Who would the world elect?

by **jay_a2j** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:46 am

Find out at http://www.whowouldtheworldelect.com.

by **MeDeFe** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:48 am

There's only one real candidate.

by **jay_a2j** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:52 am

MeDeFe wrote:There's only one real candidate.

Yeah I know and the world seems to agree..... Ron Paul.

by **ignotus** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:53 am

jay_a2j wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:There's only one real candidate.

Yeah I know and the world seems to agree..... Ron Paul.

So that's the way u Americans vote... :wink:

by **xtreme2252** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:57 am

Elect the Dead!

[/img]

by **MeDeFe** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:54 am

jay_a2j wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:There's only one real candidate.

Yeah I know and the world seems to agree..... Ron Paul.

You're not very good at taking contexts into account, are you?

by **got tonkaed** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:52 am

jay_a2j wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:There's only one real candidate.

Yeah I know and the world seems to agree..... Ron Paul.

some how i get the feeling there might not be that many people in the world who know ron paul....

by **Guiscard** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:51 am

jay_a2j wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:There's only one real candidate.

Yeah I know and the world seems to agree..... Ron Paul.

Yeh, in internetz landz... (Of course I mean other than Luns)

In real life, however, isn't Ron Paul getting like 2% in the polls? Surely there is no conceivable way he could get the nomination...

by **mr. incrediball** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:00 am

i know nothing about US politics except that jay likes ron paul and hates hillary clinton.

so i went for jay's choice and voted...hillary :twisted:

by **Dancing Mustard** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:16 am

Guiscard wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:There's only one real candidate.

Yeah I know and the world seems to agree..... Ron Paul.

Yeh, in internetz landz... (Of course I mean other than Luns)

In real life, however, isn't Ron Paul getting like 2% in the polls? Surely there is no conceivable way he could get the nomination...

Seriously though, retarded internet polls aside, who are tipped as the most likely candidates to win the election, as rated by the more respectable American opinion polling services?

I'm hoping you'll say Chris Dodd... but I'm interested to know who's actually likely to be the winner.

by **Guiscard** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:03 pm

Dancing Mustard wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:There's only one real candidate.

Yeah I know and the world seems to agree..... Ron Paul.

Yeh, in internetz landz... (Of course I mean other than Luns)

In real life, however, isn't Ron Paul getting like 2% in the polls? Surely there is no conceivable way he could get the nomination...

Seriously though, retarded internet polls aside, who are tipped as the most likely candidates to win the election, as rated by the more respectable American opinion polling services?

I'm hoping you'll say Chris Dodd... but I'm interested to know who's actually likely to be the winner.

After Luns you mean?

by **Anarkistsdream** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:09 pm

Hillary or Obama for the Dems
Guliani or Thompson for the Reps

by **heavycola** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:30 pm

I* would elect obama, having put that stuff about bombing more brown people down to naivety.

But i ssuspect Hillary will be elected, jay and xtra will hunker down in their 'NWO bunker' made of empty cheerio boxes and life will carry on pretty much as normal.

*representing the rest of the world, natch

by **Chris7He** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:38 pm

The world? Most likely to be a Chinese/Indian person or the UN Secretary General.

by **Chris7He** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:41 pm

Whoops. Barack Obama. We're only hearing from people who understand English and use the internet.

by **Bartoli** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:41 pm

Who would the world elect?

i was going to say: of course not an american... :roll:

but this is for the american presidency

i guess a democratic president; republicans are known for their even more rightist politics than the democrats. and also bush has shown that they do not care the least about people in other countries...

And then: Obama or Hilary Clinton, cause they are the only known ones to me. (and i do follow politics unlike the mayority of the people)

personally: Obama, however hilary would make a chance because of her connection to Bill Clinton.

by **DaGip** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:25 pm

27651 votes for Ron Paul
8592 votes for Barack Obama
4417 votes for Dennis Kucinich
1762 votes for Hillary Clinton
1374 votes for Mike Gravel
993 votes for John Edwards
911 votes for Fred Thompson
767 votes for Rudy Giuliani
574 votes for Mitt Romney
458 votes for John McCain
427 votes for Bill Richardson
327 votes for Mike Huckabee
303 votes for Joe Biden
200 votes for Duncan Hunter
171 votes for Tom Tancredo
117 votes for Chris Dodd
73 votes for Sam Brownback

It is quite clear, Ron Paul is picked by the majority of Americans!

by **muy_thaiguy** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:58 pm

Bartoli wrote:Who would the world elect?

i was going to say: of course not an american... but this is for the american presidency

i guess a democratic president; republicans are known for their even more rightist politics than the democrats. and also bush has shown that they do not care the least about people in other countries...

And then: Obama or Hilary Clinton, cause they are the only known ones to me. (and i do follow politics unlike the mayority of the people)

personally: Obama, however hilary would make a chance because of her connection to Bill Clinton.

You dissapoint me.

by **Frigidus** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:10 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Bartoli wrote:Who would the world elect?

i was going to say: of course not an american... but this is for the american presidency

i guess a democratic president; republicans are known for their even more rightist politics than the democrats. and also bush has shown that they do not care the least about people in other countries...

And then: Obama or Hilary Clinton, cause they are the only known ones to me. (and i do follow politics unlike the mayority of the people)

personally: Obama, however hilary would make a chance because of her connection to Bill Clinton.
You dissapoint me.

That is actually how the rest of the world views our two parties, heheh. Right-Wing and Outrageously-Right-Wing.

by **Bartoli** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:11 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Bartoli wrote:Who would the world elect?

i was going to say: of course not an american... but this is for the american presidency

i guess a democratic president; republicans are known for their even more rightist politics than the democrats. and also bush has shown that they do not care the least about people in other countries...

And then: Obama or Hilary Clinton, cause they are the only known ones to me. (and i do follow politics unlike the mayority of the people)

personally: Obama, however hilary would make a chance because of her connection to Bill Clinton.
You dissapoint me.

in what sense?
sorry if i don't understand the american politics as you do; but the dominant american politics seem to be quite conservative, isnt it?

by **muy_thaiguy** on Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:21 pm

Maybe COnservative to you, but the Dems are Liberal to us Americans, as are some of the GOP candidates. I understand that the US is more conservative then most countries, but the US has always been a bit different from the rest of the world.

by **reverend_kyle** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:21 am

It's a good thing we listen to those Commies in Cuba who 99% elect Fidel every year. Because in Cuba Ron Paul is winning 3 votes for every 1 of another person.

by **reverend_kyle** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:24 am

Interesting, Ron Paul is also leading in Iraq and Iran who have also been known to elect psychos to office. Good thing N. Korea wasn't allowed to vote he'd probably be leading there too.

by **jay_a2j** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:10 am

reverend_kyle wrote:Interesting, Ron Paul is also leading in Iraq and Iran who have also been known to elect psychos to office. Good thing N. Korea wasn't allowed to vote he'd probably be leading there too.

Since when has Iran or Iraq (until recently) had free elections? :roll:

Yeah, the people in N. Korea would most likely vote in a heartless dictator like the one they now have. :roll:

by **Guiscard** on Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:21 pm

DaGip wrote:
27651 votes for Ron Paul
8592 votes for Barack Obama
4417 votes for Dennis Kucinich
1762 votes for Hillary Clinton
1374 votes for Mike Gravel
993 votes for John Edwards
911 votes for Fred Thompson
767 votes for Rudy Giuliani
574 votes for Mitt Romney
458 votes for John McCain
427 votes for Bill Richardson
327 votes for Mike Huckabee
303 votes for Joe Biden
200 votes for Duncan Hunter
171 votes for Tom Tancredo
117 votes for Chris Dodd
73 votes for Sam Brownback

It is quite clear, Ron Paul is picked by the majority of Americans!

The majority of Americans who have been linked to that site...

I think you'll have trouble finding any reliable national opinion polls from the REAL WORLD that put Ron Paul even in the top five...

Who would the world elect?

Who would the world elect?

Who is online