Moderator: Community Team
Lucky Se7en wrote:I remember reading somewhere about some astonishing percent of people who are infected with HPV. The thing is most of the people don't even realize they have it because the side effects don't even show on around 90%? of people who are infected.
radiojake wrote:This whole culture of 'women being 'sluts' if they sleep around', yet a male in the same situation is a 'champ' or a legend, of some sort, is pretty backdated and has got to change.
Harijan wrote:radiojake wrote:This whole culture of 'women being 'sluts' if they sleep around', yet a male in the same situation is a 'champ' or a legend, of some sort, is pretty backdated and has got to change.
This double standard exists out of necessity. If everyone was a champ for sleeping around we would all still be living in caves and chasing our KFC (all between fantastically great cave orgies).
I laugh when people bring up the sex double standard. A classic case of short-sighted idealism.
radiojake wrote:So why is it that it is the girls who are dirty dirty sluts for picking up diseases? You do realise that they have to sleep with someone else who is also involved in the transmission of the disease (i.e men)
This whole culture of 'women being 'sluts' if they sleep around', yet a male in the same situation is a 'champ' or a legend, of some sort, is pretty backdated and has got to change.
But yes, clearly America's sex education policy is doing wonders
bedub1 wrote:radiojake wrote:So why is it that it is the girls who are dirty dirty sluts for picking up diseases? You do realise that they have to sleep with someone else who is also involved in the transmission of the disease (i.e men)
This whole culture of 'women being 'sluts' if they sleep around', yet a male in the same situation is a 'champ' or a legend, of some sort, is pretty backdated and has got to change.
But yes, clearly America's sex education policy is doing wonders
I apply the same standard to men as women.
Frigidus wrote:bedub1 wrote:radiojake wrote:So why is it that it is the girls who are dirty dirty sluts for picking up diseases? You do realise that they have to sleep with someone else who is also involved in the transmission of the disease (i.e men)
This whole culture of 'women being 'sluts' if they sleep around', yet a male in the same situation is a 'champ' or a legend, of some sort, is pretty backdated and has got to change.
But yes, clearly America's sex education policy is doing wonders
I apply the same standard to men as women.
But women have no wangs. How do you account for that?
radiojake wrote: But yes, clearly America's sex education policy is doing wonders
got tonkaed wrote:Frigidus wrote:bedub1 wrote:radiojake wrote:So why is it that it is the girls who are dirty dirty sluts for picking up diseases? You do realise that they have to sleep with someone else who is also involved in the transmission of the disease (i.e men)
This whole culture of 'women being 'sluts' if they sleep around', yet a male in the same situation is a 'champ' or a legend, of some sort, is pretty backdated and has got to change.
But yes, clearly America's sex education policy is doing wonders
I apply the same standard to men as women.
But women have no wangs. How do you account for that?
Sffalse...what about women with enlarged clitoris's?
How embarrising is it that im not sure if thats right way to pluralize clitoris.
Frigidus wrote:got tonkaed wrote:i know but clitorises?
that cannot possibly be right. I feel as if i need help finding the thing now.
The plural forms are clitorises in English and clitorides in Latin.
Thank you wikipedia!
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:This thread's content falls well below the expectations its title creates.
Shame on you all.
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap, mookiemcgee