Moderator: Community Team
mrkaris wrote:this issue came up yesterday, just wanted to get others opinions.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Itrade wrote:I consider it a legitimate strategy, especially if the information that you're supplying is false. You can use the fog to further your own cause while casting doubt on anything other information being supplied when people find out that you were lying. It adds another layer of strategy to the fog.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
hammocksleeper wrote:i absolutely find it a legitimate aspect of strategic play. might i also mention that it is just as easy to lie about board information as it is to reveal the truth.
hammocksleeper wrote:i absolutely find it a legitimate aspect of strategic play. might i also mention that it is just as easy to lie about board information as it is to reveal the truth.
iamkoolerthanu wrote:hammocksleeper wrote:i absolutely find it a legitimate aspect of strategic play. might i also mention that it is just as easy to lie about board information as it is to reveal the truth.
hammocksleeper wrote:i absolutely find it a legitimate aspect of strategic play. might i also mention that it is just as easy to lie about board information as it is to reveal the truth.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users