Moderator: Community Team
got tonkaed wrote:would you argue that luke skywalker lived without passion or emotion?
surely he lived with both and he did not falter.
Book was decent enough, though the movie (even if you never read the book) sucked.Iliad wrote:Eragon. Not that the book was great anyway
ignotus wrote:Casino Royale
ignotus wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:ignotus wrote:Casino Royale
Which one?
1967
ignotus wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:ignotus wrote:Casino Royale
Which one?
1967
reminisco wrote:ignotus wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:ignotus wrote:Casino Royale
Which one?
1967
yeah, i was gonna say....
the new one was phenomenal. everything Martin Campbell directs is great.
but you're right. the old one.. blech.
i wanna see more Bond movies -- if they're gonna actually start adapting the novels instead of making up bullshit, i'll be there opening night every single time.
i've read everything Ian Fleming ever wrote!
soka wrote:300
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
suggs wrote:soka wrote:300
The Thermopolae travesty? Yes, i thougth it was going to be excellent but it turned out to be a pile of poo.
Napoleon Ier wrote:suggs wrote:soka wrote:300
The Thermopolae travesty? Yes, i thougth it was going to be excellent but it turned out to be a pile of poo.
Really? On a purely superficial level, it was a cinematic sensory feast.
suggs wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:suggs wrote:soka wrote:300
The Thermopolae travesty? Yes, i thougth it was going to be excellent but it turned out to be a pile of poo.
Really? On a purely superficial level, it was a cinematic sensory feast.
you're in Good rorm, Nap
a "sensory feast". Yeah, it looked cool, but it there was no script. Would have been a cool silent film.
OK, there were some cool quotes, but they were from Herodutus anyway-shame he didnt write the rest of it
Users browsing this forum: Evil Semp