Conquer Club

Bombardment

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Bombardment

Postby HungrySomali on Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:02 pm

So if a territory you bombard only has one army you can lose an army but there is no possibility to take the single? Why not make it so you cant bombard a single army, that it needs to be two or more? Is it something in the xml mechanics? I am playing my first bombardment map (feudal wars) and it was trial and error to figure this out.
User avatar
Corporal HungrySomali
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: The Capitol of the Free World

Re: Bombardment

Postby sully800 on Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:37 pm

HungrySomali wrote:So if a territory you bombard only has one army you can lose an army but there is no possibility to take the single? Why not make it so you cant bombard a single army, that it needs to be two or more? Is it something in the xml mechanics? I am playing my first bombardment map (feudal wars) and it was trial and error to figure this out.


Bombardment is a long range attack (like firing cannons at your enemy). You are able to destroy your enemy and replace them with a neutral army, but no men of your own actually traveled to the country. You wear firing artillery at the enemy, not infantry.

Use bombardments to weaken your enemy's defenses, and then send the infantry across the ground to seize the territory.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Re: Bombardment

Postby HungrySomali on Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:43 pm

sully800 wrote:
HungrySomali wrote:So if a territory you bombard only has one army you can lose an army but there is no possibility to take the single? Why not make it so you cant bombard a single army, that it needs to be two or more? Is it something in the xml mechanics? I am playing my first bombardment map (feudal wars) and it was trial and error to figure this out.


Bombardment is a long range attack (like firing cannons at your enemy). You are able to destroy your enemy and replace them with a neutral army, but no men of your own actually traveled to the country. You wear firing artillery at the enemy, not infantry.

Use bombardments to weaken your enemy's defenses, and then send the infantry across the ground to seize the territory.


Thanks for the response.

That much I understand but how do you explain losing armies from firing artillery? Backfires? I know thats the way it has to be. My only question is why does the game allow you to attack the single neutlral that is left behind when the only possible outcome of said attack is that the attacker loses an army? Cant you make bombarding a single neutral army impossible?
User avatar
Corporal HungrySomali
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: The Capitol of the Free World

Postby Qwert on Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:14 pm

Why you bombard one neutral army? :?
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Postby HungrySomali on Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:17 pm

qwert wrote:Why you bombard one neutral army? :?


It was on the Feudal Wars map where starting out they are all neutral armies. I wasnt paying attention and accidentally attacked the neutral past 1 army. I'm sure I'm not the first person to do this.
User avatar
Corporal HungrySomali
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: The Capitol of the Free World

Postby Sir. Ricco on Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:19 pm

qwert wrote:Why you bombard one neutral army? :?
Now that has to be the dumbest move ever. :lol:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Captain Sir. Ricco
 
Posts: 4555
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Making kingdoms burn and bloodshed start.

Postby HungrySomali on Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:26 pm

Sir. Ricco wrote:
qwert wrote:Why you bombard one neutral army? :?
Now that has to be the dumbest move ever. :lol:


Thanks for the feedback... :roll:
User avatar
Corporal HungrySomali
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: The Capitol of the Free World

Postby Sir. Ricco on Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:33 pm

HungrySomali wrote:
Sir. Ricco wrote:
qwert wrote:Why you bombard one neutral army? :?
Now that has to be the dumbest move ever. :lol:


Thanks for the feedback... :roll:

sorry but you have to admit that is pretty dumb. :wink:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Captain Sir. Ricco
 
Posts: 4555
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Making kingdoms burn and bloodshed start.

Postby reminisco on Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:38 pm

Sir. Ricco wrote:
HungrySomali wrote:
Sir. Ricco wrote:
qwert wrote:Why you bombard one neutral army? :?
Now that has to be the dumbest move ever. :lol:


Thanks for the feedback... :roll:

sorry but you have to admit that is pretty dumb. :wink:


it's only dumb if he knew any better. if he's never played a map with bombardment in it, how's he supposed to know?

i've seen high ranked players get confused about that in the WWII Western Front map.

and of course, on the D-Day map, those bombardments let you send armies to what you conquered.

it's a nuance that wasn't included in the board game RISK, and so anyone new to this site cannot be expected to know how bombardment and neutral armies function.

therefore, Sir Ricco, you're a douche bag, and you're the dumb one.

a boo yeah!
have you ever seen an idealist with grey hairs on his head?
or successful men who keep in touch with unsuccessful friends?
you only think you did
i could have sworn i saw it too
but as it turns out it was just a clever ad for cigarettes.
Corporal reminisco
 
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Killadelphia, Pennsylvania

Postby Sir. Ricco on Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:41 pm

reminisco wrote:
Sir. Ricco wrote:
HungrySomali wrote:
Sir. Ricco wrote:
qwert wrote:Why you bombard one neutral army? :?
Now that has to be the dumbest move ever. :lol:


Thanks for the feedback... :roll:

sorry but you have to admit that is pretty dumb. :wink:


it's only dumb if he knew any better. if he's never played a map with bombardment in it, how's he supposed to know?

i've seen high ranked players get confused about that in the WWII Western Front map.

and of course, on the D-Day map, those bombardments let you send armies to what you conquered.

it's a nuance that wasn't included in the board game RISK, and so anyone new to this site cannot be expected to know how bombardment and neutral armies function.

therefore, Sir Ricco, you're a douche bag, and you're the dumb one.

a boo yeah!
Thank you for stating lies that will only hurt your character.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Captain Sir. Ricco
 
Posts: 4555
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Making kingdoms burn and bloodshed start.

Postby Twill on Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:45 pm

careful lads, lets not be insulting anyone here :)

Hungry...Yes, we could theoretically not allow you to attack a neutral army with a bombardment, but then, we could also stop people from making other silly mistakes like not paying attention when someone just keeps hitting attack and doesnt pay attention when it's suddenly another pair of countries because you lost all your armies (yes, I have done that many times).

We've never been too much for hand holding and part of the game is to pay attention, learn the rules, and know the features. you know, survival of the fittest and all that :)

If we have time in our coding lineup we might change that, but right now, we have some pretty big fish to fry so these things might have to wait sadly.

I'm going to go ahead and move this from GD to Q&A as well, because it fits a bit better there.

Have a good one
Twill
Retired.
Please don't PM me about forum stuff any more.

Essential forum poster viewing:
Posting, and You! and How to behave on an internet forum...on the internet
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Twill
 
Posts: 3630
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:54 pm

Postby owenshooter on Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:34 am

king achilles wrote:reminisco is busted with battlestar1776 and Adama2001.


that is all i have to say...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Sergeant owenshooter
 
Posts: 13273
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Postby Shanba on Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:45 pm

Twill wrote:careful lads, lets not be insulting anyone here :)

Hungry...Yes, we could theoretically not allow you to attack a neutral army with a bombardment, but then, we could also stop people from making other silly mistakes like not paying attention when someone just keeps hitting attack and doesnt pay attention when it's suddenly another pair of countries because you lost all your armies (yes, I have done that many times).

We've never been too much for hand holding and part of the game is to pay attention, learn the rules, and know the features. you know, survival of the fittest and all that :)

If we have time in our coding lineup we might change that, but right now, we have some pretty big fish to fry so these things might have to wait sadly.

I'm going to go ahead and move this from GD to Q&A as well, because it fits a bit better there.

Have a good one
Twill

I can understand that, but it's still not immediately obvious when you're playing said map for the first time. Perhaps somewhere in the FAQs there should be something about bombardment?
Private Shanba
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 3:06 pm

Postby yeti_c on Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:48 pm

Actually - Bombarding a 1 neutral army is a cheap way of getting a card... (in card games)

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am


Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users