Moderator: Community Team
role that sounds like hassle anywayYou kidding? If he's townie, we could use the bullets. We're hopelessly outnumbered, so lynching actual scum may well be next to impossible. We need as many other ways to get rid of them as possible.suggs wrote:So, yeah Cena still gets my vote. To all my fellow townis, lets just lynch him so we can speed things up.
If he really is town, we have only lost a .
EBWOPbrowng-08 wrote:You kidding? If he's townie, we could use the bullets. We're hopelessly outnumbered, so lynching actual scum may well be next to impossible. We need as many other ways to get rid of them as possible.suggs wrote:So, yeah Cena still gets my vote. To all my fellow townis, lets just lynch him so we can speed things up.
If he really is town, we have only lost a role that sounds like hassle anyway.
sorry, but that's just scummy as hell. We can't lynch someone just 'cause we're getting bored. Especially when the combined mafia are more than the town.mandyb wrote:suggs wrote:what does ebwop mean?
was wondering that myself..
I would stick to my original vote, but we do need to lynch someone and cena is as good an idea as any - if he does turn out to be a goodie, then we can always blame suggs!
so UNVOTE VOTE cena-rules
Except he's claimed. so we have more reason to keep him, seeing as there's absolutely no reason to suspect himmandyb wrote:what constitutes a good reason? - no one has a clue at this stage - seems we just have to go for someone/anyone and hope for the best - lynch no one and we're no better off on day 2 than we are now.
Quite the opposite, actually. Town needs to vote carefully. Townies are the only people actually trying to lynch the right people. Scum don't give a shit. They know who's safe, and who is a threat. Townies need to think it out first.suggs wrote:f*ck it, lets lynch browno.
UNVOTE
VOTE BROWNG-08
I like being town ,you can really vote with impunity
browng-08 wrote:Except he's claimed. so we have more reason to keep him, seeing as there's absolutely no reason to suspect himmandyb wrote:what constitutes a good reason? - no one has a clue at this stage - seems we just have to go for someone/anyone and hope for the best - lynch no one and we're no better off on day 2 than we are now.
I'm not say we have to trust him. I'm saying that since there's absolutely no evidence against him, it's too great a risk for town.mandyb wrote:browng-08 wrote:Except he's claimed. so we have more reason to keep him, seeing as there's absolutely no reason to suspect himmandyb wrote:what constitutes a good reason? - no one has a clue at this stage - seems we just have to go for someone/anyone and hope for the best - lynch no one and we're no better off on day 2 than we are now.
sure he's claimed, but does that mean anything?
Question is, is he telling the truth?
You're very keen to protect him - that makes me suspect you!
Shall have to think about this ...
browng-08 wrote:I'm not say we have to trust him. I'm saying that since there's absolutely no evidence against him, it's too great a risk for town.mandyb wrote:browng-08 wrote:Except he's claimed. so we have more reason to keep him, seeing as there's absolutely no reason to suspect himmandyb wrote:what constitutes a good reason? - no one has a clue at this stage - seems we just have to go for someone/anyone and hope for the best - lynch no one and we're no better off on day 2 than we are now.
sure he's claimed, but does that mean anything?
Question is, is he telling the truth?
You're very keen to protect him - that makes me suspect you!
Shall have to think about this ...
no.amazzony wrote:browng-08 wrote:I'm not say we have to trust him. I'm saying that since there's absolutely no evidence against him, it's too great a risk for town.mandyb wrote:browng-08 wrote:Except he's claimed. so we have more reason to keep him, seeing as there's absolutely no reason to suspect himmandyb wrote:what constitutes a good reason? - no one has a clue at this stage - seems we just have to go for someone/anyone and hope for the best - lynch no one and we're no better off on day 2 than we are now.
sure he's claimed, but does that mean anything?
Question is, is he telling the truth?
You're very keen to protect him - that makes me suspect you!
Shall have to think about this ...
So you are saying that we shouldn't lynch anybody?
Maybe I'm saying it's stupid to unquestioningly follow the noob who's spent his whole time trying to get someone bandwagonned because he's bored. But, you're right. Go ahead and vote cena off. We clearly have no time left to approach this rationally so, as suggs so aptly puts it, let's let mob mentality do the work for us.amazzony wrote:What are you saying then? That we should wait and think and then oops - deadline and nobody gets lynched and townies lose a day?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users