Moderator: Community Team
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
suggs wrote:Get it together Mr. Cola-you can get through this. Perhaps you need another non-Hasbro affiliated meeting?
Have to respect your sig though...
heavycola wrote:Partly because I miss Xtra's insanity, and also because I like arguing, and being right, I would like to answer any and all conspiracy theories regarding 9/11. One by one. They have been makign a stealthy reappearance in teh forum recently.
If anyone would like to start with a question or statement, please do. Otherwise I win by default.
JFK conspiracy theorists were unable to comprehend that a lone gunman's actions could have had such enormous repercussions, and therefore there MUST have been darker forces at work. Nevertheless, computer modelling of Dealey Plaza in the last few years has shown that it was indeed LHO who was solely responsible for the president's death. Individuals CAN, occasionally, be the snowflake that starts a massive avalanche.
Same here. Xtra used to describe the hijackers as 'kids with boxcutters' because he could not attribute the enormity of what happened that day and afterwards to a bunch of towelheads. However, that is what happened.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
luns101 wrote:Ok here goes...
Frigidus produced pictures that Hulk Hogan was the real culprit and mastermind behind the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks. I, for one, was convinced since he actually produced genuine photographic evidence.
What really happened on 9/11 thread
Now, I dare you sir....no, I defy you to produce evidence to the contrary.
heavycola wrote:The National Wrestling Organisation... of course, it all make sense.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Norse wrote:What was the "liquid magma" type fluid, seen clearly dripping from one of the towers, in the time between "the plane crash" and the "teh pancakz0r"
Why did the towers pancake at nearly the acceleration that the gravitational pull would have produced? Other than a fragmented, "clash-clash-clash" as the tower collapsed perfectly into a heap?
Why did trade centre 7 collapse?
How was the pentagon, considering the nature of the damage, and the lack of wreckage, damaged?
Which high-ranking political bilderberger member is paying you/sucking you off?
Who the f*ck is alice?
static_ice wrote:1. In response to the basic logic that if the government was capable of getting a hold of the two planes for the WTC, they should have been able to get a hold of one for the Pentagon (instead of placing a bomb), my opponents claimed that it was a missile instead that was directed to the Pentagon. That's how they explain the smaller explosion and small hole (which they're too lazy to verify).
Snorri1234 wrote:static_ice wrote:1. In response to the basic logic that if the government was capable of getting a hold of the two planes for the WTC, they should have been able to get a hold of one for the Pentagon (instead of placing a bomb), my opponents claimed that it was a missile instead that was directed to the Pentagon. That's how they explain the smaller explosion and small hole (which they're too lazy to verify).
What I'm so curious about is that noone explains what happened to the plane that supposedly hit the pentagon. I mean, sure conspiracies are awesome, but why did they make a plane dissappear and then hit the pentagon with a missile?
static_ice wrote:I remembered that other question... something like if the whole plane crashed, why weren't there any holes or dents made from the wings and engines, in addition to the small circular hole (In the wall of the Pentagon)? This one's from an apparent expert on planes, who says that the engines and wings of a Boeing wouldn't "just break off or just explode".
P.S. I love this thread.
OnlyAmbrose wrote:This thread's gonna be really boring until the conspiracy theorists show up...
unriggable wrote:static_ice wrote:I remembered that other question... something like if the whole plane crashed, why weren't there any holes or dents made from the wings and engines, in addition to the small circular hole (In the wall of the Pentagon)? This one's from an apparent expert on planes, who says that the engines and wings of a Boeing wouldn't "just break off or just explode".
P.S. I love this thread.
Reminds me of when Bugs Bunny runs through an ice sheet, his sillhouette is preserved perfectly.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users