Liberals on CC can't make decent arguments

[Iliad]

what's weird this is 50% and yet no-one who posted in this thread has supporeted brad

probably because they don't want to be called a moron or whatever else you dumb twits come up with

Come on everyone this is your chance to let your voice be heard and let these punks know they are the brainiacs they think they are

Using your type of logic shouldn't liberals be cowards? And not everyone else?

Or is maybe because we do have intellegent arguments unlike you.

[Skittles!]

Iliad is a liberal? News to me.

[Iliad]

no I'm extreme right wing!

[muy_thaiguy]

no I'm extreme right wing!

It's a Nazi!

*Grumbles about Aussie Politics*

[Frigidus]

Come on everyone this is your chance to let your voice be heard and let these punks know they are the brainiacs they think they are

Maybe this is some sort of trap you set to see just how nit picky we are, but this was pretty funny.

[Iliad]

no I'm extreme right wing!

It's a Nazi!

*Grumbles about Aussie Politics*

Not the grumble! Nein!

[MeDeFe]

There are nazis in Australia?

[Skittles!]

There are nazis in Australia?

Most probably.

[MeDeFe]

There are nazis in Australia?

Most probably.

ok, in that case what was said above makes sense.

[suggs]

Bradly, commiserations on the lobotomy.
But you really suck through that straw with style.
Lets get on to the Alpahbet soon!
Nod once for yes, twice for "I'm a right wing rectionary moron".

Oh you are? Well, no harm in that, grab your pointed hat in the corner and be off with you.

What a waste a spac you are. Read some Rawls and get back to me.

[Dancing Mustard]

probably because they don't want to be called a moron or whatever else you dumb twits come up with

I'd reply, but my computer just got hit with an ironic bar.

Seriously are you trying to undermine yourself with this flagrantly hypocritical poll, or is the fact that you're committing the very sin you rail against lost on you?


(Yes yes, "waaah you're being a smartass", but perhaps we'd be serious with you if you'd try to be serious with us... just a thought Space Cowboy)

[Guiscard]

Meh. Bring up some of the old threads about Iraq and US foreign policy for some of the best argument and debate from both sides I've seen on CC. There's just not been enough meat recently.

[luns101]

Not sure what you're trying accomplish here, bradley. It's one thing to have a topic to disagree about and quite another to try and purposely make it personal. As a conservative, all you have to do is stand up for what you believe and you'll be called a name. Don't go and try to make yourself look like a martyr though.

[unriggable]

Luns, we're not crucifying you the way we are bradley, since you can stand your ground against verbal attacks. This guy is clearly a total tool, and is unable to go one post without insulting himself.

[Neutrino]

Not sure what you're trying accomplish here, bradley. It's one thing to have a topic to disagree about and quite another to try and purposely make it personal. As a conservative, all you have to do is stand up for what you believe and you'll be called a name. Don't go and try to make yourself look like a martyr though.

I think you're being a little one-sided here. Both sides have idiots who delight in nothing more than using the other faction's name as an insult. Liberals who stand up for what they believe in are just as likely to attract badly-informed attacks.

[Snorri1234]

Not sure what you're trying accomplish here, bradley. It's one thing to have a topic to disagree about and quite another to try and purposely make it personal. As a conservative, all you have to do is stand up for what you believe and you'll be called a name. Don't go and try to make yourself look like a martyr though.

I think you're being a little one-sided here. Both sides have idiots who delight in nothing more than using the other faction's name as an insult. Liberals who stand up for what they believe in are just as likely to attract badly-informed attacks.

Yeah. Just try arguing with Nappy...

[Napoleon Ier]

Not sure what you're trying accomplish here, bradley. It's one thing to have a topic to disagree about and quite another to try and purposely make it personal. As a conservative, all you have to do is stand up for what you believe and you'll be called a name. Don't go and try to make yourself look like a martyr though.

I think you're being a little one-sided here. Both sides have idiots who delight in nothing more than using the other faction's name as an insult. Liberals who stand up for what they believe in are just as likely to attract badly-informed attacks.

Yeah. Just try arguing with Nappy...

Well, you generally ask for studies to prove a point. Which, when one is debating say, the ontological argument, is kind of tricky.

Then again snorri, I do make a point of only insulting goons like you who proclaim absurdities of the sort that "there is no absolutely no evidence for God at all".

Or again, your classic "anyone who thinks gays can't adopt is a bigot".

[Guiscard]

Not sure what you're trying accomplish here, bradley. It's one thing to have a topic to disagree about and quite another to try and purposely make it personal. As a conservative, all you have to do is stand up for what you believe and you'll be called a name. Don't go and try to make yourself look like a martyr though.

Come on Luns... I've not called you a bigot for bloody ages!

[Dancing Mustard]

I do make a point of only insulting goons like you who proclaim absurdities of the sort that "there is no absolutely no evidence for God at all".

Or again, your classic "anyone who thinks gays can't adopt is a bigot".

Do you have any evidence that he actually said those words... or is that just another petty aspersion?

[suggs]

Luns must be banned. He makes us Liberals look like idiots
String him up!

[Napoleon Ier]

Right, so, if I can get this straight, without "teh Bibol", there's no evidence for God?

Yeah.........Anselm, Augustine, Augustine, Leibniz, Descartes, ontological argument? Cosmological argument? Goldilock's enigma? No? I don't know, let's be adventurous, proof from Teleology?

Nope. (Goldilocks enigma is one of the worst arguments ever btw.)

I can't be bothered to dig up the gay threads, but hopefully the one will testify to the veracity of the other. Besides, unless he decided to read something vaguely related to the elementary principles of philosophy since we last had a chat, he should confirm these views of his.

Though there's some classic stuff from Neutrino, who has such a brilliant understanding of a priori logic he thinks the "a" is an indenfinite article.

[Neoteny]

Right, so, if I can get this straight, without "teh Bibol", there's no evidence for God?

Yeah.........Anselm, Augustine, Augustine, Leibniz, Descartes, ontological argument? Cosmological argument? Goldilock's enigma? No? I don't know, let's be adventurous, proof from Teleology?

Nope. (Goldilocks enigma is one of the worst arguments ever btw.)

I can't be bothered to dig up the gay threads, but hopefully the one will testify to the veracity of the other. Besides, unless he decided to read something vaguely related to the elementary principles of philosophy since we last had a chat, he should confirm these views of his.

Damn, I was thinking you were referring to me...

[Napoleon Ier]

You live in Georgia. That gives you a buffer of ridiculous comments you can make before incurring my wrath. Cretins like snorrarse who live in bloody Amsterdam though...

[Neoteny]

You live in Georgia. That gives you a buffer of ridiculous comments you can make before incurring my wrath. Cretins like snorrarse who live in bloody Amsterdam though...

So... you let me slide because I live in a state where I would normally be indoctrinated with the same crap that you think stands for a valid thought process?

[Napoleon Ier]

You live in Georgia. That gives you a buffer of ridiculous comments you can make before incurring my wrath. Cretins like snorrarse who live in bloody Amsterdam though...

So... you let me slide because I live in a state where I would normally be indoctrinated with the same crap that you think stands for a valid thought process?

I suppose you people do need to improve in the "evidence for God" department, too much inane Bible quoting going on.