Moderator: Community Team
muy_thaiguy wrote:A book called "Sister Alice" is set sometime in the distant future when humans are practically (or impractically, depending on how you look at it) immortal, and can be revived from a nearly dead state. They also gain the ability to live in (or at least move through space) without needing air, gain special powers, and humans have colonized nearly every planet they could. But after that, it gets a little weird and ends up being one of those time-loop type of stories.
suggs wrote:You chaps read G. Orwell, 1984?
Dont want to bore people, suspect most have read it, but it is AWESOME.
heavycola wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
suggs wrote:You chaps read G. Orwell, 1984?
Dont want to bore people, suspect most have read it, but it is AWESOME.
Basically through playing God and toying around with Science. It explains how it happens better then I could though.kleep wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:A book called "Sister Alice" is set sometime in the distant future when humans are practically (or impractically, depending on how you look at it) immortal, and can be revived from a nearly dead state. They also gain the ability to live in (or at least move through space) without needing air, gain special powers, and humans have colonized nearly every planet they could. But after that, it gets a little weird and ends up being one of those time-loop type of stories.
Does the book explain how humans got this way?
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
got tonkaed wrote:i liked some of the elements behind 1408.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
suggs wrote:One of the great, if not THE greatest "whodunnits" ever written was
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by Agatha Christie.
It has a brilliant premise, which i cant tell you, cos it would ruin the book for you.
IF ANYONE DOES POST THE PREMISE HERE< I WILL DEVOTE THE REST OF MY DAYS TO HUNTING YOU DOWN AND SHUTTING YOUR MOUTH FOR EVER
suggs wrote:got tonkaed wrote:i liked some of the elements behind 1408.
Only saw the cusack film, but that was cool.
Did the book have a better premise? cos there wasnt really that great a premise in the film, it was just bloody good i thought.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
suggs wrote:Its brilliant isn't it?! I pretty much wet myself when i was younger, it was so clever.
Just couldn't believe it was the butler.
Shit
suggs wrote:"It was a bright, cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen".
THE BEST EVER OPENING LINE. God he was good.
got tonkaed wrote:suggs wrote:got tonkaed wrote:i liked some of the elements behind 1408.
Only saw the cusack film, but that was cool.
Did the book have a better premise? cos there wasnt really that great a premise in the film, it was just bloody good i thought.
naw i meant the film tbh....
not necessarily the immediate plot line, but everything behind why the room had to act like it did, and the issues of the self with cusacks charcter.
It was quite a bit like The Trial, only exactly the opposite.
suggs wrote:Curtain?
mandyb wrote:suggs wrote:"It was a bright, cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen".
THE BEST EVER OPENING LINE. God he was good.
Great book - I like the closing paragraph even more though..
Another great opener;
“Maycomb was a tired old town, even in 1932 when I first knew it. Somehow, it was hotter then. Men's stiff collars wilted by nine in the morning. Ladies bathed before noon after their three o'clock naps. And by nightfall were like soft teacakes with frosting from sweating and sweet talcum. The day was twenty-four hours long, but it seemed longer...” To Kill a Mockingbird - what I wouldn't give to be able to write like that....
Also loved War of the Worlds - the film too, even if it did have Tom Cruise in the lead role
suggs wrote:got tonkaed wrote:suggs wrote:got tonkaed wrote:i liked some of the elements behind 1408.
Only saw the cusack film, but that was cool.
Did the book have a better premise? cos there wasnt really that great a premise in the film, it was just bloody good i thought.
naw i meant the film tbh....
not necessarily the immediate plot line, but everything behind why the room had to act like it did, and the issues of the self with cusacks charcter.
It was quite a bit like The Trial, only exactly the opposite.
Kafka? Never read tbh
what, cusack racked with guilt and stuff? or did i miss it (could well have done)
got tonkaed wrote:suggs wrote:Curtain?
actually i think my two favorites were the A.B.C. murders and cards on the table....with an honorable mention to the Big Four
I read them when i was young so clearly all opinions against me are invalid.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users