greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:Chris Hansen wasn't around back then, so we can't know that for sure...
are you trying to suggest that Christ was a paedophile ?
I'm suggesting that you are ridiculous.
Moderator: Community Team
greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:Chris Hansen wasn't around back then, so we can't know that for sure...
are you trying to suggest that Christ was a paedophile ?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:Chris Hansen wasn't around back then, so we can't know that for sure...
are you trying to suggest that Christ was a paedophile ?
I'm suggesting that you are ridiculous.
greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:Chris Hansen wasn't around back then, so we can't know that for sure...
are you trying to suggest that Christ was a paedophile ?
I'm suggesting that you are ridiculous.
the prophet Mohammad was a paedophile which allows muslims to claim it is a part of their culture and you're calling me ridiculous.
it is ridiculous that anyone would claim their religion made them rape 9 year old girls.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:Chris Hansen wasn't around back then, so we can't know that for sure...
are you trying to suggest that Christ was a paedophile ?
I'm suggesting that you are ridiculous.
the prophet Mohammad was a paedophile which allows muslims to claim it is a part of their culture and you're calling me ridiculous.
it is ridiculous that anyone would claim their religion made them rape 9 year old girls.
Guiscard wrote:greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:Chris Hansen wasn't around back then, so we can't know that for sure...
are you trying to suggest that Christ was a paedophile ?
I'm suggesting that you are ridiculous.
the prophet Mohammad was a paedophile which allows muslims to claim it is a part of their culture and you're calling me ridiculous.
it is ridiculous that anyone would claim their religion made them rape 9 year old girls.
And you are aware of ages of consent and of marriage in the Christian world historically, yes?
Napoleon Ier wrote:Guiscard wrote:greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:Chris Hansen wasn't around back then, so we can't know that for sure...
are you trying to suggest that Christ was a paedophile ?
I'm suggesting that you are ridiculous.
the prophet Mohammad was a paedophile which allows muslims to claim it is a part of their culture and you're calling me ridiculous.
it is ridiculous that anyone would claim their religion made them rape 9 year old girls.
And you are aware of ages of consent and of marriage in the Christian world historically, yes?
And you are aware that Our Lord never commited acts of genocide, paedophilia, or terrorism, yes?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neutrino wrote:...Detecting distinct lack of adequate response to query...
...Napoleon's credibility diminishing...
Napoleon Ier wrote:Guiscard wrote:greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:greenoaks wrote:Neoteny wrote:Chris Hansen wasn't around back then, so we can't know that for sure...
are you trying to suggest that Christ was a paedophile ?
I'm suggesting that you are ridiculous.
the prophet Mohammad was a paedophile which allows muslims to claim it is a part of their culture and you're calling me ridiculous.
it is ridiculous that anyone would claim their religion made them rape 9 year old girls.
And you are aware of ages of consent and of marriage in the Christian world historically, yes?
And you are aware that Our Lord never commited acts of genocide, paedophilia, or terrorism, yes?
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
Napoleon Ier wrote:Neutrino wrote:...Detecting distinct lack of adequate response to query...
...Napoleon's credibility diminishing...
No, he said "neither did Allah", I then specified I was referring to the Second Person of the Holy Trinity's incarnate form, not God the Father (the Muslim equivalent, very broadly, to Allah).
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:Neutrino wrote:...Detecting distinct lack of adequate response to query...
...Napoleon's credibility diminishing...
No, he said "neither did Allah", I then specified I was referring to the Second Person of the Holy Trinity's incarnate form, not God the Father (the Muslim equivalent, very broadly, to Allah).
I'm not so sure that Mohammed is really of the same nature (at least in the main body of Islam, but I could be wrong; I'm no expert) that Jesus is raised up to be. Then again, I'm not really up to speed on the fuzzy logic embodied by the strange ménage à trois associated with Catholicism...
Napoleon Ier wrote:Neutrino wrote:...Detecting distinct lack of adequate response to query...
...Napoleon's credibility diminishing...
No, he said "neither did Allah", I then specified I was referring to the Second Person of the Holy Trinity's incarnate form, not God the Father (the Muslim equivalent, very broadly, to Allah).
Neutrino wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:Neutrino wrote:...Detecting distinct lack of adequate response to query...
...Napoleon's credibility diminishing...
No, he said "neither did Allah", I then specified I was referring to the Second Person of the Holy Trinity's incarnate form, not God the Father (the Muslim equivalent, very broadly, to Allah).
I was actually refering to my previous query: "Why is Islam at fault for failing to be exceptional?".
Neoteny wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:He is infallible though, which is enough.
Except for that one time...
Who here is claiming Mohammed was infallible, exactly?
greenoaks wrote:Jenos Ridan wrote:Hologram wrote:To millions of Muslims, Muhammad is that something they care about, and depicting him in any way, especially in a satirical way, is the worst thing you could do to him, short of outright saying that he's a false prophet.
I forget what band did it, but one of their covers had Jesus masturbating in the garden of gethsemene. I didn't see a lot of Christians, even the uber-Fundies from the Bible Belt, go on the warpath like the aforementioned Muslims. I understand it offended them, but there is no reason to go all crazy about it.
And Greenoaks: Iran needs nukes like dead people need car insurance. What's the first thing they'll do? Why, nuke their neighbors in Iraq, that's what. Especally those pesky Sunnis and Kurds. From there, Israel.
That is all assuming that Israel can't just airstrike the facillity like they did will Iraq. Or that the US will not be in the region at all. Worse comes to worst, and they launch for us, we have a system that might just be able to shoot them down.
you are an american, you should know everybody has the right to bare arms
Napoleon Ier wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Obviously christianity is a religion of peace and love and Islam is only a violent and hatefull religion filled with barbarians.
I've already demonstrated how, through it's lack of recognition of the temporal/spiritual divide, and the absence of dichotomy between a religious practice and society at large, and it's violently proselytizing, Islam is a dangerous, proto-fascist religion, but this has been met only by confused squeals asserting that if one religion is barbaric, surely then all other must be too, since our glorious politically correct overlords in Brussels tell us all religions are equal...
So snorrarse, seeing as how Guiscard has refused to do so, I want to ask you in want measure your beliefs aren't just a knee-jerk "all religions must be equal, (though some, Islam in particular, are more equal than others)" reaction.
Is your belief that Islam is a tolerant religion of peace and love falsifiable, snorrarse? Or is it just more politically correct white noise you're spouting onto this forum?
Jenos Ridan wrote:So, people who are clearly unstable sociopaths should be given a gun? And dictatorships should all have nukes? So then, by your standards, every miserable tinpot dictator should be able to wipe millions of people off the face of the earth at the touch of a button. I'm I understanding you right?
greenoaks wrote:Jenos Ridan wrote:So, people who are clearly unstable sociopaths should be given a gun? And dictatorships should all have nukes? So then, by your standards, every miserable tinpot dictator should be able to wipe millions of people off the face of the earth at the touch of a button. I'm I understanding you right?
who is an unstable sociopath. Iran. based on what? biased american intelligence and media. we all know how many WMD's were found in Iraq.
as i recall the US is the only nation to drop a bomb on another nation, two in fact.
americans have also been involved in 50 wars since its inception. that is 1 every 4 and a bit years.
the US National Intelligence Estimate in November 2007 determined Iran halted work on a nuclear weapon in 2003.
it seems to me americans are due for another war and are desperately looking for a target.
Jenos Ridan wrote:They are never going to listen, Naps. You can quote verses directly from the Koran until your fingers stiffen and you begin to feel like a Dhirimi. The nature of a religion does not matter to them in the slightest, remember, "All religions are equal"?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Users browsing this forum: Evil Semp