Page 1 of 3
Look at the nips of the Star Wars Girl
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:54 pmby xtratabasco
but enjoy the others first
http://zombietime.com/really_truly_hillary_gallery/
The question is
1 would you do her daughter?
2 Amerika is in trouble, kill me now (i know its not a question but please hurry)
3 What the f*ck look is that on Buschhh
4 Is that Indian blessing or cursing her
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:55 pmby soundout9
thats good...
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:56 pmby Frigidus
You promised nips xtra, nips! You've taken this too far.
Re: Look at the nips of the Star Wars Girl
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:58 pmby ignotus
I think this is your first proof that shows one real conspiracy.
This is anti-Hillary conspiracy!
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:59 pmby muy_thaiguy
I'm gonna have nightmares now.
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:03 pmby Anarkistsdream
Tell me that they didn't get FUCKED up!!!
I won't believe it.
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:05 pmby The Weird One
muy_thaiguy wrote:I'm gonna have nightmares now.
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:24 pmby ignotus
Anarkistsdream wrote:Tell me that they didn't get FUCKED up!!!
I won't believe it.
That's Janis Joplin... ups....
Hillary Clinton!
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:38 pmby muy_thaiguy
ignotus wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Tell me that they didn't get FUCKED up!!!
I won't believe it.
That's Janis Joplin... ups....
Hillary Clinton!
And I never knew Bill wore glasses or had back lenght hair.
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:42 pmby unriggable
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:44 pmby MeDeFe
Well done, xtra, now do the same for all the other candidates, ok?
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:53 pmby Stopper
Frigidus wrote:You promised nips xtra, nips! You've taken this too far.
They
are there. Xtra hasn't lied. I checked. I wouldn't have known it was the Star Trek girl, but they're there.
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:39 pmby Gilligan
Stopper wrote:Frigidus wrote:You promised nips xtra, nips! You've taken this too far.
They
are there. Xtra hasn't lied. I checked. I wouldn't have known it was the Star Trek girl, but they're there.
Yeah, they're there. And it's Star Wars, stopper, so I think you wouldn't have known
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:49 pmby Stopper
Gilligan wrote:Stopper wrote:Frigidus wrote:You promised nips xtra, nips! You've taken this too far.
They
are there. Xtra hasn't lied. I checked. I wouldn't have known it was the Star Trek girl, but they're there.
Yeah, they're there. And it's Star Wars, stopper, so I think you wouldn't have known
That's what I said - Star Trek.
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:15 pmby The Weird One
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:22 pmby Strife
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:56 pmby AAFitz
Anarkistsdream wrote:Tell me that they didn't get ***** up!!!
I won't believe it.
they did, but he didnt like it apparently
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:02 pmby muy_thaiguy
Always knew Hilary had a beard at one point.
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:31 pmby radiojake
Im neither a Hillary fan or opponent, as being Australian it doesn't effect me THAT much.. (though, American foreign policy pretty much effects the entire world generally)
But what does kinda annoy me (which that site emphasises) is for a womyn to get ahead in politics, she can't be 'ugly' or 'unattractive' because it will be constantly ridiculed. Not once have I heard how men in power are ugly fucks or unattractive, or had their appearance used against them.
Unless they decide to do the same for all the other candidates, It'll seem to me that they're only attacking her in this way because she is a womyn.
EDIT: By the way, those old pics of her and Bill from when he had hair... fucking hilarious.
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:48 pmby -ShadySoul-
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:03 pmby HayesA
You know, when I saw the title, I was REALLY expecting a nip slip of ether Princess Leia, or Natalie Portman.
This is very disappointing because Hilary Clinton fails. Like, a lot.
Posted:
Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:04 pmby -ShadySoul-
HayesA wrote:You know, when I saw the title, I was REALLY expecting a nip slip of ether Princess Leia, or Natalie Portman.
This is very disappointing because Hilary Clinton fails. Like, a lot.
like duh...
Posted:
Thu Nov 01, 2007 5:35 amby Jehan
radiojake wrote:Im neither a Hillary fan or opponent, as being Australian it doesn't effect me THAT much.. (though, American foreign policy pretty much effects the entire world generally)
But what does kinda annoy me (which that site emphasises) is for a womyn to get ahead in politics, she can't be 'ugly' or 'unattractive' because it will be constantly ridiculed. Not once have I heard how men in power are ugly fucks or unattractive, or had their appearance used against them.
Unless they decide to do the same for all the other candidates, It'll seem to me that they're only attacking her in this way because she is a womyn.
EDIT: By the way, those old pics of her and Bill from when he had hair... fucking hilarious.
dude have you already forgotten kim beazley? the fat jokes made about him could last a lifetime, and simon crean was pretty much unelectable, he just looked to evil.
Posted:
Thu Nov 01, 2007 7:10 amby radiojake
Jehan wrote: and simon crean was pretty much unelectable, he just looked to evil.
explain how Howard has been in power for 11 years. The female equivalent of his attractivness, or lack of, wouldnt be be in at all
Posted:
Thu Nov 01, 2007 7:36 amby xtratabasco
rj
Since you dont live here, ill give you the scoop.
our 2 parties are one in the same, theve sold out to corperations through the lobbiests.
they dont put the people her first.
there criminals and out of touch with the working man.
it dont matter that hillary has a cunt or rudi has a dick, there both the same animal.
that is why, before a revolution, ron paul might be able to change things.
