Backglass wrote:DaGip wrote:Guiscard wrote:DaGip wrote:Uh? The only evidence I ever produced is provided by the NIST...check it yourself. I would have never checked up on this if Xtra hadn't mentioned it. Disprove it if you like...doubt you will.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... falls+flatStick this in your pipe and smoke it...

And Backglass has posted countless times rebutting that point using highlighted evidence from the NIST report. Which has been ignored every time. Yawn...
Guiss, are you illiterate? Backglass did nothing of the sort. The NIST clearly refutes the governments PANCAKE THEORY assertions. Read the thread and the NIST quotes provided. Otherwise just forget it, I was just responding to you claiming that I posted something that you apparent super intelligent human beings can easily refute. Well, I dare you to refute what I posted! I duble dog dare you! You can refute it, but the NIST has it written in black and fucking white! There is no
grey area on this issue. If you disagree with me on this point, then you are way off in La-La land. This has been the only evidence that I have posted since starting these forums, and it cannot be refuted. You motherfuckers ask for fucking credible fucking sources, so I take a good chunk out of my fucking day researching this issue, and I find evidence that backs up Xtra's claims. So I fucking post the motherfucking quotes and links from the NIST webfuckingsite, but yet you deny that the evidence isn't there! Let me spell it out for you:
THE NIST REFUTES THE GOVERNMENTS PANCAKE THEORY
Deny it, but it still exists, guissmeister. Backglass can yell and scream and spout out how much this is bullshit, and I don't have my facts straight...but that is clearly not the fucking case here. Read the thread I posted or just blow me.
Yes, all I do is yell & scream.

Fine. Use all the semantic games you want.
The bottom line is that we were attacked by terrorists, not our own government. There was NO controlled demolition. No evidence...just rumor, speculation and hearsay.
NIST also discredits the controlled demolition theory. Do you believe that part of the report? Or do you just choose the parts of the book that you wish to believe?
(Hmmm sounds like another group of people I often "yell & scream" at.

)
Dude, there is no physical evidence for controlled demolition of which any major organization is coming out displaying. Backglass, I will say this that the collapse of the towers looks a lot like a controlled demo, but can I say that with absolute certainty since I am not an engineer or an architect? No. So, like you, I must accept the evidence the government has droned into me. In essence, I must submit to the presentation, until those individuals that have higher credentials than me begin to make themselves known. That is currently my stance on this issue.
The point that I was trying to make is that the NIST did refute the Pancake Theory, and that has been the only evidence I have ever posted on the subject. Guissmeister made the claim that I provided evidence of which you refuted with your NIST posts, I was only making the point that that was not so.
The NIST also goes on to say that they are looking into
hypothetical blast events that may have caused the collapses. Now, my assumption what they mean by this is that since they have already stated that no evidence of a controlled demolition was found (of course they never tested for controlled demolition, you do understand that don't you?) that their next part of explaining off the collapse is by having some
hypothetical blast events that somehow took out the core. Now these could range from anything, from deisel storage tanks, propane lines, or even terrorist truck bombs used in concordance with the whole event. Thusly, the term
hypothetical, it gives them an out to contrive whatever scenerio they wish, but it stops short of making any direct claims.
So since there is no possible way for us to know (and I know all the theories put forth by the Truth movement) and since no one of the appropriate ilk is coming forward in this matter, I am at this moment forced to concede to the prevailing theory.
The importance of the United States remaining united, as sad as it may be and as cruel as it sounds, is much more important than three thousand lives that were lost on September 11.
I am the first to admit that when a new 9-11 post comes up, and if there is nothing new there, I just don't even bother with the theories and their purported evidence. I don't have to click on the links, because I have seen and read it all. The simple fact is the Truth Movement needs somebody from inside the government to step forward, the closest to that was Norm Menetta.
Now, I believe that there is more evidence that the President and Vice President were incompetent that day and now they are using this tragedy as a means to push a broader NeoCon agenda. That I think is the better issue to fight them with as far as I am concerned. But the whole 9-11 thing will just keep swimming around the fishbowl, just like the JFK assassination. It will be picked up on for awhile and then you won't here anything about it, then it will be picked up for awhile to boost ratings, then you won't really hear that much about it anymore...9-11 is heading into that same type of fad-like status.
The most important thing is the survival of the United States, it is too late to get all worked up over supposed conspiracies. Let those that have the credentials and the authority hash out the theories.
As I have quoted before from George Carlin: "...It's just fun, it's good speculation." and "The people that are in charge do what they want and they will
always do what they want. The Power
does what It wants to. And I wouldn't trust an investigation..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pow5_UYKaJ8
I wasn't posting my rant to offend anyone, I just wanted you guys to see that the NIST does indeed refute the government's Pancake Theory it tried to push on us. The government is wrong on so many points that WE as citizens have to be wary of its claims. Thusly, the war in Iraq, the uranium in Africa...the government's incompetence has given every American and nonAmerican citizen grounds to question its every move and decision. Right now, you are looking at a war with Iran. Why? Because the government is throwing scary words out again. It's the same thing, over and over. They do not have the support for a war with Iran until Iran supposedly does something seemingly evil and dastardly, or someone within Iran does something similarly likewise.
Afghanistan didn't attack us...the Taliban attacked us. Iraq didn't attack us, Sadam was just selling his oil in Euros from what I could muster. I guess that is an economic attack, but we are getting attacked economically all the time! We don't make up lies and go to war with them.
Bush has definitely made America more unsafe, even though we haven't had another major terrorist attack since 9-11. Our support in the world has diminished along with our credibility. This is going to take a while to repair. And Muslim-extremists are flocking to become terrorists. The United States is making more terrorists because of our crappy foreign policy right now.
So, anyway...I kind of got off on a tangent. All this old 9-11 stuff serves no good, as we have already talked about it again and again. If someone could post something that would really open my eyes, that would be great. Something in which none of us could refute...just like the Pancake Theory falling flat.
If anything, 9-11 should serve to unite us, not divide us! America is too important to throw it away because of some conspiracy theories.
That is my stance on the matter.