hairingtons wrote:wicked wrote:I didn't say you couldn't say it was a negative experience. I said take out the first line that said it was a negative feedback. That's all. You lost the privilege to leave him a negative once your first one was so obviously retaliatory, so you can't classify it as one. It'll be obvious to all who read that you consider it a negative.
The fact that you specifically responded to and referred to his feedback in yours for him makes it retaliatory, nothing else. Time you left it doesn't matter at all. Feedback should be standalone, and not dependent on, or in reference to, anything in his feedback to you.
But we've already told you all this. I understand you want to complain; that's human nature. Go ahead, but understand those two key points.
How can i both take out the line that says its negative and yet still say it was negative???? its a negative feedback cos it was a negative experience.
the feedback is already a lie, cos you have it as neutral, when its not. and you'd have me lie further.
And you should understand this: all negative feedback will always be retaliatory. No way around it. Most of the time it will retaliate to something in the game or the game chat. So to then allow people to complain because a feedback message is retaliatory is a paradox anyway.
I wouldnt have ever had to complain, would I, if my negative for him was not deleted. And why, for god sake, should i not be able to refer to his feedback? it's just non sensical. If his feedback is refering to the game, its part of the game. so why shouldnt i refer to it?
And the last feedback i left was, by your definition, 'stand alone'. yet you still delete it because i used the word negative. but ive already told you this. and the outcome is the same.
i do understand where you are coming from. i played some guy - his first game, he beat me
- he left me neg for getting beat by a new guy. the whole game he was accusing me of cheating with the dice. so, i left him a negative because he was a jerk and accusing me of cheating even though he was clearly winning. anyhoo, i sent an e-ticket, got his feedback removed because it was NOT factual, but mine was also deleted for being obviously retalitory feedback. which, i suppose it was. i wouldn't have left him a neg, if he had not left me one because i really hate leaving negative feedback and have only done it for a couple multis.
so, i understand. i hated that my feedback was erased, but had i not mentioned his, it wouldn't have been. he sucked even before he left me the feedback.
this rule is a good rule imo. otherwise real jackasses could be leaving retalitory feedback when they truly deserved the one they got. i don't think we want that.
oh, and i asked before if you had sent him a message about removing it because i tried that too, and the guy wouldn't remove it. owenshooter sent him one for me too, and he wouldn't remove it.
sorry for the novel long response.
