Conquer Club

The definitive 'why 9/11 conspiracies are rubbish' thread

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

The definitive 'why 9/11 conspiracies are rubbish' thread

Postby heavycola on Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:58 am

Partly because I miss Xtra's insanity, and also because I like arguing, and being right, I would like to answer any and all conspiracy theories regarding 9/11. One by one. They have been makign a stealthy reappearance in teh forum recently.
If anyone would like to start with a question or statement, please do. Otherwise I win by default.


JFK conspiracy theorists were unable to comprehend that a lone gunman's actions could have had such enormous repercussions, and therefore there MUST have been darker forces at work. Nevertheless, computer modelling of Dealey Plaza in the last few years has shown that it was indeed LHO who was solely responsible for the president's death. Individuals CAN, occasionally, be the snowflake that starts a massive avalanche.
Same here. Xtra used to describe the hijackers as 'kids with boxcutters' because he could not attribute the enormity of what happened that day and afterwards to a bunch of towelheads. However, that is what happened.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby suggs on Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:36 am

Annoyingly, i completely agree with you mate, so we cant have a fruity argument.
Although i always thought the JFK stuff had a bit more plausibility than the 9/11 cobblers WHICH WE ALL SAW HAPPENING!
But you're right about XtraTomato-i miss his wackiness.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class suggs
 
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Postby heavycola on Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:43 am

suggs wrote:Annoyingly, i completely agree with you mate, so we cant have a fruity argument.


:cry: :cry: :cry:
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby suggs on Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:11 am

Get it together Mr. Cola-you can get through this. Perhaps you need another non-Hasbro affiliated meeting?
Have to respect your sig though... :)
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class suggs
 
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Postby heavycola on Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:15 am

suggs wrote:Get it together Mr. Cola-you can get through this. Perhaps you need another non-Hasbro affiliated meeting?
Have to respect your sig though... :)


Actually I have been in development talks over a new website: http://www.coinflipclub.com. Basically members click a button to flip an electronic 'coin' against each other. We are going to have coins from all different countries and stuff, and a forum where people can cry about how rigged it all is.
I think it's going to be a winner. I know i'll be clicking that coin button like a lab rat with a crack-dispensing lever.

I also realise you have hijacked this thread, and possibly flown it into a building at the behest of dick cheney. It was probably for the best.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Re: The definitive 'why 9/11 conspiracies are rubbish' threa

Postby Snorri1234 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:31 am

heavycola wrote:Partly because I miss Xtra's insanity, and also because I like arguing, and being right, I would like to answer any and all conspiracy theories regarding 9/11. One by one. They have been makign a stealthy reappearance in teh forum recently.
If anyone would like to start with a question or statement, please do. Otherwise I win by default.


JFK conspiracy theorists were unable to comprehend that a lone gunman's actions could have had such enormous repercussions, and therefore there MUST have been darker forces at work. Nevertheless, computer modelling of Dealey Plaza in the last few years has shown that it was indeed LHO who was solely responsible for the president's death. Individuals CAN, occasionally, be the snowflake that starts a massive avalanche.
Same here. Xtra used to describe the hijackers as 'kids with boxcutters' because he could not attribute the enormity of what happened that day and afterwards to a bunch of towelheads. However, that is what happened.


Yeah, you'd much rather believe a bunch of kids with boxcutters got to the best security in the world than face the truth.












sheep.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby Serbia on Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:45 am

Well, I still think it's likely there was a larger conspiracy with the JFK murder, but not being born until '81, doesn't really affect me much. And besides, that scale (at least in the mind of a kid) doesn't match that of the 9/11 hysteria, which has much bigger consequences if you choose to believe your own government did it, or "kids with box cutters".

So I guess we can argue... oh and for good measure, I prefer my Cola light, and my liquor straight. So there.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby luns101 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:11 pm

Ok here goes...

Frigidus produced pictures that Hulk Hogan was the real culprit and mastermind behind the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks. I, for one, was convinced since he actually produced genuine photographic evidence.

What really happened on 9/11 thread

Now, I dare you sir....no, I defy you to produce evidence to the contrary.
User avatar
Major luns101
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:51 pm
Location: Oceanic Flight 815

Postby heavycola on Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:44 pm

luns101 wrote:Ok here goes...

Frigidus produced pictures that Hulk Hogan was the real culprit and mastermind behind the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks. I, for one, was convinced since he actually produced genuine photographic evidence.

What really happened on 9/11 thread

Now, I dare you sir....no, I defy you to produce evidence to the contrary.


The National Wrestling Organisation... of course, it all make sense.
I bet Eddie Guerrero faked his own death too. Well, i'm sold. Ron Paul gets my vote.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby Snorri1234 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:55 pm

heavycola wrote:The National Wrestling Organisation... of course, it all make sense.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby browng-08 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:55 pm

Ha ha HAA!!! That was the last vote we needed! Now the reptilians are free to use Ron Paul to bake evil doomday cake of terror!
User avatar
Corporal browng-08
 
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:46 pm

Postby Bavarian Raven on Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:31 pm

funny thing is, i never doubted what happened on 911, just why it happened... :roll:
Sergeant 1st Class Bavarian Raven
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:52 pm
Location: Canada, Vancouver

Postby Jenos Ridan on Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:38 am

All the US Presidents who have been assassinated have been taken out by lone gunmen, why is JFK any different?

Answer: an unhealthy attachment to the aforementioned deceised former Leader of the Free World.

People simply need to get over it: He obviously wasn't all that popular and one person clearly hated him so much that he wanted to kill him.
"There is only one road to peace, and that is to conquer"-Hunter Clark

"Give a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life"- Something Hunter would say
User avatar
Private Jenos Ridan
 
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Hanger 18

Re: The definitive 'why 9/11 conspiracies are rubbish' threa

Postby Norse on Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:41 am

What was the "liquid magma" type fluid, seen clearly dripping from one of the towers, in the time between "the plane crash" and the "teh pancakz0r"

Why did the towers pancake at nearly the acceleration that the gravitational pull would have produced? Other than a fragmented, "clash-clash-clash" as the tower collapsed perfectly into a heap?

Why did trade centre 7 collapse?

How was the pentagon, considering the nature of the damage, and the lack of wreckage, damaged?

Which high-ranking political bilderberger member is paying you/sucking you off?

Who the f*ck is alice?
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Re: The definitive 'why 9/11 conspiracies are rubbish' threa

Postby vtmarik on Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:53 pm

Norse wrote:What was the "liquid magma" type fluid, seen clearly dripping from one of the towers, in the time between "the plane crash" and the "teh pancakz0r"


Melted Sherbet, brought for a party.

Why did the towers pancake at nearly the acceleration that the gravitational pull would have produced? Other than a fragmented, "clash-clash-clash" as the tower collapsed perfectly into a heap?


Ever watch a martial artist break a stack of bricks? ( Like this ) Ever notice how they all appear to break at about the same time (even though they don't, they break in series)? Kinda like that.

Why did trade centre 7 collapse?


Because Jesus wanted it to.

How was the pentagon, considering the nature of the damage, and the lack of wreckage, damaged?


By sheer force of will.

Which high-ranking political bilderberger member is paying you/sucking you off?


That would be Whitey.

Who the f*ck is alice?


She's the star of a serious Lifetime movie made into a sitcom.



One of these answers is not like the other one.
Last edited by vtmarik on Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
Cadet vtmarik
 
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.

Postby got tonkaed on Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:55 pm

the answer to the which one isnt like the others is that jesus wanted trade center 7 thing to collapse becuase that one is obvious truth where as the others are all clearly cases of infantile speculation.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby static_ice on Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:59 pm

If Cola doesn't mind I'd like to ask some on topic questions... I was debating in another forum and I got a few snags.

1. In response to the basic logic that if the government was capable of getting a hold of the two planes for the WTC, they should have been able to get a hold of one for the Pentagon (instead of placing a bomb), my opponents claimed that it was a missile instead that was directed to the Pentagon. That's how they explain the smaller explosion and small hole (which they're too lazy to verify).

2. Actually that's all I remember off the top of my head. :)
R.I.P. Chef
User avatar
Sergeant static_ice
 
Posts: 9174
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:51 am

Postby Snorri1234 on Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:12 pm

static_ice wrote:1. In response to the basic logic that if the government was capable of getting a hold of the two planes for the WTC, they should have been able to get a hold of one for the Pentagon (instead of placing a bomb), my opponents claimed that it was a missile instead that was directed to the Pentagon. That's how they explain the smaller explosion and small hole (which they're too lazy to verify).


What I'm so curious about is that noone explains what happened to the plane that supposedly hit the pentagon. I mean, sure conspiracies are awesome, but why did they make a plane dissappear and then hit the pentagon with a missile?
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby unriggable on Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:13 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
static_ice wrote:1. In response to the basic logic that if the government was capable of getting a hold of the two planes for the WTC, they should have been able to get a hold of one for the Pentagon (instead of placing a bomb), my opponents claimed that it was a missile instead that was directed to the Pentagon. That's how they explain the smaller explosion and small hole (which they're too lazy to verify).


What I'm so curious about is that noone explains what happened to the plane that supposedly hit the pentagon. I mean, sure conspiracies are awesome, but why did they make a plane dissappear and then hit the pentagon with a missile?


BeCaUsE ItS A CoNsPiRaCy oOoOoO.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby static_ice on Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:18 pm

I remembered that other question... something like if the whole plane crashed, why weren't there any holes or dents made from the wings and engines, in addition to the small circular hole (In the wall of the Pentagon)? This one's from an apparent expert on planes, who says that the engines and wings of a Boeing wouldn't "just break off or just explode".

P.S. I love this thread. :)
R.I.P. Chef
User avatar
Sergeant static_ice
 
Posts: 9174
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:51 am

Postby muy_thaiguy on Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:32 pm

That^^^^is hilarious. :lol:
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby unriggable on Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:35 pm

static_ice wrote:I remembered that other question... something like if the whole plane crashed, why weren't there any holes or dents made from the wings and engines, in addition to the small circular hole (In the wall of the Pentagon)? This one's from an apparent expert on planes, who says that the engines and wings of a Boeing wouldn't "just break off or just explode".

P.S. I love this thread. :)


Reminds me of when Bugs Bunny runs through an ice sheet, his sillhouette is preserved perfectly.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby OnlyAmbrose on Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:37 pm

This thread's gonna be really boring until the conspiracy theorists show up...
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class OnlyAmbrose
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:53 pm

Postby unriggable on Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:47 pm

OnlyAmbrose wrote:This thread's gonna be really boring until the conspiracy theorists show up...


No promises.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby static_ice on Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:42 pm

unriggable wrote:
static_ice wrote:I remembered that other question... something like if the whole plane crashed, why weren't there any holes or dents made from the wings and engines, in addition to the small circular hole (In the wall of the Pentagon)? This one's from an apparent expert on planes, who says that the engines and wings of a Boeing wouldn't "just break off or just explode".

P.S. I love this thread. :)


Reminds me of when Bugs Bunny runs through an ice sheet, his sillhouette is preserved perfectly.


Good one. :lol:
R.I.P. Chef
User avatar
Sergeant static_ice
 
Posts: 9174
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:51 am

Next

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jonesthecurl