a consistant pattern of play based upon basic fundametal strategy of the game as I have said the log of all the games already exhonerates me when looked at comparatively from an objective and non biased stand point. So please jimi unless you can dream up some more imaginary proof like your other imaginary postions in this game(like stalemates that cannot exist here based upon the rules of play) quit wasting my time...

[jiminski]

Honestly you can fix all this so very easily Soli; just do yourself a favour and put forward similar parallel evidence.
It is not for me to judge the legality of your actions, however you will be judged in the court of public opinion regardless of the official outcome here.
Sadly, due to the dubious nature of the play so far outlined, you will remain tarnished if you do not.
Ok i will shut-up now (unless you directly refer to my words) as this is not helpful to the official decision making, good luck.

[cisco2001]

He won't because he can't.

[Soloman]

He won't because he can't.

And rthen there is you Cisco please share your ever inciteful proof that the logic produced and shown in the game logs as to the nature of attacks is anything but that. Please just in these few games I am being accused of go through the log and show me how my attacking my brother would have benefited me if he were someone else that should be far simpler then going through my 400+ standard games to show that in none of them does the same strategy occur. The court of public oppinion here is composed of those that are shown to be biased from jump by there posts. You people are a minority group that see a conspiracy in everything or that have vendettas against me some of you are both. I challenge you to compare the games accused and the games I used in defense since it is a far smaller # and show that the same ideals of strategic attack based upon start postion, areas of closest bonus, Level of threat and of course retalitory counter attacks are not used in all. None of you will since you cannot...

[jiminski]

There is no 'vendetta' Soloman, this genuinely is in your mind.
Sure you advertised your name to me and it is why i looked at the thread. I quite often look in this forum and take particular interest in familiar names, that is human nature.

So my interest having been aroused, i looked at the evidence. The evidence, talking purely objectively, indicates a very powerful bias towards not attacking your brother and in many cases 'teaming-up' with him.

The evidence for this has been put forward and it is compelling! It may not be straightforward to act upon, as you were quite clever when you teamed up in the 3 player game for example; you announced the Truce in gamechat. Therefore rendering it 'legal'.. shady and mean-spirited but not illegal

So, your defence is that the seeming anomalies outlined are due to your specific strategy.
I therefore urged you to present evidence which showed you also have been involved in alternative games, where you did not attack another player until all others had been eliminated.
To do that would indicate that you are not biased towards particular players but that your 'style' sometimes does exclusively target particular players whilst completely ignoring others.

[Soloman]

Honestly you can fix all this so very easily Soli; just do yourself a favour and put forward similar parallel evidence.
It is not for me to judge the legality of your actions, however you will be judged in the court of public opinion regardless of the official outcome here.
Sadly, due to the dubious nature of the play so far outlined, you will remain tarnished if you do not.
Ok i will shut-up now (unless you directly refer to my words) as this is not helpful to the official decision making, good luck.

Since my honor continues to be attacked by you petty inidvidual I will list these few games as a sample group without my brother for compartative play

Game 156921 Note all of my large attacks were against blue till he was eliminated
Game 192730 Note I focused on green with majority and bulk of attacks till eliminated
Game 196654 Note How rarely I attacked green till everyone was eliminated
Game 2477356 Note all my large meaningfull attacks were against red till he was eliminated
Game 1102965 Note again majority of attacks all large attacks against red till eliminated
Game 2474320 Again Note all large attacks against blue till he was eliminated
Game 2204188 Note the bulk of early attacks against blue because of threat level
Game 1628821NOte I did not attack blue till everyone else was eliminated

the list is a lot longer here are just a few for sample purposes so please I invite you to review tese logs and all the rest of the games between my brother and self and see the consistancy in my strategy...

[Soloman]

There is no 'vendetta' Soloman, this genuinely is in your mind.
Sure you advertised your name to me and it is why i looked at the thread. I quite often look in this forum and take particular interest in familiar names, that is human nature.

So my interest having been aroused, i looked at the evidence. The evidence, talking purely objectively, indicates a very powerful bias towards not attacking your brother and in many cases 'teaming-up' with him.

The evidence for this has been put forward and it is compelling! It may not be straightforward to act upon, as you were quite clever when you teamed up in the 3 player game for example; you announced the Truce in gamechat. Therefore rendering it 'legal'.. shady and mean-spirited but not illegal

So, your defence is that the seeming anomalies outlined are due to your specific strategy.
I therefore urged you to present evidence which showed you also have been involved in alternative games, where you did not attack another player until all others had been eliminated.
To do that would indicate that you are not biased towards particular players but that your 'style' sometimes does exclusively target particular players whilst completely ignoring others.

Your vendetta is clear you have no objectivity in your accussations and show ignorance by ignoring the facts and doing no research you know the truth of gameplay and it's direction is determined by the factors I have repeatedly mentioned I even have more current games that are active where the same strategy is still being employed and the strategy is not mine alone it is a bases strategy ythe biased in your continued posts is true indicator of your integrity and charactor. The proof as I have said is evident in all the games I have played and the consistancy in strategy is there.

The fact none of you can even take the games accused which I play with my brother and show where I showed him favortism to my detriment is further proof you have no logic in your accusations, they all break down to the fact that you people wish I would suicide or make lopsided detrimental attacks against someone I know just because I know and to prove there is no collusion between us. I pitty you as it seems your logic is not based on reality anywhere in this game but rather imaginary and impossible scerios that hold no ground CC reality...

[jiminski]

Game 156921 Note all of my large attacks were against blue till he was eliminated
Game 192730 Note I focused on green with majority and bulk of attacks till eliminated
Game 196654 Note How rarely I attacked green till everyone was eliminated
Game 2477356 Note all my large meaningfull attacks were against red till he was eliminated
Game 1102965 Note again majority of attacks all large attacks against red till eliminated
Game 2474320 Again Note all large attacks against blue till he was eliminated
Game 2204188 Note the bulk of early attacks against blue because of threat level
Game 1628821NOte I did not attack blue till everyone else was eliminated

the list is a lot longer here are just a few for sample purposes so please I invite you to review tese logs and all the rest of the games between my brother and self and see the consistancy in my strategy...

Game 156921 -

Note all of my large attacks were against blue till he was eliminated

Green = rgrizzle

Attacks prior to 3rd player elimination:
2007-01-02 04:48:26 - Soloman attacked Eastern Australia from New Guinea and conquered it from rgrizzle
2007-01-02 05:12:36 - Soloman attacked Central America from Western United States and conquered it from rgrizzle
2007-01-02 21:50:56 - Soloman attacked Northwest Territory from Alberta and conquered it from rgrizzle
2007-01-03 22:06:40 - Soloman attacked Central America from Western United States and conquered it from rgrizzle
2007-01-03 22:06:56 - Soloman attacked Venezuela from Central America and conquered it from rgrizzle


Game 192730 -

Note I focused on green with majority and bulk of attacks till eliminated

Blue = uhlman2

Attacks prior to 3rd player elimination:
2007-01-25 17:29:29 - Soloman attacked Alexandria from Eastern Desert and conquered it from uhlman2
2007-01-25 17:32:53 - Soloman attacked Euphrates from Jordan and conquered it from uhlman2
2007-01-25 17:47:57 - Soloman attacked Israel and PT from Sinai and conquered it from uhlman2
2007-01-26 15:31:40 - Soloman attacked Pakistan from Oman and conquered it from uhlman2
2007-01-26 15:31:50 - Soloman attacked Baluchistan from Pakistan and conquered it from uhlman2


Game 196654 -

Note How rarely I attacked green till everyone was eliminated

Green = FightingMuffin

4 player game Attacks prior to 4th and 3rd player elimination:
2007-01-27 23:26:21 - Soloman attacked Belarus from Moscow and conquered it from FightingMuffin
2007-01-28 21:03:10 - Soloman attacked Ukraine from Belarus and conquered it from FightingMuffin
2007-01-28 21:03:52 - Soloman attacked Moldova from Ukraine and conquered it from FightingMuffin
2007-01-29 05:52:42 - Soloman attacked Austria from West Germany and conquered it from FightingMuffin

Game 2477356 -

Note all my large meaningfull attacks were against red till he was eliminated

blue = tygerty

Attacks prior to 3rd player elimination:
2008-05-20 15:18:31 - Soloman attacked De Peel from NoordLimburg and conquered it from tygerty
2008-05-20 16:04:33 - Soloman attacked Heusden from Maaskant and conquered it from tygerty
2008-05-20 21:17:02 - Soloman attacked Flevoland from Overijssel and conquered it from tygerty
2008-05-20 21:17:09 - Soloman attacked Amsterdam from Flevoland and conquered it from tygerty
2008-05-20 21:17:17 - Soloman attacked Beemster from Amsterdam and conquered it from tygerty


Game 1102965 -

Note again majority of attacks all large attacks against red till eliminated

Green = pazzzini

Attacks prior to 3rd player elimination:
2007-10-30 23:07:13 - Soloman attacked Kamchatka from Alaska and conquered it from pazzzini
2007-10-31 03:01:24 - Soloman attacked Siam from China and conquered it from pazzzini
2007-10-31 23:18:27 - Soloman attacked Iceland from Greenland and conquered it from pazzzini
2007-10-31 23:18:34 - Soloman attacked Great Britain from Iceland and conquered it from pazzzini
2007-11-01 23:25:25 - Soloman attacked Ural from Afghanistan and conquered it from pazzzini
2007-11-01 23:25:30 - Soloman attacked Siberia from Ural and conquered it from pazzzini

Game 2204188 -

Note the bulk of early attacks against blue because of threat level

Red = hairingtons

Attacks prior to 3rd player elimination:
2008-04-09 22:27:21 - Soloman attacked SoCal from Baja California and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-10 19:00:21 - Soloman attacked MOOS-1111 from STTL-0000 and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-11 19:01:25 - Soloman attacked TATR-0101 from STTL-0000 and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-11 19:01:40 - Soloman attacked WYMG-0110 from TATR-0101 and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-11 22:18:07 - Soloman attacked Arizona from Not Mexico and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-11 22:18:15 - Soloman attacked Colorado from Not Mexico and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-12 18:44:55 - Soloman attacked Missouri from Arkansas and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-12 18:45:02 - Soloman attacked Corn from Missouri and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-12 18:45:07 - Soloman attacked Dakota from Corn and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-12 18:45:13 - Soloman attacked Nebraska from Dakota and conquered it from hairingtons
2008-04-12 18:45:17 - Soloman attacked Oz from Nebraska and conquered it from hairingtons


ok I looked at most, the point is, in these examples (absolute the most favourable ones with regards your case i am sure) although you do attack other opposition players more aggressively but they are not even close to being comparable to the favouritism you show your brother. In many of the games which you play him you are attacking him 1 time and only when it is a single for a card!

Only in the Age of Realms did you replicate the same degree of specific targeting and that is largely due to the maps Gameplay and the prevalence of the Neutral forces.

So whether or not your bias is a partially subconscious or not, you show a real favouritism to your brother which you have not replicated above to anywhere near the same degree and consistency.

due to the nature of the games which includes a level of paranoia and uncertainty towards neighbouring opposition, i forward the position that to only attack a player, in a 3 man game, on a standard gameplay map is highly improbable. To do it consistently is impossible, unless there is something else afoot.

[jiminski]

Your vendetta is clear you have no objectivity in your accussations and show ignorance by ignoring the facts and doing no research you know the truth of gameplay and it's direction is determined by the factors I have repeatedly mentioned I even have more current games that are active where the same strategy is still being employed and the strategy is not mine alone it is a bases strategy ythe biased in your continued posts is true indicator of your integrity and charactor. The proof as I have said is evident in all the games I have played and the consistancy in strategy is there.

The fact none of you can even take the games accused which I play with my brother and show where I showed him favortism to my detriment is further proof you have no logic in your accusations, they all break down to the fact that you people wish I would suicide or make lopsided detrimental attacks against someone I know just because I know and to prove there is no collusion between us. I pitty you as it seems your logic is not based on reality anywhere in this game but rather imaginary and impossible scerios that hold no ground CC reality...

let's try to keep it civil Soloman; it is best for you, if we can, to prove your innocence with the utmost of scrutiny.

[Frop]

let's try to keep it civil Soloman; it is best for you, if we can, to prove your innocence with the utmost of scrutiny.

I'm surprised you even managed to get through the dribble - the first paragraph is nearly a single sentence and literally void of punctuation.

[Soloman]

Your vendetta is clear you have no objectivity in your accussations and show ignorance by ignoring the facts and doing no research you know the truth of gameplay and it's direction is determined by the factors I have repeatedly mentioned I even have more current games that are active where the same strategy is still being employed and the strategy is not mine alone it is a bases strategy ythe biased in your continued posts is true indicator of your integrity and charactor. The proof as I have said is evident in all the games I have played and the consistancy in strategy is there.

The fact none of you can even take the games accused which I play with my brother and show where I showed him favortism to my detriment is further proof you have no logic in your accusations, they all break down to the fact that you people wish I would suicide or make lopsided detrimental attacks against someone I know just because I know and to prove there is no collusion between us. I pitty you as it seems your logic is not based on reality anywhere in this game but rather imaginary and impossible scerios that hold no ground CC reality...

let's try to keep it civil Soloman; it is best for you, if we can, to prove your innocence with the utmost of scrutiny.

Your words in both posts betray your biased Jimi, that and the ignorance of the accusations you clearly have not studied I grabbed a few random games out of 400+ that I won and I did it inbetween posts ealier as you can tell by the time stamps the game play is consistant and as I said no matter what proof is shown your mind is set because of your issues with me. I guess you truly are just pompous as your signature states. study the games all of them, learn your facts then come back and discuss...Actually if you did that you would have nothing to say so I guess I will just await the next spewing of veiled nonsense from you...

[cisco2001]

I looked at your 3 player games. If you think about it logically, there is a 50/50 chance of attacking either of your opponents. When you look at three player games that DO NOT involve your brother, your attacks are pretty even on the other two players; even taking into account your strategy. i.e. getting the US or SA as a bonus territory. However, that pattern does not hold true when your brother is in play. In those instances, the ratio drops greatly to favor your brother.

In the past you have come down on JR because he plays lower ranked players. According to you, "This is unhonaurable." FYI: I know that "unhonaurable" is not a real word but Soloman's spelling and punctuation is unique. So, if there is no honor in playing lower ranked players then is it dishonorable to team up with your brother in a three player game?

Regardless, honorable or not. It's the MO that you and your brother follow in your three player games. I'm afraid that it's that simple.

[Soloman]

I looked at your 3 player games. If you think about it logically, there is a 50/50 chance of attacking either of your opponents. When you look at three player games that DO NOT involve your brother, your attacks are pretty even on the other two players; even taking into account your strategy. i.e. getting the US or SA as a bonus territory. However, that pattern does not hold true when your brother is in play. In those instances, the ratio drops greatly to favor your brother.

In the past you have come down on JR because he plays lower ranked players. According to you, "This is unhonaurable." FYI: I know that "unhonaurable" is not a real word but Soloman's spelling and punctuation is unique. So, if there is no honor in playing lower ranked players then is it dishonorable to team up with your brother in a three player game?

Regardless, honorable or not. It's the MO that you and your brother follow in your three player games. I'm afraid that it's that simple.

Aww so you reviewed all 144, 3 player games I played only 9 of those were with my brother remember, as I look through they look pretty consistant but as I said when someone minds made up the nuances do not matter to them the fact are irregardless. I apologize that I do not spell check on here as I type in real time if there is a typo oh well that is life I am not being graded on spelling, proper grammar or punctuation so really in the end who cares if you understand what is being conveyed. Again your position is crystal same as Johnnys, Jimi is mad for different reasons but in the end you all are sad pathetic individuals with whom the facts do not matter so no whatever is proven will just be discounted and disregarded by you people as your mind is made up...

[cisco2001]

That's the point. You and your brother gang up on the other player in a three player game. Thanks for confirming it.

[Soloman]

That's the point. You and your brother gang up on the other player in a three player game. Thanks for confirming it.

Thank you for further proving that you have not reviewed the games and that your posts are not based on facts with your ignorant statements. I am greatful that you have not taken the time to actually review the logs objectively with basic fundametal CC Strategy, Because had you done so this argument would be over and I would not get to read your patronizing falacies. Maybe tomorrow I will post more and continue to play with you children in mentalities if not age. Maybe by some type of miracle someone will actually take the time to read the logs and mentally move with them and see the points of logic used in the moves, but sadly based on the posts to date that is unlikely to happen...

[cisco2001]

Soloman,

We have reviewed the game logs. This thread is extremely long because there have been pages of examples given. I have just been summarizing what the testimonies, with long and detailed examples, have shown. That very simply, you favor your brother and vice versa.

As to spelling and punctuation, I don't have a problem with it nor do plenty of other players in this forum. We all type quickly but taking the time to use correct English makes it easier for other readers to follow what is written. You, as an older brother, should set an example. I can see why your brother is ridiculed for grammar and spelling. However, if you don't know how to do it, I understand. It's no effort for me and should pose no problem for you, if you know how?

Again, there have been dozens of examples given and your peers have shown, countless times, that you and your brother form alliances against other players. I'm sorry, but you're not going to blabber and mindlessly type your way out of the truth. Facts are facts and you can't deny the game logs. I'm afraid that you are out of excuses.

[jiminski]

You may be correct Soloman; it is easy to be inspired to concentration in the face of your particular brand of debate.

But most of us have tried to maintain a respect for the facts.
The pure, simple fact is that we have checked the games; both your examples of the pattern of your strategy and those put forward by Rocket. Looking at them with anything close to half a brain and with anything close to objectivity, it is plain to see that you favour your brother over any other player you have ever played against!
You don't just favour him, you team-up with him and kill unsuspecting opponents. (think of them Soloman .. not very nice is it!?)

Perhaps you have focussed our attention on your case disproportionately, via the expressions of your character, but that is only a motivation.
Although being called "pathetic" and "pompous" does excite a certain determination, it does not change the reality of the case.

the reality is that you have created situations of unspoken fraternal allegiance which have gone towards the isolation of your foes.
If you had not so clearly done so, i would have been out of this thread days ago, letting it fall into the archives of misappropriated doubt.

but look at this, this one single case and without much more analysis, indicates strongly that you avoid conflict with your brother (well that is to be commended but not by the poor bugger, who as a result, gets tag-teamed to defeat):

Game 215644

4 player game where they team up against the other 2 players. Take note that they did not attack each other until the other 2 players were eliminated. Then they battled it out for the points.

I believe there was 1 solitary mutual attack between the 2 brothers, green and red, prior to round 9:

2007-02-07 01:00:32 - risk master2000 attacked GoldenPalace.com from Arizona and conquered it from Soloman

Once the other 2 players were killed off:
2007-02-07 01:20:04 - Soloman eliminated your granny from the game in round - 8
2007-02-07 01:22:56 - risk master2000 eliminated Ska from the game in round - 8

2007-02-07 01:26:07 - Incrementing game to round 9

2007-02-07 01:24:32 - risk master2000 attacked Colorado from Not Mexico and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:24:49 - risk master2000 attacked Brigham from Colorado and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:25:08 - risk master2000 attacked GoldenPalace.com from Brigham and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:25:23 - risk master2000 attacked Arkansas from Missouri and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:27:26 - Soloman attacked Missouri from Illinois and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:27:34 - Soloman attacked Arkansas from Missouri and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:27:50 - Soloman attacked Corn from Missouri and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:28:13 - risk master2000 attacked ORGN-0100 from GoldenPalace.com and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:28:18 - Soloman attacked Nebraska from Corn and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:28:31 - Soloman attacked Oz from Nebraska and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:29:10 - Soloman attacked Colorado from Oz and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:29:21 - Soloman attacked Brigham from Colorado and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:29:29 - Soloman attacked Arizona from Brigham and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:29:37 - Soloman attacked Not Mexico from Arizona and conquered it from risk master2000

2007-02-07 01:31:56 - Incrementing game to round 10

2007-02-07 01:32:32 - risk master2000 attacked Brigham from GoldenPalace.com and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:32:44 - risk master2000 attacked Colorado from Brigham and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:32:57 - Soloman attacked Brigham from Arizona and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:32:58 - risk master2000 attacked Oz from Colorado and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:33:11 - risk master2000 attacked Missouri from Oz and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:33:12 - Soloman attacked Colorado from Brigham and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:33:23 - risk master2000 attacked Arkansas from Missouri and conquered it from Soloman
2007-02-07 01:33:34 - Soloman attacked Oz from Colorado and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:33:43 - Soloman attacked Missouri from Oz and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:33:50 - Soloman attacked Arkansas from Missouri and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:34:32 - Soloman attacked GoldenPalace.com from Brigham and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:34:42 - Soloman attacked ORGN-0100 from GoldenPalace.com and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:34:49 - Soloman attacked NoCal from ORGN-0100 and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:35:09 - Soloman attacked SoCal from NoCal and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:35:16 - Soloman attacked Baja California from SoCal and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:35:23 - Soloman attacked Hawaii from Baja California and conquered it from risk master2000
2007-02-07 01:35:23 - Soloman eliminated risk master2000 from the game

Now perhaps you are both to be commended; for you and your brother to avoid each other so completely is a logistical feat of some gravity*.. but that is not the point of the game.




*a feat which you do not even get close to replicating on analysis of your 'non brother' examples.

[Yvgni]

Soloman was rumored to pen:

I am not being graded on spelling, proper grammar or punctuation so really in the end who cares if you understand what is being conveyed

Actually, whether you realize it or not, you are constantly being graded on your spelling, grammer, and punctuation. In real life you are also graded on your speech patterns, the way you dress, and the way you carry yourself. People make judgments on these things, often subconsciously, but often consciously as well.

In a text environment, someone who pays attention to the details of communicating in that environment will typically have an advantage of someone who does not, even with such basics as readability and comprehension. I start to "fuzz out" when I read any of your longer sentences or paragraphs, for example.

So I care, your mother cares, your English grammar teacher cares. Have a heart, punctuate.

Respectfully,

Yvgni.

[JOHNNYROCKET24]

Soloman was rumored to pen:

I am not being graded on spelling, proper grammar or punctuation so really in the end who cares if you understand what is being conveyed

Actually, whether you realize it or not, you are constantly being graded on your spelling, grammer, and punctuation. In real life you are also graded on your speech patterns, the way you dress, and the way you carry yourself. People make judgments on these things, often subconsciously, but often consciously as well.

In a text environment, someone who pays attention to the details of communicating in that environment will typically have an advantage of someone who does not, even with such basics as readability and comprehension. I start to "fuzz out" when I read any of your longer sentences or paragraphs, for example.

So I care, your mother cares, your English grammar teacher cares. Have a heart, punctuate.

Respectfully,

Yvgni.

so does your Grammar teacher

[jiminski]

let's stay on topic

[Soloman]

let's stay on topic

[url][/url]you are pathetic so everytime I post in suggestions against your bad fictional idea you will come and support this fictional accusation at least you are consistant in charactor but since it has been brought up I would like to point something out JR has produced no new evidence only rehashed the ones I was already cleared on that were mentioned way earlier in the thread there is no new evidence because there was no evidence in the 1st place. Nothing new has been posted just the same crap restated over and over and over by both sides. I guess it just proves a fact no matter what the facts do not change and with no new evidence neither will the clearing. So Jimi your idea still sux in Suggestions and even another elite has said it does not exist what will your next excuse be as to why you post here just to further retaliate for being exposed...

[JOHNNYROCKET24]

let's stay on topic

[url][/url]you are pathetic so everytime I post in suggestions against your bad fictional idea you will come and support this fictional accusation at least you are consistant in charactor but since it has been brought up I would like to point something out JR has produced no new evidence only rehashed the ones I was already cleared on that were mentioned way earlier in the thread there is no new evidence because there was no evidence in the 1st place. Nothing new has been posted just the same crap restated over and over and over by both sides. I guess it just proves a fact no matter what the facts do not change and with no new evidence neither will the clearing. So Jimi your idea still sux in Suggestions and even another elite has said it does not exist what will your next excuse be as to why you post here just to further retaliate for being exposed...

I clearly provided in detail 9 examples of you and your brother teaming in singles play. If more examples are needed than I will provide more but I feel enough evidence has been showen.

[Soloman]

let's stay on topic

[url][/url]you are pathetic so everytime I post in suggestions against your bad fictional idea you will come and support this fictional accusation at least you are consistant in charactor but since it has been brought up I would like to point something out JR has produced no new evidence only rehashed the ones I was already cleared on that were mentioned way earlier in the thread there is no new evidence because there was no evidence in the 1st place. Nothing new has been posted just the same crap restated over and over and over by both sides. I guess it just proves a fact no matter what the facts do not change and with no new evidence neither will the clearing. So Jimi your idea still sux in Suggestions and even another elite has said it does not exist what will your next excuse be as to why you post here just to further retaliate for being exposed...

I clearly provided in detail 9 examples of you and your brother teaming in singles play. If more examples are needed than I will provide more but I feel enough evidence has been showen.

YOu have provided nine games already discussed ealier in the thread nothing new...