How would you describe your political alleigance?
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:14 amDoes it get any better than this?
I put myself down as.......dunno.
I put myself down as.......dunno.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
How would you describe your political alleigance?
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39803
Page 1 of 5
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:14 amPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:19 amNeo-Nationalist federalist classical libertarian identitary, or "National-Liberal".
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:22 amI didn't see "pinko, liberal, metrosexual anarchist", so I didn't vote.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:23 amU should have put "Other (please explain in a post)" as a choice.
I'm Neoclassical Conservative.
I'm Neoclassical Conservative.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:24 amOnly allowed 12 options Im afraid...there could have quite easily been 20-25 valid options.
I would describe myself as a Nationalist, but didn't think it had enough substance for the poll.
I would describe myself as a Nationalist, but didn't think it had enough substance for the poll.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:26 amNorse wrote:Only allowed 12 options Im afraid...there could have quite easily been 20-25 valid options.
I would describe myself as a Nationalist, but didn't think it had enough substance for the poll.
Nationalist is too vague. Especially because way too many consider themselves nationalists.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:28 amSnorri1234 wrote:Norse wrote:Only allowed 12 options Im afraid...there could have quite easily been 20-25 valid options.
I would describe myself as a Nationalist, but didn't think it had enough substance for the poll.
Nationalist is too vague. Especially because way too many consider themselves nationalists.
exactly! hence my reason.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:47 amgo hecterism!
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:59 amWhat about "leaning towards democrat, but will vote for whomever seems best (or least worst) in an election"
I know, it seems wishy-washy, but it really isn't, I'm against following a party blindly, it just involves too much trust in people
For '08, I'm leaning toward Obama. If he doesn't make it to the election, then hopefully McCain does....otherwise, I don't know what I will do.
I know, it seems wishy-washy, but it really isn't, I'm against following a party blindly, it just involves too much trust in people
For '08, I'm leaning toward Obama. If he doesn't make it to the election, then hopefully McCain does....otherwise, I don't know what I will do.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:02 amI suppose Norse means what ideology do you subscribe to, not what candidate traits do you look for, so if you're a social democrat, but vote for McCain because you like him, your ideology is still social-democratic (and by extension totalitarian, but that's a different matter).
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:09 amNapoleon Ier wrote:I suppose Norse means ......
Christ, isn't it pretty self-explainatory.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:11 amNorse wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:I suppose Norse means ......
Christ, isn't it pretty self-explainatory.
Give the poor girl a chance
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:59 pmClassical Conservative. I have found that many of my ideals come from that of 50s America, and that I have alot of similar views with people such as Teddy Roosevelt, Thomas Jefferson, etc...
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:01 pmParadiceCity9 wrote:go hecterism!
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:02 pmNapoleon Ier wrote:Norse wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:I suppose Norse means ......
Christ, isn't it pretty self-explainatory.
Give the poor girl a chance
Nappy rash, every time you try and patronise someone, a fairy dies. Do you understand?
I don't have any allegiance. Mostly I assume whatever winds up the fuckheads i am talking to most. I hate sitting around and agreeing with people, and in the bourgeois enclaves of hackney that happens all too often. Too much received wisdom. Why, the other day I was arguing that thatcher had done great things for the UK. No one really understood why they disagreed. It was just ' but we hate her'. No idea why. I hate her too.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:04 pmI am whatever Norse says I am.
Although also possibly a Liberal Patriot.
Although also possibly a Liberal Patriot.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:11 pmi am none of them, because they are all a bunch of lying bastards who don't do shit for anyone. there only in it for the money, oh they may start off with good intentons,but with more power that changes them into greedy f**kers.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:14 pmMonarchist then?DAZMCFC wrote:i am none of them, because they are all a bunch of lying bastards who don't do shit for anyone. there only in it for the money, oh they may start off with good intentons,but with more power that changes them into greedy f**kers.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:18 pmis it sad hecter is winning
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:42 pmheavycola wrote:
I don't have any allegiance. Mostly I assume whatever winds up the fuckheads i am talking to most. I hate sitting around and agreeing with people, and in the bourgeois enclaves of hackney that happens all too often. Too much received wisdom. Why, the other day I was arguing that thatcher had done great things for the UK. No one really understood why they disagreed. It was just ' but we hate her'. No idea why. I hate her too.
I find myself doing this, but I don't think I could argue the point for someone who I hated though, even if it is giving some liberal member of the islington brigade a stonking great hard-on.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:54 pmsuggs wrote:I am whatever Norse says I am.
Although also possibly a Liberal Patriot.
hmmm..I would say "Yoga enthusiast, empathetic stalker, Unhelpful chemical tester"
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:00 pm*hastily hides Amal Nitrate bottle* right ho Meths next then sir?
But why is there an option for National Socialist (ie NAZI) but no pure National?
But why is there an option for National Socialist (ie NAZI) but no pure National?
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:03 pmsuggs wrote:*hastily hides Amal Nitrate bottle* right ho Meths next then sir?
But why is there an option for National Socialist (ie NAZI) but no pure National?
It could be argued that the term "national" is quite a wide-reaching term. I would consider that a few of the ideaologies listed contain levels of nationalism, by the nature of them.
However, "National liberal" was a terrible ommision on my part.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:08 pmheavycola wrote:
Nappy rash, every time you try and patronise someone, a fairy dies. Do you understand?
haha! majestic!
and i agree with the rest of the posts sentiment too .. although that may fall into the idiom you so despise... what a flamin irony!
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:13 pmyou are not a liberalNapoleon Ier wrote:Neo-Nationalist federalist classical libertarian identitary, or "National-Liberal".