Page 1 of 1

Murder Mystery

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 9:27 am
by Daring Overlord5
If you like a good murder mystery, you're going to love this one. Do
You like to read a good murder mystery? Not even Law and Order would
Attempt to capture this. At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for
Forensic Science, AAFS President Dr. Don Harper Mills astounded his
Audience with the legal complications of a bizarre death.


Here is the story:


On March 23, 1994 ... The medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald
Opus, and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head.
Mr.Opus had jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to
Commit suicide. He left a note to the effect indicating his
Despondency. As he fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted
By a shotgun blast passing through a window,
Which killed him instantly.


Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had
Been installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some
Building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to
Complete his suicide the way he had planned.
"Ordinarily," Dr Mills continued, "Someone who sets out to commit
Suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not
Be what he intended, is still defined as committing suicide." That Mr.
Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would not have
Been successful because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner
To feel that he had a homicide on his hands.


The room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was
Occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously,
And he was threatening her with a shotgun! The man was so upset that
When he pulled the trigger, he completely missed his wife, and the
Pellets went through the window, striking Mr. Opus. When one intends
To kill subject "A" but kills subject "B" in the attempt, one is
Guilty of the murder of subject "B."


When confronted with the murder charge, the old man and his wife were
Both adamant, and both said that they thought the shotgun was not
Loaded. The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his
Wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had
No intention to murder her. Therefore the killing of Mr. Opus appeared
To be an accident; that is, assuming the gun had been accidentally
Loaded.


The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old
couple's son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal
Accident.


It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial
Support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the
Shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his
Father would shoot his mother. Since the loader of the gun was aware
Of this, he was guilty of the murder even though he didn't actually
Pull the trigger. The case now becomes one of murder on the part of
The son for the death of Ronald Opus.


Now comes the exquisite twist... Further investigation revealed that
The son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He had become increasingly
Despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's
Murder. This led him to jump off the ten-story building on March 23rd,
Only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story
Window. The son, Ronald Opus, had actually murdered himself. So the
Medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.


A true story from Associated Press.

is that weird or what

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 9:38 am
by militant
The most wierd bit is that the man would threaten his wife with an unloaded shotgun :?

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:36 am
by apey
U have got to b kidding me there is no way that is a true story

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:55 pm
by Gypsys Kiss
As you might imagine, Dr. Mills has been queried thoroughly and frequently regarding the Opus case since the story broke on the Internet in 1994. In 1997 he came clean to the press about it:

"I made up the story in 1987 to present at the meeting," he told the London Daily Telegraph on March 2, "for entertainment and to illustrate how if you alter a few small facts you greatly alter the legal consequences." [Italics added]

Anticlimactic, isn't it? Unfortunately, that's as much reality as there is to be found behind the Opus story. Seven years after it was made up, the text of Mills' speech, sans disclaimer and with the date revised, found its way onto the greatest rumor mill ever invented and continues to circulate there to this day. How many thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of people have read it and believed it, we have no way of knowing. At least you and I have the advantage of knowing it's not true... for whatever that's worth.

Case closed on another urban legend?

Probably not.

David Emery(about.com)



easy to find whole article just google Ronald Opus

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:19 pm
by -ShadySoul-
You are wrong daring, i have seen an episode in a TV show about this incident. And it is actually a true story.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:33 pm
by InkL0sed
This was in Magnolia, at the beginning.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:35 pm
by riggable
It was on the movie magnolia, so its pretty old news actually.


They do a great job of recreating it in the movie, by the way.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:37 pm
by InkL0sed
riggable wrote:It was on the movie magnolia, so its pretty old news actually.


They do a great job of recreating it in the movie, by the way.


Fastposted! :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:37 pm
by unriggable
riggable wrote:It was on the movie magnolia, so its pretty old news actually.


They do a great job of recreating it in the movie, by the way.


Fastposted.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:37 pm
by unriggable
InkL0sed wrote:
riggable wrote:It was on the movie magnolia, so its pretty old news actually.


They do a great job of recreating it in the movie, by the way.


Fastposted! :lol:


Oh f*ck the irony.