U guys sicken me

by **greenoaks** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:31 pm

RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

by **ignotus** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:35 pm

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

Well I am from (primitive) Balkans so I'm excused. :roll:

I really don't see anything wrong in a little bit of lust. What is wrong with that? btw I respect women for their intellect as well (like btown, wicked, apey, h2sy, et cetera). Without them this forum would look like a gay party. :wink:

P.S. Norse got a better sense of humor so I don't think it's him. :roll:

by **InkL0sed** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:37 pm

greenoaks wrote:
RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.

by **ignotus** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:37 pm

InkL0sed wrote:The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.

QFT!

by **firth4eva** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:40 pm

Let's have a vote.
Who thinks its Norse?
Who thinks it's Snorri?
Who thinks it's some real misguided woman?
Vote now.

by **greenoaks** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:42 pm

InkL0sed wrote:
greenoaks wrote:
RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.

yet the whole world seems to agree that George Bush is a dumbass.

by **InkL0sed** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:43 pm

greenoaks wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:
greenoaks wrote:
RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.
yet the whole world seems to agree that George Bush is a dumbass.

So...?

by **Napoleon Ier** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:45 pm

ignotus wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.

QFT!

Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

by **Snorri1234** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:51 pm

ignotus wrote:P.S. Norse got a better sense of humor so I don't think it's him.

Location: Handcuffed to a daffodil
Website:
Occupation: ....what's occupation mean?
Interests: Pixies, rainbows and cherry drops.

Yeah, don't think it's him either. :-^

by **Neutrino** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:01 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

Intriguing. I too care deeply about the minutiae of French history.

by **bloknayrb** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:20 pm

Neutrino wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

Intriguing. I too care deeply about the minutiae of French history.

My god... can I use this as my forum sig from now on?

by **Gregrios** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:22 pm

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

As much as people don't like to hear it, your absolutely right. Women are more than just a body. On the other hand though, if a woman dresses to tease than she is subjecting herself to looks of lust. I don't feel a bit bad about women who are half dressed and complain about comments they get.

It's the oldest story in the book. If you don't want people thinking that all you are is a nice body than don't go around dressed half naked and expect respect.

Unfortunitely, guys don't limit their sexual comments to those that are looking for that kind of attention.

I hate to say it but women are more responsable for the lack of respect than men are. No to say that their fully responsable but they definitely carry most of the blame.

by **Neutrino** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:27 pm

bloknayrb wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

Intriguing. I too care deeply about the minutiae of French history.

My god... can I use this as my forum sig from now on?

Sure.

by **Napoleon Ier** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:01 pm

Neutrino wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

Intriguing. I too care deeply about the minutiae of French history.

As you should, child.

by **0ojakeo0** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:17 pm

RadicalJerk wrote: eggsamples .

AAHAHAHA. with that spelling im suprised noone thought it was me.

by **Skoffin** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:45 pm

I can't tell you how surprised I am that no one has posted any half-naked pics by now... are you guys losing your touch?

by **Kid_A** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:26 pm

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

show us your vagina

by **griffin_slayer** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:40 pm

i think big & rich have it right http://youtube.com/watch?v=RWplisHNE6w&feature=related

by **UCAbears** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:02 pm

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

Your kinda a hypocrite aren't you?

by **griffin_slayer** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:04 pm

he's right

by **greenoaks** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:22 pm

InkL0sed wrote:
greenoaks wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:
greenoaks wrote:
RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.
yet the whole world seems to agree that George Bush is a dumbass.

So...?

Bush has a low iq.

by **griffin_slayer** on Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:36 pm

not really, everyone just hates him and says he has a low iq as a result of that hate. understand?

by **MeDeFe** on Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:16 am

Skoffin wrote:I can't tell you how surprised I am that no one has posted any half-naked pics by now... are you guys losing your touch?

I will remedy the situation immediately.

And one fully naked as well, those shoes really cannot count as clothing.

by **radiojake** on Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:33 am

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

Is this brooksieb making a poor attempt to parody me?