Conquer Club

Tell Me Something I Don't Know

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby viperbitex on Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:09 pm

Stoney229 wrote:6 things you don't know:
#1: 27 million slaves exist in the world today
#2: that's more than twice the total number of slaves that were brought from Africa in the entire 400 years of the transatlantic "Triangle Trade"... and more than there has ever been before.
#3: the average cost of a slave in 1850 in Mississippi was $40,000 (USD adjusted for inflation)... a major investment that was protected much more than the even-more-abused, disposable slaves of today, which average $80 a person.
#4: Two fifths of the world's cocoa comes from farms that use slave labor (not just child exploitation.... but real slave labor)
#5: Millions of us indulge ourselves daily with the pleasures of chocolate and coffee at the cost of the the lives of millions, who had their lives stolen by the traffickers that we support by buying chocolate.
#6: You can, and should, make a difference, by buying "Fair Trade Certified" chocolate and coffee, which is certified to not support slavery, but ensures taht all laborers involved are paid a fair price. By refusing to buy traditional "free trade" chocolate and coffee, and instead demanding that retailers offer Fair Trade items, the Fair Trade market will grow, and major chocolate manufacturers will gradually lose the benefit they have from using slave labor cocoa/coffee, eventually ending much of the modern slave trade altogether.



I knew there was a reason I liked chocolate so much, thank you slaves!!
...it's the evil that really gives it that delicious flavor...
Good food NEVER dies!!....it just goes bad....
User avatar
Cadet viperbitex
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:28 pm
Location: AMERICA

Postby Frigidus on Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:15 pm

got tonkaed wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:To the contrary, capitalism allows free individuals to make decisions and be accountable for them. The poeple who are drowned out by the vast ocean of society are hose who live in your socialist utopias, from whom things are stolen in the name of the majority, who must conform to what the central authority, representing the uniformity of the "majority", dictates, and learn to be lobotimized servants of a totalitarian superstructure they dpn't know or understand.


do you really think that in a captialist system you are free? Certainly your not a slave in the traditional sense of the word, but can you really act in your own self interest for very long as a free person. I think its pretty fair to argue that you cannot, given the system we have at the moment.

Where again you fail to see the picture, is that im much more of an idealist capitalist, than an actual socialist napoleon. Yes there are a lot of elements of socialism that are pretty good ideas, and i thought they would rectify a lot of the ills of the system as is. Your blinded ideology of socialism however, has restricted you from seeing some of those flaws behind that convient little curtain of self interest, which is not nearly what you hold it out to be.

What will be stolen from you in socialism on a practical level? You think you really can get the full value for your work in a capitalist system? Theorectically is this even possible given the profit motive...not unless you change how you concieve of people to think of them as less than the amount of the daily labor they perform.

Alas there are problems that would make a transition from capitalism to socialism by and large very difficult if not impossible, what would we do with our consumption models, and consumerism?

Yet i know you think the communitarian ethic is slavery and the like so all of the idea must be bad. How much say do you think you really have over your own life right now? Much of a say in the politics of your country? Much control over where in the world you can live? maybe you or i have more because we live in wealthy countries, but we dont have nearly as much as you think. Not because there are overlord lizards who are holding us down, but because there are structural elements that really do erode the agency of the self that would seem rather necessary for this self interest you tout.

Also everything in the last sentence you say holds just as true for capitalist systems...its more of a product of being a member of a large society than any particular one. How much do you understand about the societal norms that affect macro scale issues? Probably not much, because its too big of a thing in large societies to understand. Sure you might take elements of it and adopt it to yourself in order to get by, but thats not understanding.


God damn, I can't go anywhere without running into an argument about the economy any more. :cry:
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Postby got tonkaed on Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:16 pm

it is actually impossible. The economy pwns your face.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby ignotus on Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:18 pm

Playboy: The first centerfold girl was Marilyn Monroe. :wink:
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.


I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
User avatar
Lieutenant ignotus
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.

Postby apey on Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:27 pm

ignotus wrote:Playboy: The first centerfold girl was Marilyn Monroe. :wink:
Wrong the first poster girl was norma jean baker who later changed her name to marilyn monroe
04:42:40 ‹apey› uhoh
04:42:40 ‹ronc8649› uhoh
iAmCaffeine: 4/28/2016. I love how the PL players are getting wet on your wall
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class apey
 
Posts: 3957
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: mageplunkas guest house

Postby ignotus on Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:29 pm

apey wrote:
ignotus wrote:Playboy: The first centerfold girl was Marilyn Monroe. :wink:
Wrong the first poster girl was norma jean baker who later changed her name to marilyn monroe


=D>
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.


I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
User avatar
Lieutenant ignotus
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.

Postby Napoleon Ier on Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:30 pm

got tonkaed wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:To the contrary, capitalism allows free individuals to make decisions and be accountable for them. The poeple who are drowned out by the vast ocean of society are hose who live in your socialist utopias, from whom things are stolen in the name of the majority, who must conform to what the central authority, representing the uniformity of the "majority", dictates, and learn to be lobotimized servants of a totalitarian superstructure they dpn't know or understand.


do you really think that in a captialist system you are free? Certainly your not a slave in the traditional sense of the word, but can you really act in your own self interest for very long as a free person. I think its pretty fair to argue that you cannot, given the system we have at the moment.

Where again you fail to see the picture, is that im much more of an idealist capitalist, than an actual socialist napoleon. Yes there are a lot of elements of socialism that are pretty good ideas, and i thought they would rectify a lot of the ills of the system as is. Your blinded ideology of socialism however, has restricted you from seeing some of those flaws behind that convient little curtain of self interest, which is not nearly what you hold it out to be.

What will be stolen from you in socialism on a practical level? You think you really can get the full value for your work in a capitalist system? Theorectically is this even possible given the profit motive...not unless you change how you concieve of people to think of them as less than the amount of the daily labor they perform.

Alas there are problems that would make a transition from capitalism to socialism by and large very difficult if not impossible, what would we do with our consumption models, and consumerism?

Yet i know you think the communitarian ethic is slavery and the like so all of the idea must be bad. How much say do you think you really have over your own life right now? Much of a say in the politics of your country? Much control over where in the world you can live? maybe you or i have more because we live in wealthy countries, but we dont have nearly as much as you think. Not because there are overlord lizards who are holding us down, but because there are structural elements that really do erode the agency of the self that would seem rather necessary for this self interest you tout.

Also everything in the last sentence you say holds just as true for capitalist systems...its more of a product of being a member of a large society than any particular one. How much do you understand about the societal norms that affect macro scale issues? Probably not much, because its too big of a thing in large societies to understand. Sure you might take elements of it and adopt it to yourself in order to get by, but thats not understanding.


Actually, as it happens, yes. Yet, and here's the magic of capitalism, through a series of Nash equilibriums, society advances, the individual is free.

To propose curtailing the rights of individuals to enter into consenting contracs based on some lofty ideal of a magical land where all the races join in peaceful harmony hand in hand sharing the fruits of mother earth whilst singing songs with the happy elves whilst showring flowers on each other is however, unfortunantly for you, most likely going to result in a serious misfiring. Russia come to mind much?

Furthermore, we don't live in a truly capitalist society. Some great minds of this past century have even suggested that the US of A, the Grand Satan, eternal bane of the pot smoking hippie leftist, is almost socialist in many respects.

Not that this matters to you, you prefer to blame teh corporations for everything gone wrong in your life. However, if people, rather than relying on Uncle Welfare, got of their asses, did some work, and got tonkeducated, we'd see some changes.

You see, fundamentally, it boils down to this : those who want to make it in this world without someone telling them how, when, where, and with what three-page form, and the weaklings who need to a system to tell them how to use their insignificant lives, and to provide them with an eternal crutch to rest their puny, pathetic, bony limbs as they wheeze and wail about how it's all teh corporations.

And guess what? It's good old fashioned capitalism and free trade that produce the results.

Here's a little diagram to help the more intellectually challenged to understand:

That's tonky's utopia, up on top, by the way...

Image
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby heavycola on Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:16 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Did you just feel like you wanted to make some patronizing comment to get a bizarre self-gratifying intellectual high?


nappy you have outdone yourself. What is the french for 'sfironic'?
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby got tonkaed on Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:35 pm

napoleon, you again failed to understand i believe the entire crux of the debate. The individual is inherently not free in a society that is forced to advance, as the individual must conform to the notions of progress, in this case capitalist notions of progress. Whether or not this is a bad thing is debatable, you certainly dont think so, i dont think so to a far less degree, but it either way does not signal freedom. If anything, the world has shown us thus far that individuals have far less freedom than such a childish notion that you hold onto in order to make the system more palatable. Rather that bore you with ancedotes that show large inequalities between wealthy and poor countries, where much of the world is poor and has very little freedom at all, ill just make the simple point.

capitalist societies in our world at present, have a tendency to drive the individuals wages down, and to create larger scale income inequalities. While this is great for the few who can make a lot of money, as the world becomes their oyster in a sense, it certainly is not great for all those who cannot. When freedom is predicated in many ways on a mobility and fluidity of resources, capitalist systems do not provide the vast majority of individuals adequate resources to be free.

Unlike you, i tend not to see the issue in stark black and whites. If i dont ascribe to your dehumanizing version of an invisible hand that somehow makes the world wonderful for everyone, then i am a socialist. Intellecutally you need to grow up a little bit. In the world in which we live and the views which we frequently discuss, i think its quite a fair criticism to claim that i am far more in favor of giving individuals rights than you are. Shockingly, this is conicided with a desire to provide adequate safety nets for individuals who live in a system that will create categorical disadvantages.

But how is this possible? How can i hold all of these namby pamby views about giving people the right to live their lives as they see fit, and try to protect them from the purer free market than i think youd want if you had the choice? There is a consistency in my views that you lack or at least dont acknowledge in your own. For all your clammoring of my socialist views, ive somehow found a way to realize that capitalist systems have the potential to create more wealth than any other system we have. The incredible hippy that i am, i somehow feel that we could find a way to balance that growth, in a way that could improve the lives of many more people. I dont ask for or expect true equality, as im not nearly as naive as youd typecast me as.

You like to pretend that by holding on to some naive notion of self interest that your making the world in your own way. sure. Yet the moment that we open up borders to allow individuals access to that right you cry about the destruction of your culture and the invaders into your way of life. Why not freedom for everyone, if we are going to be granting freedom? There are a lot of neat inconsistencies to your views, which i think is what irriates people to no end. Usually because you hide within some of these ideological stances, such as the ones you make in the last post, people dont quite see the connection.

ill sum it all up for you though,

youd rather give everyone an equal chance to fail, and create a system where in all likelyhood they would...than give everyone the same oppertunities to succeed that youve had.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby Neoteny on Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:17 pm

God... of all the things to talk about of which I could be interested in, you people pick economics... I fucking hate economics...

To jump right into the conversation, polarity is currently ruining the American political system. Let's not let it ruin any of our economics.

That's all I can bear to say.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Postby Napoleon Ier on Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:26 pm

got tonkaed wrote:napoleon, you again failed to understand i believe the entire crux of the debate. The individual is inherently not free in a society that is forced to advance, as the individual must conform to the notions of progress, in this case capitalist notions of progress. Whether or not this is a bad thing is debatable, you certainly dont think so, i dont think so to a far less degree, but it either way does not signal freedom. If anything, the world has shown us thus far that individuals have far less freedom than such a childish notion that you hold onto in order to make the system more palatable. Rather that bore you with ancedotes that show large inequalities between wealthy and poor countries, where much of the world is poor and has very little freedom at all, ill just make the simple point.

capitalist societies in our world at present, have a tendency to drive the individuals wages down, and to create larger scale income inequalities. While this is great for the few who can make a lot of money, as the world becomes their oyster in a sense, it certainly is not great for all those who cannot. When freedom is predicated in many ways on a mobility and fluidity of resources, capitalist systems do not provide the vast majority of individuals adequate resources to be free.

Unlike you, i tend not to see the issue in stark black and whites. If i dont ascribe to your dehumanizing version of an invisible hand that somehow makes the world wonderful for everyone, then i am a socialist. Intellecutally you need to grow up a little bit. In the world in which we live and the views which we frequently discuss, i think its quite a fair criticism to claim that i am far more in favor of giving individuals rights than you are. Shockingly, this is conicided with a desire to provide adequate safety nets for individuals who live in a system that will create categorical disadvantages.

But how is this possible? How can i hold all of these namby pamby views about giving people the right to live their lives as they see fit, and try to protect them from the purer free market than i think youd want if you had the choice? There is a consistency in my views that you lack or at least dont acknowledge in your own. For all your clammoring of my socialist views, ive somehow found a way to realize that capitalist systems have the potential to create more wealth than any other system we have. The incredible hippy that i am, i somehow feel that we could find a way to balance that growth, in a way that could improve the lives of many more people. I dont ask for or expect true equality, as im not nearly as naive as youd typecast me as.

You like to pretend that by holding on to some naive notion of self interest that your making the world in your own way. sure. Yet the moment that we open up borders to allow individuals access to that right you cry about the destruction of your culture and the invaders into your way of life. Why not freedom for everyone, if we are going to be granting freedom? There are a lot of neat inconsistencies to your views, which i think is what irriates people to no end. Usually because you hide within some of these ideological stances, such as the ones you make in the last post, people dont quite see the connection.

ill sum it all up for you though,

youd rather give everyone an equal chance to fail, and create a system where in all likelyhood they would...than give everyone the same oppertunities to succeed that youve had.


If you can find me evidence suggesting quality of life goes up rather than down due to capitalism, I'd like to see it.
Though no doubt you refer instead to such brilliant economic triumphs of the proletariat as the Great Leap Forward, the Kolkhozes, or maybe even the great success of the North Korean economy.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby Quinton on Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:30 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:To the contrary, capitalism allows free individuals to make decisions and be accountable for them. The poeple who are drowned out by the vast ocean of society are hose who live in your socialist utopias, from whom things are stolen in the name of the majority, who must conform to what the central authority, representing the uniformity of the "majority", dictates, and learn to be lobotimized servants of a totalitarian superstructure they dpn't know or understand.


That's the most sense I've heard in a while napoleon Ier.
User avatar
Private Quinton
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: Nomadic

Postby InkL0sed on Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:54 pm

There is a difference between communism and socialism, as I'm sure you know.

Oh and just curious, but have any of you read The Dispossessed? Interesting book that deals largely with this kind of stuff...
User avatar
Lieutenant InkL0sed
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: underwater

Postby Snorri1234 on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:09 pm

InkL0sed wrote:There is a difference between communism and socialism, as I'm sure you know.


Nono, they're totally the same. Anyone in favour of, for example universal healthcare, is a dirty commie.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby Quinton on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:18 pm

Universal healthcare? :shock: :shock:

I wonder who would implement an idea like this? And I wonder who would pay for it :roll:
User avatar
Private Quinton
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: Nomadic

Postby Snorri1234 on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:35 pm

Quinton wrote:Universal healthcare? :shock: :shock:

I wonder who would implement an idea like this? And I wonder who would pay for it :roll:


Most of europe.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby got tonkaed on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:39 pm

InkL0sed wrote:There is a difference between communism and socialism, as I'm sure you know.

Oh and just curious, but have any of you read The Dispossessed? Interesting book that deals largely with this kind of stuff...


yes i have, it touches on a lot of these ideas in an interesting way...

and for what is becoming an incredible number of times napoleon you fail to get the idea again.

It is not that the best of the best do not get the standard of living that is best in the history of the world, they in all likelyhood certainly do. Is that enough for the enormous number of people living in teh world under abject poverty? Is the relative poverty that even more people will end up living under as a result of the stratified system any better.

Not only do you miss the forest through the trees, you often forget what your looking at.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby Napoleon Ier on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:47 pm

Is the relative poverty that even more people will end up living under as a result of the stratified system any better?

Well yes! Don't be ridiculous! This is like saying the perfectly equal society of North Korea is economically better than that of the US.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby btownmeggy on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:51 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Is the relative poverty that even more people will end up living under as a result of the stratified system any better?

Well yes! Don't be ridiculous! This is like saying the perfectly equal society of North Korea is economically better than that of the US.


You don't know much about North Korea, do you? It's certainly not perfectly equal. In fact, it's more like... the opposite.
User avatar
Corporal btownmeggy
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:43 am

Postby got tonkaed on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:53 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Is the relative poverty that even more people will end up living under as a result of the stratified system any better?

Well yes! Don't be ridiculous! This is like saying the perfectly equal society of North Korea is economically better than that of the US.


actually thats not the point i was trying to make. If you look at the world on a larger scale...the fact that much of the world, not just comparing individual nation states you would perhaps be better suited to see the point.

I think your problem is your trying to turn this into a socialism capitalism debate, which ive told you isnt really what im trying to argue. I think there are many valid criticism of capitalism, which you because of some of your ideological assumptions, just dont really seem to jive with. Instead of discussing those criticism of the system, you try to draw it out to an ideological level, where i either cannot disagree with your position, without doing so in piecemeal or have to take on a position i dont actually hold.

Here is what i am saying as simplistically as possible. The stratification of modern capitalism has created a world where far too many people are living outside of a decent standard of living, and have little to no hope of improving their situation. Am i advocating we need to united the workers of the world and scrap the whole system? No im not. Yet you seem to have utterly failed to understand this for the last two pages.

I am attempting to show or discuss a number of elements of the current system which have negative consequences on humanity.

If you would be so kind as to explain what your goal is, i think we could actually discuss some of those elements, instead of going back and forth on a bunch of unrelated things.

My original point about your tacit acceptance is related to this, where as i think youve tried to steer the discussion to a place that i dont really think is either relavant to the intents of the post or correct.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby Napoleon Ier on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:54 pm

btownmeggy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Is the relative poverty that even more people will end up living under as a result of the stratified system any better?

Well yes! Don't be ridiculous! This is like saying the perfectly equal society of North Korea is economically better than that of the US.


You don't know much about North Korea, do you? It's certainly not perfectly equal. In fact, it's more like... the opposite.


I think the point is, none of us really do....still, fine, you take my point. It's better to live in a society with a really dented Lorenz curve but where the poorest person lives in a decent house than one where everyone's a hobo.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby btownmeggy on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:54 pm

btownmeggy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Is the relative poverty that even more people will end up living under as a result of the stratified system any better?

Well yes! Don't be ridiculous! This is like saying the perfectly equal society of North Korea is economically better than that of the US.


You don't know much about North Korea, do you? It's certainly not perfectly equal. In fact, it's more like... the opposite.


For example, [Kim Jong Il's] annual purchases of Hennessy cognac reportedly total to $700,000, while the average North Korean earns the rough estimate equivalent of $900 per year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_jong_il#Criticism
User avatar
Corporal btownmeggy
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:43 am

Postby Napoleon Ier on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:58 pm

^^Irrelevant pedanticism.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby btownmeggy on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:59 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:
btownmeggy wrote:You don't know much about North Korea, do you? It's certainly not perfectly equal. In fact, it's more like... the opposite.


I think the point is, none of us really do...


Well, I think that compared to you I do. I really do.
User avatar
Corporal btownmeggy
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:43 am

Postby unriggable on Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:47 pm

Image
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users