I wanna jet ski around the UK! that would be awesome! NOT survival....
Iz Man wrote:I wouldn't call Bear a fraud.
I haven't heard anything about hotel stays, lunches, and that other B.S.
The guy was British Special Forces, and he did climb Everest......at 23! The youngest Brit ever to do that. He also jet-skied around the U.K. apparently.
Given that I find it hard to believe the guy is a fraud.
What he's doing when he does some of the off-the-wall stuff is showing the viewer what is possible in extreme cases of survival.
Is it pumped up a bit? Sure, its a T.V. show.......but I guarantee if for some reason (who knows why) you're stuck in the Sahara and are dieing of thirst, you'll be squeezing some elephant shit and thanking Bear for giving you the idea....
But Les is cool, no doubt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_vs._Wild#CriticismCriticism
After a series of exposés by the Daily Mail,[2][3][4] the show was put on hiatus while Discovery reviewed claims that it deceived viewers.[5] The show resumed on September 24, 2007, with a disclaimer at the beginning of each episode, scenes removed, and altered voiceover indicating where situations were staged. The decision to rebroadcast the show on Channel 4 is yet undecided.[6]
[edit] Realism
Grylls has stated numerous times on camera that he is not to receive any assistance unless his life is in danger. However, in July 2007 it was reported in the mainstream media that Grylls allegedly received aid during some sequences of certain episodes. In response to criticism, British Channel 4 issued a statement saying that:
"The programme explicitly does not claim that presenter Bear Grylls' experience is one of unaided solo survival. For example, he often directly addresses the production team, including the cameraman, making it clear he is receiving an element of back-up." [7]
An article on the BBC News website also reported on the sentiments of Channel 4 towards the allegations:
"The broadcaster [Channel 4] said Grylls carried out his own stunts and did place himself in perilous situations, "though he does so within clearly-observed health and safety guidelines required on productions of this kind"". [8]
The Discovery Channel said that future airings would be edited (including a disclaimer at the beginning of each episode) so as not to imply to viewers that Grylls was left alone to survive during production of the show. Since then, Grylls has stated on camera when he has received assistance in order to demonstrate survival tactics (such as attaining a dead camel from Saharan indigenous peoples to show viewers how to extract water from the carcass and make a shelter for sand storms) or is exiting the setting for a period of time due to safety concerns (as in the episode in the Scottish Highlands). Grylls also tells the cameras filming behind the scenes footage how the film crew sometimes assists him in order to film certain sequences (such as rummaging for earthworms for food along with Grylls in the Patagonia episode or when a crew member caught a salmon which Bear then ate during the Alaskan mountains episode).[9][10][11][12]
On August 3, 2007, Grylls posted on his blog that the "press accusations of motels and stagings in the show that have been doing the rounds, all I can say is they don't always tell the full story, but that's life and part of being in the public eye I guess." [13]
In reponse to allegations of spending nights in local hotels as opposed to staying in the shelters built during filming, Grylls clarifies in an article in the December 3 issue of People Magazine that:
“Episodes take about ten days to tape, explains Grylls: “The night stuff [shown on camera] is all done for real. But when I’m not filming I stay with the crew in some sort of base camp." Episodes now clarify when Grylls gets support from his crew and when situations are staged, “We should have done that from the start,” he says. “The more you see, the more real it feels.”” [14]
In spite of allegations, The Discovery Channel has released behind the scenes footage showing how sequences of "Man VS Wild" are filmed. In the footage, while setting up a scene, each production crew member is introduced and their role is briefly explained, including a safety consultant who served in the Royal Marines. During the scenes, Bear Grylls tells how each crew members' role ensures his safety while he explains survival tactics. The footage includes open discussion over a safety harness and other precautions and also contains the production crew doing various takes with Grylls during dangerous stunts (including three sky diving jumps from a helicopter in the Patagonia episode). The crew of Man VS Wild go to great lengths during filming to comply with safety regulations without any pretense of covering up their actions. No member of the production crew, including Grylls, attempts to alter or omit details of how episodes are filmed in the behind the scenes footage. Portions of the footage can be viewed on YouTube. [15]
[edit] Survival advice
On March 13, 2006, the show's first survival consultant, Ron Hood, posted on his website:
"I want to remind everyone that Bear is very capable and highly skilled in survival skills. We both objected to portions of the show when we filmed but thought we knew that my narration would enlighten the viewers about the hows, whys and wherefores of what look like dangerous activities. When that narration was removed it left Bear looking like he was clueless. He is not clueless. He is clever, courageous and capable. If anyone can save this show it is Bear. As I posted when we started this project months ago, the show was supposed to be a new format that was drama driven with an educational and adventure component. The script I have looks nothing like the final show."
"I think Discovery did the viewing public a serious disservice by excluding the educational narration and concentrating on travel. Someone WILL attempt river travel as shown and there will be problems. Others will run from camp because they hear noises... Someone will attempt a rappel with paracord. People are like that. Discovery holds a huge credibility advantage and that alone will act as an endorsement of the actions seen in the show. Keep in mind that a LOT of people saw the show and a few of them are ignorant enough to attempt what they saw. Disclaimers aside, the presentation looks feasible. The fact that some folks overlooked the errors just proves the point."[16]