Page 1 of 2

A new political test

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:00 pm
by Norse
Slightly different to the pllitical compass...also aimed really at yankish politics....good nonetheless

http://www.politicalbrew.com/politest.cgi

I must've answered the bleeding thing incorrectly, as it rates me as a centrist-liberal....well mildly rightist, and mildly liberal....maybe I'm talking to you pansies too often, but I think it is more due to the way that the questions are worded.

0-100: non-fiscal = 35, Fiscal = 55

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:09 pm
by unriggable
On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (12).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (4).

Re: A new political test

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:10 pm
by unriggable
Norse wrote:I must've answered the bleeding thing incorrectly, as it rates me as a centrist-liberal....well mildly rightist, and mildly liberal....maybe I'm talking to you pansies too often, but I think it is more due to the way that the questions are worded.


Either that or you're too much in denial.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:12 pm
by unriggable
This website needs to be updated for today's presidential candidates.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:13 pm
by hecter
On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (8).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (12).

I'm only slightly less liberal than unriggable...

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:13 pm
by got tonkaed
On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (9).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (15).

so there you go...now that you can see what correct thinking is, you guys can begin to see where you err from there... :shock:

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:14 pm
by got tonkaed
i dont know, i didnt like some of the phrasing and questioning on the issue, especially if i dont get some kind of barometer as to what is the distinction between low medium and high levels of importance.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:14 pm
by Norse
Seriously though, I think you would literally have to be a card-carrying nazi to get higher than 60 on this test, in either categories.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:15 pm
by got tonkaed
Norse wrote:Seriously though, I think you would literally have to be a card-carrying nazi to get higher than 60 on this test, in either categories.


i bet you the right to the other persons sig for one month, that at least 1 person get over 60 in non fiscal issues.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:18 pm
by unriggable
got tonkaed wrote:
Norse wrote:Seriously though, I think you would literally have to be a card-carrying nazi to get higher than 60 on this test, in either categories.


i bet you the right to the other persons sig for one month, that at least 1 person get over 60 in non fiscal issues.


Where's beezer when you need him...

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:18 pm
by Norse
got tonkaed wrote:
Norse wrote:Seriously though, I think you would literally have to be a card-carrying nazi to get higher than 60 on this test, in either categories.


i bet you the right to the other persons sig for one month, that at least 1 person get over 60 in non fiscal issues.


Hmmm...gun rights, gay marraige and druggies....methinks that this is a bum-deal considering certain religous persuasions...but hey, it's crimbo....deal!

On one basis though, that they are a a regular poster, and someone we actually know....eliminating foul-play issues ;)

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:20 pm
by got tonkaed
fair play, im counting on jay, mtg, or even a guy like thornhart to get it.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:22 pm
by jiminski
Hello there Norsey,

Well there i am as follows:

On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Strong Liberal (10).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Moderate Liberal (27).

practically a fascist!

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:24 pm
by suggs
surprise, surprise-LIBERAL! (non fiscal 9, fiscal, 12)
ah, norse how come the two greatest minds on CC are worlds apart...
still, i have to admire your taste in arses...oh, j-lo hmmmmmmmmmm...

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:24 pm
by Clive
On Non-Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Centrist (45).
On Fiscal Issues, you rank as a Moderate Liberal (36).

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:25 pm
by Napoleon Ier
Non Fiscal : 68 :? dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 8) better

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:27 pm
by got tonkaed
Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 :? dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 8) better


FOR THE WIN!

i should have known it was you, youd never let me down napoleon....

give me some time norse, ill come up with something.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:27 pm
by hecter
Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 :? dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 8) better

Ladies and gentlemen, we have our card carrying Nazi.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:31 pm
by Napoleon Ier
hecter wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 :? dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 8) better

Ladies and gentlemen, we have our card carrying Nazi.


Thank you, thank you....I owe you all, I'd like to thank to my wife, for her loving support, my parents, my manager, and all of you, because you made this happen, this, momentous occasion for me, so, applaud yourselves...I am lost in a sea of emotion, I must thank my friends also, DancingRetard, Jizz-card...this is truly...

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:36 pm
by F1fth
Interesting.

Non-Fiscal = Moderate Liberal (39)
Fiscal = Centrist (56).

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:37 pm
by satanspaladin
well no surprise for me strong liberal non fiscal 6 fiscal 10

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:40 pm
by Norse
Here's another one...based on Australia's political parties.

Notice the distinct way in which they set their questions out...slightly more to my taste.

Greens 38.5%
Australian Democrats 54.5%
Labor Party 61.4%
Family First 57.2%
Liberal Party 59.9%
National Party 54.6%
One Nation 80.4%

Now...my only question to aussies...is what "one nation" stands for?

http://www.ozpolitics.info/guide/fun/politics-test/

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:43 pm
by Norse
Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 :? dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 8) better


See, despite your economical right, you still have a little bit of a heart. :lol:

Damn, the only mildly liberal thing I had said, was that gun laws should be tightened, though not outlawed, and gays can have civil service ceremonies, though not being labelled with "marraige".....

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:51 pm
by Napoleon Ier
Norse wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Non Fiscal : 68 :? dissapointing

Fiscal : 95 8) better


See, despite your economical right, you still have a little bit of a heart. :lol:

Damn, the only mildly liberal thing I had said, was that gun laws should be tightened, though not outlawed, and gays can have civil service ceremonies, though not being labelled with "marraige".....


Shame, shame. Still, we all know that you ain't no goddam pinko-lefty, and tha ain't no paper you need to prove that, no suh!

Still, if you and I are only scoring 68 and 35, imagine Jizz-card and the teachintern trade union, they have got to be in the minus region

PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:52 pm
by Neutrino
Norse wrote:Here's another one...based on Australia's political parties.

Notice the distinct way in which they set their questions out...slightly more to my taste.

Greens 38.5%
Australian Democrats 54.5%
Labor Party 61.4%
Family First 57.2%
Liberal Party 59.9%
National Party 54.6%
One Nation 80.4%

Now...my only question to aussies...is what "one nation" stands for?


You got them as your highest percentage, so guess...

[size=0]Crazy nationalists[/size]

P.S. There's no link to the AUS one...


EDIT: Ahhh, now there is.