Barroom mafia. Mod is pushed off of a cliff. DRAW

by **firth4eva** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:41 am

kalishnikov wrote:I' betting all the scum have been submarining like hell this whole game.

I don't know if this is because I have a hunch that you are scum but that sounded suspiscious

Oh and also vote AD As I think he is scum too

by **kalishnikov** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:50 am

firth4eva wrote:
kalishnikov wrote:I' betting all the scum have been submarining like hell this whole game.

I don't know if this is because I have a hunch that you are scum but that sounded suspiscious

Oh and also vote AD As I think he is scum too

Fair enough but I stand by the statement. I think we are gonna be surprised who the scum is, is all I meant by that.

And you, Mr. Vig, are gonna be surprised by my role when I inevitably die in the next few days...

by **Anarkistsdream** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:12 pm

If you guys kill me, that would be a waste... As I said, I am a Mad Scientist... That means I send in a vote block at night and the next day that vote no longer counts, is the way TWO explained it to me.

But if you guys wanna lynch me, I understand. This game got real boring after a fucking 7-day no lynch

by **ga7** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:15 pm

Finally got around rereading. Well at this point I think Firth is pretty much cleared from being mafia, although he might still be SK. Nevertheless, he's obviously doing a terrific job so I reckon it'd be better to leave that matter aside for now.
Then there's Diddle, who survived the night. He may still be doc and scum figured they'd be better off killing GT, but I'm not too comfy leaving the claimed doc unchecked ad aeternum, so he most likely will get my drink today. Might be useless, but as we seem to have a fair margin in our actions might as well remove the doubt. I still wonder who got drunk today though...
Admittedly it's hard to get a read on most people as 2/3 are submarining, but I'm still convinced AD is our best bet today.

Anarkistsdream wrote:I have no interest in playing a game where people sit around with their thumbs up their asses. I have a career and school, not time to wait for someone to actually post something intelligent.

I'd like to answer to this, if you don't have the time to do a simple, quick thing as reading the thread (and I'm not talking about rereading, seeing your posts it's obvious you didn't bother looking at this game at all), then don't play. The game will certainly be better off.
Regardless, I still think you're scum, as your posts are just whining over and no actual input, some random votes, then at the beginning of today supposedly buying Illy a drink out of nowhere. Now I don't say that Illy is looking town right now as he's just submarining, but it denotes a scummy behavior; overall I have the feeling that in the odd case you're actually town it'll just be a deadweight less, which doesn't sound bad at this point.

by **Anarkistsdream** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:27 pm

I play more than some of the other people in this game, Frenchman... Go pick on them.

by **Anarkistsdream** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:29 pm

Here... As always, I'll help you out...

Unvote
Vote: Anarkistsdream

But it WILL say Mad Scientist. And unless the Frenchman has already been cleared- because no, I didn't read a 7-day no lynch thread- then he should be the next to die.

by **ga7** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:43 pm

Pretty much the same defense you used recently as scum in judgement. (Yes, metagame is bad but I like to use it whenever it's way obvious

)
I agree that some people have talked less than you, but it doesn't really make a difference input-wise. I don't even see how your role makes sense since it's like a politician except you don't get an extra vote, thus making it possibly harder on town (though I'll admit I wouldn't put it past TWO to make such role).

by **kalishnikov** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:04 pm

I believe AD, based on my role. TWO definitly has add some abnormal roles in this game.

That said, it IS the exact same thing AD did in Judgment Day and he was scum... But he won't get my vote until we have exhausted all other options, I feel he more has lost interest then is scummy and lynching a 'no-interest' is the same as lynching an inactive; doesn't really help anyone but scum but will keep the game moving in times of dire need.

by **Anarkistsdream** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:52 pm

Well, has the Frenchman been cleared already?

If not, why are people not wondering why he is pushing so hard?

Did you guys not notice that the day was 7-Days No lynch but the night seemed to fly the hell by?

Whoever is scum is paying close attention to the game.

That, in my mind, makes it look like ga7.

by **firth4eva** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:55 pm

Diddle too.

by **ga7** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:09 pm

I'm pushing cause it seems a good day to get rid of not only inactive but also scummy people. I know that role sounds like something TWO might have done, but that doesn't clear him at all IMO.
And no, I'm not cleared, though I dropped some hints at my role already (or did I? Bwahaha).
In any case, I disagree on one thing: I don't know how many scum there can be left, but I highly doubt most of them are bothering being active seeing the general inactivity. I also think keeping all inactives hanging around helps the scum more than anything (hell, that helped us a lot in stargate) :wink:

by **Anarkistsdream** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:16 pm

How did my post not POST!?!?!

Dammit...

Okay...

ga7, how can you say, "In any case, I disagree on one thing: I don't know how many scum there can be left, but I highly doubt most of them are bothering being active seeing the general inactivity."

How is it you can have a 7-day no lynch but have a night fly by? That makes no sense.

You are bullshitting.

Unvote
Vote: ga7

by **ga7** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:19 pm

How are the day length and the night length any related? Are you saying if there's submarining scum they would submarine the night too? :roll:

That posting bug is annoying...

by **Anarkistsdream** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:26 pm

ga7 wrote:How are the day length and the night length any related? Are you saying if there's submarining scum they would submarine the night too?
That posting bug is annoying...

Yes, scum that submarine and let a day drag out that long are not gong to be worried about how fast they react in the night unless they are paying attention.

Sorry, mate, but I have a sneaking suspicion you are trying too hard.

No offense if you aren't.

by **ga7** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:32 pm

I don't get what you mean. You're saying that scum laying low wouldn't send fast their night action? Why? Do you think a NK of GT takes great reflection and careful rereading?
And I'm only trying too hard if you're really town, but I still don't buy it

by **firth4eva** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:35 pm

Hmmmmmmmm. unvote

by **diddle** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:59 pm

firth4eva wrote:Diddle too.

What about me?

Anyway, I like AD's theory about a short night. And Ga7 says he wanted to use this day as a chance to lynch inactives, well in that case there would be about 4 or 5 players remaining. I also disagree with that point, because the 7-day-day came up with a no lynch. If you had been so desperate to lynch inactives, wouldn't you of made use of all that time.

by **firth4eva** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:04 pm

You are active so you could have sent you NK in fast.

by **ga7** on Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:10 am

diddle wrote:
firth4eva wrote:Diddle too.

What about me?

Anyway, I like AD's theory about a short night. And Ga7 says he wanted to use this day as a chance to lynch inactives, well in that case there would be about 4 or 5 players remaining. I also disagree with that point, because the 7-day-day came up with a no lynch. If you had been so desperate to lynch inactives, wouldn't you of made use of all that time.

I'm not desperate to lynch inactives, and while the previous day did end in a no lynch, I don't think it was that useless to go over leads etc. Right now though, since Firth did the job we couldn't do and we seem to have a fair margin to get the remaining scum, I just thought it might be a good idea to try and lynch a scummy submariner today.

by **kalishnikov** on Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:50 pm

firth4eva wrote:Hmmmmmmmm. unvote

I second that 'hmmmmm'. I'm quite stumped at the moment as to where to go with this game. There are good points on several people but they can be logically explained away.

The people I was suspicious of (firth) have either done an excellent job of hiding their scumminess or have since cleared themselves. firth if you are an SK, damn good job doing the thing you did in Thieves and tricking us all because I believe your claim.

And I'm sure that I have seen this exact AD/ga7 argument before in a different game...

by **firth4eva** on Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:33 pm

Well I'm not sk because I can't work on my own. I just go mad and paranoid. I need someone reassuring me that I am doing well. I am pretty sure kalish is town now too.

by **ga7** on Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:02 pm

Hahah, I was thinking of thieves too but at this point I believe more that Firth is a good little vig.
You're probably right Kalish as AD makes my scumdar ping in about every game he's scum and I'm town

In any case, I said my piece, and don't see other leads at the moment. Talk.