Why Ron Paul?
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:26 pmEverywhere i go on CC I see things for Ron Paul. I honestly don't think America is going to reelect a republican again.
Post your Ideas.
Post your Ideas.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
Why Ron Paul?
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=37411
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:26 pmPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:27 pmStudy up a little.....Ron Paul technically isnt a standard republican....he's more libertarian.
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:30 pmHam wrote:Study up a little.....Ron Paul technically isnt a standard republican....he's more libertarian.
Since he is more libertarian is he going to make marijuana legal?
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:31 pma-person1192 wrote:Ham wrote:Study up a little.....Ron Paul technically isnt a standard republican....he's more libertarian.
Since he is more libertarian is he going to make marijuana legal?
God i hope so!
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:33 pmPaul favors the use of marijuana as a medical option. He was cosponsor of H.R. 2592, the States' Rights to Medical Marijuana Act.[188][189] He opposes federal prohibition of this option in states such as California under Proposition 215.
Paul has joined prominent liberal Democrats in urging that states be allowed to permit farmers to grow industrial hemp.[177] He contends that this would help North Dakota and other agriculture states, where farmers have requested the ability to farm hemp for years.[177]
In 2005 he introduced H.R. 3037, the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2005, “to amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marijuana, and for other purposes”.[190] This bill would have given the states the power to regulate farming of hemp. The measure would be a first since the national prohibition of industrial hemp farming in the United States.
On February 13, 2007 Paul introduced H.R. 1009, the "Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2007", with nine original cosponsors.[191] The Economist wrote that his support for hemp farming could appeal to farmers in Iowa.[191]
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:36 pmPaul favors the use of marijuana as a medical option.
Lets Go Ron Paul!!!!!!!
Re: Why Ron Paul?
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:44 pmThere are 3-4 actual supporters on this site. They just happen to also be spammers.a-person1192 wrote:Everywhere i go on CC I see things for Ron Paul. I honestly don't think America is going to reelect a republican again.
Post your Ideas.
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:45 pmim not a spammer and i support ron paul
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:46 pmTyr wrote:im not a spammer and i support ron paul
True, but soundout, jay, and dagip are. You were that 4th one.
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:47 pmmaybe they just reallylike ronpaul and dont spam when it comes to him
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:08 amTyr wrote:maybe they just reallylike ronpaul and dont spam when it comes to him
Oh no, it's been proven by a random Youtube video I considered watching once; Ron Paul causes spam. Also: cancer. Merely by supporting him you are simultaneously increacing your propensity for spam and decreasing the length of your life.
Don't vote Ron Paul: Ron Paul Kills!
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:36 pma-person1192 wrote:Ham wrote:Study up a little.....Ron Paul technically isnt a standard republican....he's more libertarian.
Since he is more libertarian is he going to make marijuana legal?
Ron Paul is against the War on Drugs...so there is a very good chance.
Ron Paul is proConstitution, free trade, non interventionist, pro Life...
Some things, Like not belonging to NATO anymore, I question.
But, I am a registered Republican and Ron Paul is the only one I like...so I am voting Ron Paul.
If RonPaul does not make the Republican Nomination, I am dropping the party and voting for Obama.
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:56 pmThere are plenty of non-spammer Ron Paul supporters on this site. Tyr, myself, and Coleman are three such individuals.
I think Ron Paul is the only chance the Republicans have in this election. Let's face it - anyone who is in total support of continuing the Iraq war doesn't have a chance.
And even if Ron Paul just got the nomination but didn't win the general election, it would set quite the precedent for Republicans to come. It would force many politicians to be less aggressive in their foreign policies and lose the social conservatism (such as the patriot act...).
I think Ron Paul is the only chance the Republicans have in this election. Let's face it - anyone who is in total support of continuing the Iraq war doesn't have a chance.
And even if Ron Paul just got the nomination but didn't win the general election, it would set quite the precedent for Republicans to come. It would force many politicians to be less aggressive in their foreign policies and lose the social conservatism (such as the patriot act...).
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:50 pmOnlyAmbrose wrote:There are plenty of non-spammer Ron Paul supporters on this site. Tyr, myself, and Coleman are three such individuals.
I think Ron Paul is the only chance the Republicans have in this election. Let's face it - anyone who is in total support of continuing the Iraq war doesn't have a chance.
And even if Ron Paul just got the nomination but didn't win the general election, it would set quite the precedent for Republicans to come. It would force many politicians to be less aggressive in their foreign policies and lose the social conservatism (such as the patriot act...).
At least Ron Paul is bringing some important issues that are usually avoided to the table. He is sending a strong message to our government with all his supporters. Six million bucks in one day! That ain't nothing to laugh at...Oh, speaking of laughing...watch this video if you thinking of voting for Hillary:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... &plindex=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwbYpHvrBUk