Moderator: Community Team
philh wrote:I may have missed something; I go out for the day and like 10 pages pop up.
William's thinking that the cop claiming to protect a town would be a mistake is silly, but not necessarily scummy. The same goes for yorkie's thinking that William's silliness is scummy.
If there are four mafia, and all the claims are correct, that leaves two towns out of the six who haven't claimed. I know one of them to be myself, and if Iliad is cop we (I) deduce that william, cena, skoffin and ice are the scum. I'm going to wait for Iliad to claim or not before I do anything, though.
philh wrote:I may have missed something; I go out for the day and like 10 pages pop up.
William's thinking that the cop claiming to protect a town would be a mistake is silly, but not necessarily scummy. The same goes for yorkie's thinking that William's silliness is scummy.
If there are four mafia, and all the claims are correct, that leaves two towns out of the six who haven't claimed. I know one of them to be myself, and if Iliad is cop we (I) deduce that william, cena, skoffin and ice are the scum. I'm going to wait for Iliad to claim or not before I do anything, though.
Do you really think I'm the godfather? Do you really think I would be pushing for people's lynches if I knew they were town and I knew that I would get killed.william18 wrote:The only reason im not voting for you or explainThis is because im have a strong feeling that Ilaid is Godfather.
Iliad wrote:Do you really think I'm the godfather? Do you really think I would be pushing for people's lynches if I knew they were town and I knew that I would get killed.william18 wrote:The only reason im not voting for you or explainThis is because im have a strong feeling that Ilaid is Godfather.
No I'm not a godfather but I'm not a cop either
Our best lead huh? Since when was yorkie peter out in the clear?icedagger wrote:I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got
vote Iliad
Iliad wrote:Our best lead huh? Since when was yorkie peter out in the clear?icedagger wrote:I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got
vote Iliad
I am a simple townie
icedagger wrote:Iliad wrote:Our best lead huh? Since when was yorkie peter out in the clear?icedagger wrote:I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got
vote Iliad
I am a simple townie
Explain the case against yorkie
I will go back to re-read in a mintue but yorkie made a shitty argument agaisnt ET which frankly to my eyes was a very blunt attempt to off a power roleicedagger wrote:Iliad wrote:Our best lead huh? Since when was yorkie peter out in the clear?icedagger wrote:I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got
vote Iliad
I am a simple townie
Explain the case against yorkie
it seems that I'm not on cc every minute sorry!william18 wrote:It seems he has dodged the question, my vote still stays.
yorkiepeter wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:i say we vote no lynch
Hmm, this puts sam back in the spotlight....surely a no lynch can only help scum.....now why would sam want to do that?
I'm on the verge of changing my vote back to sam but for now I want to hear him answer as to why he is pushing for a scum preferred option
yorkiepeter wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:so u didnt get anyone...
so wait, we have how many townies left? and my role is now nothing. we better have a cop or sumin...
well ET claims to be ranger which I think is the same. But he says he was blocked last night and so can't give us any information.
I don't know, it could be an excuse not to commit to giving us a name to clear or lynch on the other hand scum knew his role and i suppose blocking him could be expected.
Surely though if he is not scum then he would have been killed last night instead of lovo. There has been no counter claim, but then if he weren't ranger would the real ranger have blown his cover by counterclaiming? probably not.
Evidence is a little shaky, but in the absence of anything else vote ET
I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very importanticedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.
William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
Iliad wrote:I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very importanticedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.
William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
yeah I did once I got back to the threadicedagger wrote:Iliad wrote:I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very importanticedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.
William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
Yes but you didn't unvote after he claimed didja
Iliad wrote:yeah I did once I got back to the threadicedagger wrote:Iliad wrote:I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very importanticedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.
William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
Yes but you didn't unvote after he claimed didja
I personally don't remember but I remember believing him. In fact I later posted when the deadline was issued and voted kiwi who was submarining(I think)icedagger wrote:Iliad wrote:yeah I did once I got back to the threadicedagger wrote:Iliad wrote:I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very importanticedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.
William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
Yes but you didn't unvote after he claimed didja
Not true. You posted maybe 8 or 9 times before unvoting. I can provide quotes if nessecary
icedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.
William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
icedagger wrote:Ok I've just read through the entire thread and here are my thoughts on everyone-
1. Skoffin- Skoffin has contributed very little, could be scum or could be town. Was on Kiwi bandwagon but no others- undecided on her.
2. ExplainThis- Having read through the thread I feel very strongly ET isn't scum, but does have a strange play style. Was on Kiwi and Amazzony wagons. However, if he's lying about being tracker I think we probably either have a real tracker or a cop. If it's a tracker, he would have counterclaimed. If cop, ET would almost certainly have been investigated by now, so I think ET's town.
william18 wrote:I suggest philh or Skoffin. The probability of getting a mafia is 50%.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users