
(him, I mean, is gorgeous. Not me. Obviously. Sorry.)
Moderator: Community Team
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
mandyb wrote:well, the way I see it is this;
the killers know each other, so it makes sense that they would also vote for the same person to a secure a kill. Of course they could be deliberately throwing us off the scent by not doing that...
Anyway neoteny, sam and fivethreeeight all voted for the same person - sam changed his vote however, so that leaves neo and fivethreeeight. I'm gonna change my vote from mac to 538 - that's my logic and I'm sticking to it - unless someone convinces me otherwise..
so unvote vote FiveThreeEight
sorry
mac46 wrote:mandyb wrote:well, the way I see it is this;
the killers know each other, so it makes sense that they would also vote for the same person to a secure a kill. Of course they could be deliberately throwing us off the scent by not doing that...
Anyway neoteny, sam and fivethreeeight all voted for the same person - sam changed his vote however, so that leaves neo and fivethreeeight. I'm gonna change my vote from mac to 538 - that's my logic and I'm sticking to it - unless someone convinces me otherwise..
so unvote vote FiveThreeEight
sorry
I like that reasoning, and I also agree with suggs that Sam is sounding suspect. I'm going to go ahead and vote 538 as well.
FiveThreeEight wrote:mac46 wrote:mandyb wrote:well, the way I see it is this;
the killers know each other, so it makes sense that they would also vote for the same person to a secure a kill. Of course they could be deliberately throwing us off the scent by not doing that...
Anyway neoteny, sam and fivethreeeight all voted for the same person - sam changed his vote however, so that leaves neo and fivethreeeight. I'm gonna change my vote from mac to 538 - that's my logic and I'm sticking to it - unless someone convinces me otherwise..
so unvote vote FiveThreeEight
sorry
I like that reasoning, and I also agree with suggs that Sam is sounding suspect. I'm going to go ahead and vote 538 as well.
Ok. My first vote was a random vote, for suggs. Once suggs claimed town, I was the first to unvote him. That would have left sam and neo voting for suggs. sam changed his vote. That leaves neo. Neoteny is the only one left voting for someone who has claimed town. Even if suggs isn't town, you think Neoteny would change his vote for the mere fact that he would look suspicious if he didn't.
Therefore, I vote: Neoteny.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
FiveThreeEight wrote:Actually I am defending myself. mac46 and mandyb are saying that I look scummy because I was paired with you in leaving my vote with suggs after his claim. I disputed that point by saying that I was the first to unvote after suggs' claim, thereby disproving their logic. If that's not defending myself, then I don't know what is.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Tripitaka wrote:FiveThreeEight wrote:Tripitaka wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:well ill unvote for now...it was only random anyway...but we need a lynch or the town is f*cked...
Hmm, did anyone else find this statement kind of scummy? Firstly unless you're mafia and you know for a fact that Suggs is town, then of course your vote is random at this stage, no need to point it out, unless you are trying to cover your back that is, should he be night killed and suspicion fall on those who voted for him. Secondly while lynching a townie would be undesirable to say the least, it would hardly mean we are screwed. With a ratio of 5:2 and very little to go on yet there is a high probability that we will ally lynch a townie, but that would still leave us in the majority. Your overreaction sounds more like an attempt to convince us that you are town, so for these reasons I'm going to have to...
FOS Sam
You make good points. However, remember that the mafia know each other. If you lynch a townie on Day 1, the odds are you'll be down two townies by the start of Day 2, seeing as how the odds are good the mafia will nightkill a townie during Night 1. So, the town may not be screwed if they lynch one of their own on Day 1, but they would be at a distinct disadvantage.
I'm not saying we wouldn't be at a disadvantage, far from it, I was merely pointing out that Sam's choice of words, sounded a little over the top, dare I say it "put-on".
suggs wrote:So who are we going to kill?
FiveThreeEight wrote:Neoteny, I know your vote isn't really pressuring suggs, but you still haven't unvoted (is that a word?). It's not much, but it's all I can go on right now.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
suggs wrote:Nope this one is a puzzle wrapped inside an enigma etc bugger off churchill.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users