InkL0sed wrote:Well, I'm going to unvote vote no lynch for now. I get the feeling that plenty is going to happen at night to give us information.
ANd from where did ou get this 'feelng"??
Moderator: Community Team
kalishnikov wrote:Unvote, vote: inkl0sed
Ink, scum no lyncher... The only people a day 1 no lynch benefits are the scum, scum, as we get no info. With this many players, even if we hit town on a lynch today, it's still worth it for the role reveal. And I'd refrain form saying things like 'I've got a feeling there be many kills made tonight,' seems like you KNOW, scum.
-Exile
InkL0sed wrote:wicked wrote:InkL0sed wrote:Well, I'm going to unvote vote no lynch for now. I get the feeling that plenty is going to happen at night to give us information.
And from where did ou get this 'feelng"??
I'd rather not say.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
InkL0sed wrote:Well, I'll put it this way: it seems to me that people generally lynch the wrong person Day 1 anyway. What's the point in having in all likelihood two dead townies at the end of the night?
Secondly, this game seems to have some seriously crazy (pun intended) roles. I'm fairly certain some of them include some... interesting... ways to obtain information about people. That's the part of my feeling I have no problem saying. The other part would be unwise for me to say at the moment.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
icedagger wrote:
Fircoal is scum!
Neoteny is scum!
/ is scum!
Minister Masket is scum!
I guess we should lynch one of them then?[/i]
Talapus wrote:I really have no clue as to why you would claim with only 2 votes on you in a game with over 30 players. That makes no sense what so ever. But, it is a believable claim so I'll unvote for now.
Talapus wrote:I really have no clue as to why you would claim with only 2 votes on you in a game with over 30 players. That makes no sense what so ever. But, it is a believable claim so I'll unvote for now.
diddle wrote:Talapus wrote:I really have no clue as to why you would claim with only 2 votes on you in a game with over 30 players. That makes no sense what so ever. But, it is a believable claim so I'll unvote for now.
QFT, on all the above points. I think there may be more to this, but for now, I'll let it be.
icedagger wrote:diddle wrote:Talapus wrote:I really have no clue as to why you would claim with only 2 votes on you in a game with over 30 players. That makes no sense what so ever. But, it is a believable claim so I'll unvote for now.
QFT, on all the above points. I think there may be more to this, but for now, I'll let it be.
Hey diddle diddle
Users browsing this forum: No registered users