Conquer Club

Loose and Lose?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Loose and Lose?

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:14 pm

When the hell did people start confusing these two words?
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9273
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Postby Optimus Prime on Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:19 pm

I'd like to know the answer to this as well. It seems an odd thing to get confused by.
User avatar
Cadet Optimus Prime
 
Posts: 9665
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:33 pm

Postby Frigidus on Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:25 pm

People are confused by that? Damn, we're stupid.
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:26 pm

Its getting more and more frequent...I think mankind is devolving or something
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9273
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Postby jiminski on Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:38 pm

Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!

I almost always begin to spell 'lose' with a double 'o'; instinctively it seems correct. (i correct it of course)

the 'oooo' sound is present in both words to the same degree, paradoxically it is slightly less pronounced in 'loose'.
Phonetically it makes no sense for 'lose' to have a single 'o'. it is simply historical! God bless the English!
why does the extra 'o' change the final sound to 'sssss' instead of 'zzzzzz'? just because it should!

I love etymology but it is logical for people to make this mistake.
Image
User avatar
Major jiminski
 
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm
Location: London

Postby Genghis Khant on Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:04 pm

jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!

I hope you're being ironic there.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Genghis Khant
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:02 am
Location: Cymru

Postby Sir. Ricco on Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:05 pm

I doon't knoow. That darn oo gets stuck all the time.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Captain Sir. Ricco
 
Posts: 4555
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Making kingdoms burn and bloodshed start.

Postby SolidLuigi on Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:09 pm

jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!


When does the "Bare and Bear?" topic get started, lol
Image
User avatar
Private SolidLuigi
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:33 pm
Location: Outer Heaven

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:07 pm

Im pretty sure when we got past 3rd grade we could tell the difference between loose and lose, in saying as well.
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9273
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Postby unriggable on Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:15 pm

Your an idiot.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby Snowpepsi on Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:19 pm

Optimus Prime wrote:I'd like to know the answer to this as well. It seems an odd thing to get confused by.



And totally annoys the heck out of me.
Captain Snowpepsi
 
Posts: 2767
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 2:32 pm

Re: Loose and Lose?

Postby SolidLuigi on Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:08 pm

DirtyDishSoap wrote:When the hell did people start confusing these two words?


I don't think people are confused at what the words mean, they just are horrible spellers
Image
User avatar
Private SolidLuigi
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:33 pm
Location: Outer Heaven

Postby daddy1gringo on Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:15 pm

Genghis Khant wrote:
jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!
I hope you're being ironic there.
unriggable wrote:Your an idiot.
I hope you're bring ironic.
Since this has been brought up.
Bare(v)=expose.
Bear=carry or endure.
Your=belonging to you.
You're=You are.
Their=belonging to them.
They're=they are.
There=not here, some other place.

Let me get down off this soapbox before I twist my ankle.
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Postby apey on Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:30 pm

I yuosed to bee gude at speilling untill the internet scroowed me all up
04:42:40 ‹apey› uhoh
04:42:40 ‹ronc8649› uhoh
iAmCaffeine: 4/28/2016. I love how the PL players are getting wet on your wall
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class apey
 
Posts: 3957
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: mageplunkas guest house

Postby daddy1gringo on Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:55 pm

:lol:
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:55 pm

daddy1gringo wrote:
Genghis Khant wrote:
jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!
I hope you're being ironic there.
unriggable wrote:Your an idiot.
I hope you're bring ironic.
Since this has been brought up.
Bare(v)=expose.
Bear=carry or endure.
Your=belonging to you.
You're=You are.
Their=belonging to them.
They're=they are.
There=not here, some other place.

Let me get down off this soapbox before I twist my ankle.
I didnt mind the other ones cause it kind of grows on you to do it as well

But loose and lose? Come on now, when did the shit hit the fan
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9273
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Postby Stymie on Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:23 am

daddy1gringo wrote:
Genghis Khant wrote:
jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!
I hope you're being ironic there.
unriggable wrote:Your an idiot.
I hope you're bring ironic.
Since this has been brought up.
Bare(v)=expose.
Bear=carry or endure.
Your=belonging to you.
You're=You are.
Their=belonging to them.
They're=they are.
There=not here, some other place.

Let me get down off this soapbox before I twist my ankle.


Well you need to get back on your soap box and explain the loose and lose definitions. That is what the topic was about and you didn't explain it to us.
(Not that I need you to explain it to me.) :lol:
User avatar
Corporal Stymie
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:19 am
Location: New Mexico

Postby daddy1gringo on Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:40 am

OK,

Lose = opposite of "win" or of "find". The "s" pronounced like a "z".

Loose = opposite of "tight". The "s" is pronounced like a hiss.

btw,
Two = 2: the whole number between one and three.
Too = 1. "Excesively", as in "too many" 2. "Also" as on "me too"
To = 1. preposition indicating destination, as in "Go to the store" or "give it to him" 2. The first part of an infinitive, as in "I am going to do that" or "I like to play."

I'm getting exasperated at people using "to" for "too"

Courtesy of your friendly neighborhood semantics and grammar demagogue.
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Postby unriggable on Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:51 am

FYI daddy gringo I was being ironic. I was hoping somebody would catch that so I didn't look awkward
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby hiitsmestevie1 on Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:09 am

maybe whoever your referring to was trying to type it with expression (like "ohhhh noooooooooooo ...im gonna loooooooooooooooooose" except not to that extent) or it can be a typo.(we all know i have enough of those;)
Image
A relationship is like playing doubles *flat rate or esc*..If you don't have a good partner, you better have a good hand!
User avatar
Lieutenant hiitsmestevie1
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: connecticut

Postby sully800 on Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:26 am

The problem is that the english language has no consistent rules.

Lose, loose
Chose, Choose

Lose rhymes with choose, despite the spellings. Loose rhymes with moose, and chose rhymes with hose, but loose/choose and lose/chose do not rhyme.

It has never been a problem for me, and the people who screw it up are very annoying....but I still blame it on English primarily.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Postby daddy1gringo on Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:53 am

hiitsmestevie1 wrote: ...whoever your referring to...
Gaaaa! ](*,) ...whoever you're referring to... ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Postby CrazyAnglican on Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:58 am

sully800 wrote:The problem is that the english language has no consistent rules.



I blame the French. English was such a nice little Germanic language until William the Conqueror came in with his French speaking Viking wanabees and well the rest is history. The whole things history actually. I'll shut up now. :oops:
Image
User avatar
Corporal CrazyAnglican
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:16 pm
Location: Georgia


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users