How would you describe your political alleigance?

by **Norse** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:14 am

Does it get any better than this?

I put myself down as.......dunno.

by **Napoleon Ier** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:19 am

Neo-Nationalist federalist classical libertarian identitary, or "National-Liberal".

by **Snorri1234** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:22 am

I didn't see "pinko, liberal, metrosexual anarchist", so I didn't vote.

by **TheTeacher** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:23 am

U should have put "Other (please explain in a post)" as a choice.

I'm Neoclassical Conservative.

by **Norse** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:24 am

Only allowed 12 options Im afraid...there could have quite easily been 20-25 valid options.

I would describe myself as a Nationalist, but didn't think it had enough substance for the poll.

by **Snorri1234** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:26 am

Norse wrote:Only allowed 12 options Im afraid...there could have quite easily been 20-25 valid options.

I would describe myself as a Nationalist, but didn't think it had enough substance for the poll.

Nationalist is too vague. Especially because way too many consider themselves nationalists.

by **Norse** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:28 am

Snorri1234 wrote:
Norse wrote:Only allowed 12 options Im afraid...there could have quite easily been 20-25 valid options.

I would describe myself as a Nationalist, but didn't think it had enough substance for the poll.

Nationalist is too vague. Especially because way too many consider themselves nationalists.

exactly! hence my reason.

by **ParadiceCity9** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:47 am

go hecterism!

by **jennifermarie** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:59 am

What about "leaning towards democrat, but will vote for whomever seems best (or least worst) in an election"

I know, it seems wishy-washy, but it really isn't, I'm against following a party blindly, it just involves too much trust in people

For '08, I'm leaning toward Obama. If he doesn't make it to the election, then hopefully McCain does....otherwise, I don't know what I will do.

by **Napoleon Ier** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:02 am

I suppose Norse means what ideology do you subscribe to, not what candidate traits do you look for, so if you're a social democrat, but vote for McCain because you like him, your ideology is still social-democratic (and by extension totalitarian, but that's a different matter).

by **Norse** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:09 am

Napoleon Ier wrote:I suppose Norse means ......

Christ, isn't it pretty self-explainatory.

by **Napoleon Ier** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:11 am

Norse wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:I suppose Norse means ......

Christ, isn't it pretty self-explainatory.

Give the poor girl a chance

by **muy_thaiguy** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:59 pm

Classical Conservative. I have found that many of my ideals come from that of 50s America, and that I have alot of similar views with people such as Teddy Roosevelt, Thomas Jefferson, etc...

by **0ojakeo0** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:01 pm

ParadiceCity9 wrote:go hecterism!

by **heavycola** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:02 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:
Norse wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:I suppose Norse means ......

Christ, isn't it pretty self-explainatory.

Give the poor girl a chance

Nappy rash, every time you try and patronise someone, a fairy dies. Do you understand?

I don't have any allegiance. Mostly I assume whatever winds up the fuckheads i am talking to most. I hate sitting around and agreeing with people, and in the bourgeois enclaves of hackney that happens all too often. Too much received wisdom. Why, the other day I was arguing that thatcher had done great things for the UK. No one really understood why they disagreed. It was just ' but we hate her'. No idea why. I hate her too.

by **suggs** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:04 pm

I am whatever Norse says I am.
Although also possibly a Liberal Patriot.

by **DAZMCFC** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:11 pm

i am none of them, because they are all a bunch of lying bastards who don't do shit for anyone. there only in it for the money, oh they may start off with good intentons,but with more power that changes them into greedy f**kers.

by **muy_thaiguy** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:14 pm

DAZMCFC wrote:i am none of them, because they are all a bunch of lying bastards who don't do shit for anyone. there only in it for the money, oh they may start off with good intentons,but with more power that changes them into greedy f**kers.

Monarchist then?

by **Tyr** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:18 pm

is it sad hecter is winning

by **Norse** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:42 pm

heavycola wrote:

I don't have any allegiance. Mostly I assume whatever winds up the fuckheads i am talking to most. I hate sitting around and agreeing with people, and in the bourgeois enclaves of hackney that happens all too often. Too much received wisdom. Why, the other day I was arguing that thatcher had done great things for the UK. No one really understood why they disagreed. It was just ' but we hate her'. No idea why. I hate her too.

I find myself doing this, but I don't think I could argue the point for someone who I hated though, even if it is giving some liberal member of the islington brigade a stonking great hard-on.

by **Norse** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:54 pm

suggs wrote:I am whatever Norse says I am.
Although also possibly a Liberal Patriot.

hmmm..I would say "Yoga enthusiast, empathetic stalker, Unhelpful chemical tester"

by **suggs** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:00 pm

*hastily hides Amal Nitrate bottle* right ho Meths next then sir?
But why is there an option for National Socialist (ie NAZI) but no pure National?

by **Norse** on Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:03 pm

suggs wrote:*hastily hides Amal Nitrate bottle* right ho Meths next then sir?
But why is there an option for National Socialist (ie NAZI) but no pure National?

It could be argued that the term "national" is quite a wide-reaching term. I would consider that a few of the ideaologies listed contain levels of nationalism, by the nature of them.

However, "National liberal" was a terrible ommision on my part.