Swear-Bear says Ron Paul is BAD!

[Minister Masket]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r-kgZxx5AM&feature=user

If you have the time, check out some other Blunty3000 videos.
They are verily amusing.

[DaGip]

Say Hi to your slutty mummy for me, she gives great head!

[hecter]

BITCH! I love you...

[DaGip]

If you noticed, it was an Australian video, not an American one...though it had an American flag. But he admits that he isn't even a citizen of America...so who is going to listen to a stinky puppet gopher? All Americans love Ron Paul!

[unriggable]

All Americans love Ron Paul!

All of them, except the ones that don't vote for him...at least 90% of this country.

[Snorri1234]

All Americans love Ron Paul!

All of them, except the ones that don't vote for him...at least 90% of this country.

Well.....they're not true americans!

[Norse]

"SPAM! mother-fucking, scrotum-punching, Brother in law raping spam"


Fucking hilarious.

[DaGip]

All Americans love Ron Paul!

All of them, except the ones that don't vote for him...at least 90% of this country.

Well.....they're not true americans!

That is exactly what I was thinking! How do you do it?

[Snorri1234]

All Americans love Ron Paul!

All of them, except the ones that don't vote for him...at least 90% of this country.

Well.....they're not true americans!

That is exactly what I was thinking! How do you do it?

I'm pretty apt at identifying the logic behind Ron Pauls opponents.
See, what RP's supporters are lacking is the consequences of what he's advocating. Sure he's pro-constitution, but that's not all he's for.
For this, let me quote a friend.

The policy implications of appealing to constitutional fidelity aren't what make Ron unelectable -- that stuff's fine. He gets mad props because he was among the first republicans to realize that his own party had done a polar shift on the preservation of individual rights and the protection of dignity from governmental powers, and he wants to reverse what has been done in the last seven years. The real issue with his popular support -- or lack of thereof -- is that he wants to strip governmental power below what even the Constitution guarantees it will provide to the people (provide for the common welfare, etc) because he's really into a non-coercion principle style of governance that necessarily involves the morally mandated removal of a lot of things that only a very very narrow ideological subset of Americans could ever comfortably support. We're not going to have the federal government abandon public schools, we're not going to move to gold-backed currency, we will not get rid of eminent domain, we will not abolish the federal reserve and move to a regressive consumption tax, we will not repeal the War Powers Resolution, we will not bail out of NAFTA and the WTO and become a noninterventionalist, isolationist nation.