If you could meet ANY 1 person in history, who and why?

by **nagerous** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:28 pm

Gotta be Gandhi, just so he could inspire me.

by **apey** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:38 pm

I think that I would like to meet the missing link

by **DirtyDishSoap** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:40 pm

Id like to meet Eve

My reasons are my own 8-[

by **nagerous** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:42 pm

Yes but if you meet Eve you have to be a one woman person Dish Soap otherwise every other person you meet their would be the potential that your relationship is incestual.

by **DirtyDishSoap** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:45 pm

Im only going there to shake her hand perv!

by **apey** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:46 pm

roflmao

by **nagerous** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:50 pm

Nice edit, it originally said I can live with that.

And

implies something a little more than hand-shaking...

by **DirtyDishSoap** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:51 pm

Ya i thought that'd be funnier :wink:

by **brooksieb** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:31 pm

my choices

Jesus: well i am christian so why not also i would ask him how to solve today's problems

Mohammed: well same reasons

Adolf hitler: (about 1940 hitler) to ask him questions and sit on his lap stroking my hair and telling me how good of a aryan i am (i'm kidding about sitting on lap business though

)

and a relative of mine

by **Skoffin** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:33 pm

William the conqueror, I want tips.

by **suggs** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:06 pm

Thinking more deeply about it, it would have to be me.

by **cajun_tripod** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:14 pm

Page four and I'm the first person saying Elvis?

Not just because of the whole rock and roll thing but also because from

many accounts he would have been a pleasant guy to sit down and chat

with.

Harry Houdini would be an interesting one, too. Again, he was a genuis at

escape artistry but perhaps even smarter at self-promotion.

I can also understand the curiosity when it comes to meeting ancestors,

or even your parents when they were younger to see if they were every

people. Probably not.

by **suggs** on Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:16 pm

apey wrote:I think that I would like to meet the missing link

I thought scientists had proved YOU ARE the missing link

by **autoload** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:01 am

Whichever skinny chick in the history of the planet that had the biggest set of natural tits.

by **muy_thaiguy** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:03 am

autoload wrote:Whichever skinny chick in the history of the planet that had the biggest set of natural tits.

Dolly Parton?

by **Kid_A** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:41 am

autoload wrote:Whichever skinny chick in the history of the planet that had the biggest set of natural tits.

This is the best possible answer to this question.

Thank you, well done

by **autoload** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:58 am

muy_thaiguy wrote:
autoload wrote:Whichever skinny chick in the history of the planet that had the biggest set of natural tits.
Dolly Parton?

Hers aren't natural, and there are actually women that have bigger boobs that are natural and skinny.

by **muy_thaiguy** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:05 am

autoload wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
autoload wrote:Whichever skinny chick in the history of the planet that had the biggest set of natural tits.
Dolly Parton?
Hers aren't natural, and there are actually women that have bigger boobs that are natural and skinny.

The only reason they ain't natural is because she had them reduced in size, a couple times.

by **autoload** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:08 am

Oh stop it muy_thaiguy. You are being facetious now.

by **Incandenza** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 3:56 am

Kid_A wrote:
autoload wrote:Whichever skinny chick in the history of the planet that had the biggest set of natural tits.

This is the best possible answer to this question.

Thank you, well done

I hear that Joan of Arc was a D-cup who loooooved it in the butt.

by **Dancing Mustard** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:03 am

Indeed that's the only way she'd take it.
Her over-literal Frankish interpretation of the bible led her to conclude that "aving eet up l'pooper" was not "sex" per se, and thus could be indulged in with furious and unwedlocked abandon.

In other news, when the English burned her they didn't have to use rope to secure her to the stake. Coincidence? You decide.

by **muy_thaiguy** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:06 am

autoload wrote:Oh stop it muy_thaiguy. You are being facetious now.

What's your point?

by **Incandenza** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:39 am

Dancing Mustard wrote:Indeed that's the only way she'd take it.
Her over-literal Frankish interpretation of the bible led her to conclude that "aving eet up l'pooper" was not "sex" per se, and thus could be indulged in with furious and unwedlocked abandon.

In other news, when the English burned her they didn't have to use rope to secure her to the stake. Coincidence? You decide.

Never thought I'd say this, but.... Well played. Well played indeed.

by **autoload** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:52 am

muy_thaiguy wrote:
autoload wrote:Oh stop it muy_thaiguy. You are being facetious now.
What's your point?

My point is I used to think you were OK, but now realize you are just another dumbass now who engages in arguments just for the sake of increasing his post count.

by **suggs** on Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:54 am

I disagree.

The BIG 4379!

If you could meet ANY 1 person in history, who and why?

Who is online