
Moderator: Community Team
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Dekloren wrote:Why do they keep lieing??
All they do is lie.
Why can't they be straight foward like a government should??
Oh, National Security.
lolz.
Eh, I'm not sure how much it was. Just put that amount down for dramatic effect. The point is that it'd just be a lot cheaper to give a bunch of people settlements for poisoning than for launching the missile.PhatJoey wrote:Everyone knows that too! I left it unsaid because I thought it was pretty much self-explanatory.
But it didn't cost billions to launch that missle - I'm guessing 100 million tops because you can only count the modifications they made to the missle against it. Everything else they used was already in place.
Hologram wrote:the fuel would burn up on reentry into the atmosphere
I'm not saying that the fuel tank wouldn't survive, but that the heat of reentry would heat up the fuel inside and subsequently ignite it. Maybe I'm wrong, I dunno, but that seems the most logical to me.PhatJoey wrote:Hologram wrote:the fuel would burn up on reentry into the atmosphere
Nah. That fuel tank was strong enough to take a beating. Something that size (5,000 pounds) frozen rock solid would have very likely survived reentry. Call me naive, but I'll believe the scientists this time.
PhatJoey wrote:I heard somewhere that it needs to be mixed with something else to actually ignite. But I could be wrong.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users