Retalitory Feedback? [Outdated]

[risk master2000]

Can someone please define what is retalitory feedback and what must be shown to define a feedback as retalitory?

Is it just if you leave a negative feedback after someone has already left you one or does there have to be something more?

Please help me to get a clear definition

[yeti_c]

If one person leaves valid feedback...

And the other person retailates with non valid feedback...

C.

[KoE_Sirius]

Unless the feedback content mentions it..Its not retalitory.Even if it is lol

[risk master2000]

Unless the feedback content mentions it..Its not retalitory.Even if it is lol

lol Huh???

[KoE_Sirius]

Yeah...Its complicated.

[risk master2000]

Yeah...Its complicated.

what about if they tell you like my poll they are going to leave it via PM?

[Kemmler]

stop moaning about one bloody feedback..

[risk master2000]

stop moaning about one bloody feedback..

Do not post then if it bothers you.

I believe the point needs to be clear and defined since there are rules they should be followed, if there are guidlines and a definition let us get it clarified if there is any questions. I am not the 1st to have this issue i know that, but so others who are quiet on it for fear of people like you will have a sounding post I make this an issue.

[sparkyball]

Why is someone with 28 negative feedbacks really worried about one more

[wicked]

If you get a PM like that, forward it to me... hit the "quote" button, then just change who it's going to in the first box to my name.

If the feedback left is in response to the feedback someone received (and we can tell that by reading it), it'll be deemed retaliatory.

[Jock Bomb]

ome on lets face, just read through it all! Almost every neg feedback it retaliation! If 2 players do not hit it off its going to be back slap for back slap!

You would have to remove all the neg feedback just about!

Just let it flow, people can make up their own minds! We all play different games and these will cross paths ending in similar feedback from both!

I think u can get too over protective about neg feedback.

Abusive should without doubt be removed but if they are knock for knock, insurance companies dont care so why should you guys?

Let it roll, if your threatened by PM, contact the admin?

[owenshooter]

Why is someone with 28 negative feedbacks really worried about one more

ha!! that is a pretty good question.. however, i think the situation he described is retalliatory and/or threatening...-0

[risk master2000]

Why is someone with 28 negative feedbacks really worried about one more

ha!! that is a pretty good question.. however, i think the situation he described is retalliatory and/or threatening...-0

yeah not arguing I have a lot of negs but this one is clearly retalitory with history matching it

[KoE_Sirius]

Yeah...Its complicated.

what about if they tell you like my poll they are going to leave it via PM?

What difference would that matter..If they leave negative they leave negative.I can't see it meaning much.I have negative feedback saying what a bad playing I am, by ppl who have havent got a clue how to play.As this is the only way to measure a persons ability and not someone elses opinon.The feedback left has no meaning.
The whole feedback system is pointless.

[risk master2000]

I am baffled no straight response on my question other then wickeds, if some one threatens you via PM multiple times that if you do not remove your negative is it or is it not a retalitory feedback???

[wicked]

I am baffled no straight response on my question other then wickeds, if some one threatens you via PM multiple times that if you do not remove your negative is it or is it not a retalitory feedback???

lol that's because this is a case for a feedback moderator (i.e. me) and not a matter of public decision. If you get those PMs, forward to me.

[KoE_Sirius]

I did answer you.If they threat.Let them.What difference does it make that they are sending you a warning of a negative feedback.
Let them leave it..Then appeal.

[risk master2000]

I am baffled no straight response on my question other then wickeds, if some one threatens you via PM multiple times that if you do not remove your negative is it or is it not a retalitory feedback???

lol that's because this is a case for a feedback moderator (i.e. me) and not a matter of public decision. If you get those PMs, forward to me.

I have forwarded them to you a few days ago and I also posted long before feedback was left the harrassing Pm's in cheating and abuse section of forum I went to help for moderation and have been told that the feedback is valid even after all the posting i did in advance of recieving it and at time of recieving pms. So I have placed it in open forum so maybe there be some clarity made and hopefully clear guidlines as to what things must be proved for a feedback to be retalitory

[wicked]

Yes I rec'd all those, just haven't had a chance to go through them yet.

[Jock Bomb]

If one person leaves valid feedback...

And the other person retailates with non valid feedback...

C.

See this is what I DO NOT understand, so the person first to leave it is right and the reply is not when they both have VALID feedback? It makes them both invalid or neither invalid.

You cant pick who is right or wrong if there was in game problems? One said something, the other said something else in game etc.... they are both valid points and to delete one is favouring the first to post the feedback, its not retaliation if both have valid but similar points!

[benjij]

Can someone please define what is retalitory feedback and what must be shown to define a feedback as retalitory?

Is it just if you leave a negative feedback after someone has already left you one or does there have to be something more?

Please help me to get a clear definition

all feedback systeme no good
it that simple

[wrestler1ump]

Things that could be seen as retaliatory:
-Mentioning player winning
-Mentioning player leaving negative feedback
-Mentioning player putting you on his ignore list

[wicked]

If one person leaves valid feedback...

And the other person retailates with non valid feedback...

C.

See this is what I DO NOT understand, so the person first to leave it is right and the reply is not when they both have VALID feedback? It makes them both invalid or neither invalid.

You cant pick who is right or wrong if there was in game problems? One said something, the other said something else in game etc.... they are both valid points and to delete one is favouring the first to post the feedback, its not retaliation if both have valid but similar points!

What you quoted is not correct, and not what we look at. Timestamps are the last thing looked when determining if it's retaliatory. It's never a case of who left theirs first.

[risk master2000]

I have done all that was asked and keep getting the run around 1st I am told there is no way to verify the PM's due to privacy issues otherwise they would be considered then when I give full access to my account to the person who said it they refuse to even look.

where is the consistancy here,