Moderator: Community Team
tzor wrote:Obviously (if you believe in a literal interpertation of the Bible) Noah put the unicorns in the ark because they continued to exist long after the flood. Mind you medieval explorers really weren't all that accurate in their descriptions and it is currently believed that they were describing rhinos in Africa. This evolved to the heraldic unicorn which of course never existed.
Bertros Bertros wrote:Whoah whoah whoah. The bible mentions Unicorns after the flood?
tzor wrote:No people do. And these reports all postdate even the writing of Genesis by a significant amount.
Bertros Bertros wrote:So following that to its logical conculsion we can assume that all living creatures reported to exist after the writing of Genesis we're by definition in the Ark regardless of whether they are in the illustrations of the Ark or not
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?
nmhunate wrote:Well, you all are wrong. In fact there are no unicorns, but at the time of the flood they were alicorns, flying unicorns. Since Noah didn't have to carry flying creatures on the arc, unicorns lived. However, shortly after the flood, the majority of the alicorns lost their wings and became unicorns and were hunted to extinction for their valuable horn.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
MR. Nate wrote:with the understanding that it's quite possible I'm feeding a troll, I will point out that there is no biblical evidence for unicorns. If they existed at the time of the flood they were on the ark, but I have yet to see any evidence for the existance of unicorns.
MR. Nate wrote:with the understanding that it's quite possible I'm feeding a troll, I will point out that there is no biblical evidence for unicorns. If they existed at the time of the flood they were on the ark, but I have yet to see any evidence for the existance of unicorns.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Gregrios wrote:MR. Nate wrote:with the understanding that it's quite possible I'm feeding a troll, I will point out that there is no biblical evidence for unicorns. If they existed at the time of the flood they were on the ark, but I have yet to see any evidence for the existance of unicorns.
Nate, you are feeding a trool because it's impossible to be that stupid.
All he's doing is patrinizing God and the Bible. Don't buy into it.
2dimes wrote:Go jump in a pool in maui DaGip, I fast posted the unicorn and mine's a video clip.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Users browsing this forum: ConfederateSS