Moderator: Community Team
wicked wrote:moved to GD since it's not off-topic.
jnd94 wrote:I made a thread like this when Rev K was perma-banned.
hecter wrote:What I want to know is this:
Why is it that people who nobody (or few) like and would rather they be permanently banned from the CC forums are allowed to roam free (wrestler1ump, for example) whilst members that were loved by many are band (Norse and RK)? Is it not the job of the moderators to keep the community happy?
Napoleon Ier wrote:The Forum Death Penalty cannot be taken lightly...
wacicha wrote:Give enough 2 sided information so that the masses can make a informed VOTE.
wacicha wrote:As I stated, 2 sides are needed So now if you could get someone from the other side 2 explain their issue.
or play devils advocate....and try to express the other side's correct opinoin.
wacicha wrote:As I stated, 2 sides are needed So now if you could get someone from the other side 2 explain their issue.
or play devils advocate....and try to express the other side's correct opinoin.
hecter wrote:wacicha wrote:As I stated, 2 sides are needed So now if you could get someone from the other side 2 explain their issue.
or play devils advocate....and try to express the other side's correct opinoin.
Norse was a troll. He flamed outside of flame wars, expressed borderline racist and bigoted views and he was a downright arsehole.
But by golly, we loved him!
wicked wrote:Norse continually tested the limits here in the forums, and often crossed the line. He had plenty of warnings and timeouts and opportunities to adjust his behaviour. After this thread the other day, he was given one more chance to straighten up to avoid a permanent forum ban. Two recent racist posts yesterday/today finally pushed him over the edge:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... c&start=74
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... t=#1053518
And his comments about Polish people in the "Losing my touch" thread.
Keep in mind these were all made after he was told his very next indiscretion would result in a permanent forum ban. And he was actually given one more shot. Back in November (I believe, going off memory here), he was told then the next time he crossed the line he'd be gone. So yeah DDS, he did get "one last shot" and he blew it.
dinobot wrote:hecter wrote:wacicha wrote:As I stated, 2 sides are needed So now if you could get someone from the other side 2 explain their issue.
or play devils advocate....and try to express the other side's correct opinoin.
Norse was a troll. He flamed outside of flame wars, expressed borderline racist and bigoted views and he was a downright arsehole.
But by golly, we loved him!
Dude, how do you have so many posts? This forum isn't even interesting; it's just copy pasted walls of text about something no one cares about and people pretending to care about it. FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!
hecter wrote:1. I have no life
2. I've been here for a little bit longer than you
3. There are other, more interesting forums
V.I. wrote:wacicha wrote:Give enough 2 sided information so that the masses can make a informed VOTE.
The onus is on the Mods to provide satisfactory information as to WHY the current system is operating fairly.
Addressing Hecter's question would be a good start: Why do interesting and articulate flamers receive permabans while spam-happy posters are allowed to remain. The system is obviously flawed and is deserving of attention.
I ask you, "Wise Man", to provide some "2 sided information" to this discussion. We only hope it isn't "2 faced."
Of course, as you point out, you neither "know norse" nor "why he was banned." So perhaps you should quietly usher yourself out of this conversation, cease with the baseless interjections and bring in the Mod(s) responsible for the permaban.
Lastly, this is not "your forum" but, in actuality, OUR forum. If you'd like to be useful to your constituents, huddle up with your fellow Mods and determine WHO issued the permaban and WHY the permaban was issued.
We will not be put off with lame responses such as "offensive language" or "inappropriate comments" We want to see proof, in the form of actual posts, in determining whether or not WE THE CONQUER CLUB COMMUNITY (Majority) believes the Mods (Minority) acted with due cause.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users