Best Prank ever?

[Dancing Mustard]

any chance of you addressing the salient point about addicts ?

Magic 8-Ball says: "Don't count on it"

[Iliad]

I don't see a difference.

Then stop typing 100,000 posts on the subject and think about it.

I have thought about it, still don't see a difference. Like I said, it's worthless arguing about it with a whole forum of druggies, so I am going to stop posting about it. Kinda ruined the forum for me thought to come on and find half of them are drug addicts.

And yes, comic boy, I do know what addiction means. If everyone here wasn't addicted to drugs, they wouldn't use them.

And everybody who has a beer is an alcoholic I suppose you silly man.

Don't be silly, alcohol is not a drug.

is that sarcasm? Cause alcohol is a drug.

By definition of drug: a chemical or substance which affects the way your mind or body operates(yeah food and water are also drugs under this defintion but meh)

[Iliad]

First of all I found it pretty pathetic that Pluto thought that we are all addicts. When he started spouting his shit I fell off my chair laughing. Pity he's gone now it would've been funny as hell

[Skittles!]

I don't see a difference.

Then stop typing 100,000 posts on the subject and think about it.

I have thought about it, still don't see a difference. Like I said, it's worthless arguing about it with a whole forum of druggies, so I am going to stop posting about it. Kinda ruined the forum for me thought to come on and find half of them are drug addicts.

And yes, comic boy, I do know what addiction means. If everyone here wasn't addicted to drugs, they wouldn't use them.

And everybody who has a beer is an alcoholic I suppose you silly man.

Don't be silly, alcohol is not a drug.

is that sarcasm? Cause alcohol is a drug.

By definition of drug: a chemical or substance which affects the way your mind or body operates(yeah food and water are also drugs under this defintion but meh)

And the winner of most dense CCer goes to..... ILIAD!

[Iliad]

I don't see a difference.

Then stop typing 100,000 posts on the subject and think about it.

I have thought about it, still don't see a difference. Like I said, it's worthless arguing about it with a whole forum of druggies, so I am going to stop posting about it. Kinda ruined the forum for me thought to come on and find half of them are drug addicts.

And yes, comic boy, I do know what addiction means. If everyone here wasn't addicted to drugs, they wouldn't use them.

And everybody who has a beer is an alcoholic I suppose you silly man.

Hey sarcasm is not obvious on the interwebs. Especially in some cases

Don't be silly, alcohol is not a drug.

is that sarcasm? Cause alcohol is a drug.

By definition of drug: a chemical or substance which affects the way your mind or body operates(yeah food and water are also drugs under this defintion but meh)

And the winner of most dense CCer goes to..... ILIAD!

[Napoleon Ier]

And people have every right to indulge in these masochistic habits Mustard. However, if Cola needs his stomach pumped/expensive psychotherapy/"alternative" treatments, I don't see why the f*cker should get my tax money.

Well yes when you actually pay tax then you could argue that and throw in those who eat,drink and smoke to excess if you like. However the point we are making is that everybody who takes ' drugs ' is not an addict and it is profoundly stupid to argue otherwise.

I do. I earn money. I spend it. And 17.5% goes to Gordon's slack jawed bespectacled side kick in n. 11.

VAT is a sales tax on certain items , if you dont like it then refrain from purchasing those items Now any chance of you addressing the salient point about addicts ?

No you insufferably obnoxious little transsexual liberal, I should be able to purchase whatever items I d*mn well please without any of my money going to fund some bloody re-hab clinic for hopeless cases like you.

[heavycola]

And people have every right to indulge in these masochistic habits Mustard. However, if Cola needs his stomach pumped/expensive psychotherapy/"alternative" treatments, I don't see why the f*cker should get my tax money.

Well yes when you actually pay tax then you could argue that and throw in those who eat,drink and smoke to excess if you like. However the point we are making is that everybody who takes ' drugs ' is not an addict and it is profoundly stupid to argue otherwise.

I do. I earn money. I spend it. And 17.5% goes to Gordon's slack jawed bespectacled side kick in n. 11.

VAT is a sales tax on certain items , if you dont like it then refrain from purchasing those items Now any chance of you addressing the salient point about addicts ?

No you insufferably obnoxious little transsexual liberal, I should be able to purchase whatever items I d*mn well please without any of my money going to fund some bloody re-hab clinic for hopeless cases like you.

comic boy, may I suggest the following:

I have no wish to speak with <insert poster name> any more. His contributions to this thread have stemmed little more than a desire to descend what was a serious argument into a exchange of childish insults. I have neither the time nor the inclination to indulge him.

[Napoleon Ier]

In a way, I suppose I must concede this one to you, cola. Fair play. But still, I was trying to have a serious discussion in that thread...

[joecoolfrog]

I don't see a difference.

Then stop typing 100,000 posts on the subject and think about it.

I have thought about it, still don't see a difference. Like I said, it's worthless arguing about it with a whole forum of druggies, so I am going to stop posting about it. Kinda ruined the forum for me thought to come on and find half of them are drug addicts.

And yes, comic boy, I do know what addiction means. If everyone here wasn't addicted to drugs, they wouldn't use them.

And everybody who has a beer is an alcoholic I suppose you silly man.

Don't be silly, alcohol is not a drug.

is that sarcasm? Cause alcohol is a drug.

By definition of drug: a chemical or substance which affects the way your mind or body operates(yeah food and water are also drugs under this defintion but meh)

Im pretty sure it was sarcasm yes
Im a reasonable case study as at the age of 47 I have been abusing myself in many ways for over 30 years yet these days am positively boring in that respect. I have extensively sampled various types of narcotics including opiates and spent years gorging on massive amounts of coke, but never once came close to being addicted. I could get stoned for a week,stop, then not even think about it until I fancied getting stoned again,that was often many months. My job involved entertaining clients and I was a huge drinker but nowadays I only have the very occasional beer, cigarretes though are a different matter - to them I am addicted.
The fact is that the nature of addiction depends on the particular substance and the individual,some crave chocolate but I loathe it for example. To blandly state that everybody who takes drugs is an addict is
amazingly stupid given the medicinal nature of them, am I addicted if I take heroin for pleasure yet not if I take Morphine for pain relief

[heavycola]

In a way, I suppose I must concede this one to you, cola. Fair play. But still, I was trying to have a serious discussion in that thread...

(teh haxzor?)


Look man, you're supposed to retaliate. This isn't in the rules... what am i supposed to do with a concession?

[heavycola]

Also, to continue the threadjack, may i recommend Nick Davies 'Flat Earth news' - for many reasons (if you care abotu the press in this country you really should read this book)
But here because he reveals the heroin myth: it IS addictive, no question- but that asied it is almost completely benign. It has no deleterious effects on the body. Users are thin because they spend their money on dope and not food, and they get sick because of the shit that their street scag gets cut with.

heroin has been mythologised. Addicts who administer controlled doses usffer no ill-effects apart from addiction.

No, I am not a junkie. Never tried it.

[HungrySomali]

Also, to continue the threadjack, may i recommend Nick Davies 'Flat Earth news' - for many reasons (if you care abotu the press in this country you really should read this book)
But here because he reveals the heroin myth: it IS addictive, no question- but that asied it is almost completely benign. It has no deleterious effects on the body. Users are thin because they spend their money on dope and not food, and they get sick because of the shit that their street scag gets cut with.

heroin has been mythologised. Addicts who administer controlled doses usffer no ill-effects apart from addiction.

No, I am not a junkie. Never tried it.

Well, pursuing heroin to the exclusion of every other life goal might not be a short term negative health effect but isnt very good for you. Heroin is very addictive to some and the withdrawl symptoms can be fatal. That said, Heroin is actually quite mild when snorted rather than taken intravenously.

[comic boy]

And people have every right to indulge in these masochistic habits Mustard. However, if Cola needs his stomach pumped/expensive psychotherapy/"alternative" treatments, I don't see why the f*cker should get my tax money.

Well yes when you actually pay tax then you could argue that and throw in those who eat,drink and smoke to excess if you like. However the point we are making is that everybody who takes ' drugs ' is not an addict and it is profoundly stupid to argue otherwise.

I do. I earn money. I spend it. And 17.5% goes to Gordon's slack jawed bespectacled side kick in n. 11.

VAT is a sales tax on certain items , if you dont like it then refrain from purchasing those items Now any chance of you addressing the salient point about addicts ?

No you insufferably obnoxious little transsexual liberal, I should be able to purchase whatever items I d*mn well please without any of my money going to fund some bloody re-hab clinic for hopeless cases like you.

Insults rather than answering the question,what an appalling little snot faced cunt you are. The drawback of the internet is that it enables pompous little pricks like you to throw your bile around knowing you are safely anonymous, nappy is most appropriate because you would wet yourself if we came face to face.

[kalishnikov]

I don't see a difference.

Then stop typing 100,000 posts on the subject and think about it.

I have thought about it, still don't see a difference. Like I said, it's worthless arguing about it with a whole forum of druggies, so I am going to stop posting about it. Kinda ruined the forum for me thought to come on and find half of them are drug addicts.

And yes, comic boy, I do know what addiction means. If everyone here wasn't addicted to drugs, they wouldn't use them.

This is quite possibly the most small-minded, bigoted statement I've ever heard Mr. rider of the High Horse. What the f*ck difference does it make to you if some of the people that post here occasionally indulge in illicit substance use? None. Do we push it on you and/or try to make you become a 'user', certainly not. Do we speak of nothing but the use of said substances? Again, certainly not.

Our choices are exactly that, our choices. Not once have any of us pro-drug types recommended that a non-user do it nor have we said that it's even a good choice. And by saying all people who get stoned occasionally are addicts you've proven you're idiocy to the highest degree. Granted there is a fine line, but a line exists none-the-less.

If you're high and mighty ego is offended by the communities hobbies, perhaps you should seek a new community...

P.S.: your stats are WAY off, us 'druggies' are definitely in the minority here.

[salvadevinemasse]

I have a friend, named Blake, in maine that pulled a funny prank.. He realized his buddy Nate wasn't there and it was Nate's house Blake was staying over for a sleep over.. Nate had gone to MCcdonalds where he knew his G/F would be working..

So Blake decided to go see what Nate was up to and it was fall I think September if I remember right.. Blake took 2 of his buddies and he had a copy of Nate's car key.. Their town is about 15 blocks long in total.. Nate lived on the other side of town. Blake took Nate's car and parked it back in Nates drive way and walked the 15 blocks back to get his car.. Waited 5 minutes in the parking lot and when Nate came out Blake was basically like "Thats what you get for bailing on your friends when you've known them since you were 5 and not telling them "Hey, I'll be right back".

So Nate got back home walked the 15 blocks and found his whole car had been TP'd and done up in shaving cream. (Even the side mirrors.. every thing including inside the trunk, and back seats.)


Although I've wondered since then how he got that all out of his car..
But I thought it was kinda funny even though it was wrong at the same time in a way!

[whitestazn88]

i don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but i know of an amazing prank.

it was in an episode of south park. basically, this kid fucked over cartman, so he ended up killing his parents and feeding them to the kid via chili. hilarity ensued throughout.

[ignotus]

i don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but i know of an amazing prank.

it was in an episode of south park. basically, this kid fucked over cartman, so he ended up killing his parents and feeding them to the kid via chili. hilarity ensued throughout.

And Cartman licked his tears. Good episode!
Gotta love South Park!

[whitestazn88]

i don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but i know of an amazing prank.

it was in an episode of south park. basically, this kid fucked over cartman, so he ended up killing his parents and feeding them to the kid via chili. hilarity ensued throughout.

And Cartman licked his tears. Good episode!
Gotta love South Park!

plus radiohead showed up and called the kid a pussy for crying

[salvadevinemasse]

I love south park too!

[Napoleon Ier]

In a way, I suppose I must concede this one to you, cola. Fair play. But still, I was trying to have a serious discussion in that thread...

(teh haxzor?)


Look man, you're supposed to retaliate. This isn't in the rules... what am i supposed to do with a concession?

Piss off you insufferable cactus smoking metro. Your inability to differentiate between serious intellectual topics and facetious banter so clearly exposed on the interweb for the world tp see but confirms your utter twatish ignorance. You sir, are nothing more than a troll seeking to vomit the undigested conents of his latent memory in the form of pathetic abuse. Get a life.

(Better? )