Page 1 of 1

Was Mao Zedong an ideal leader for China?

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:45 am
by haoala
The question above has a typo, add ideal between "an" and "leader".

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:48 am
by nagerous
No

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:17 am
by Titanic
No

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:29 am
by AlgyTaylor
"Mao Tse Tung said ... Change must come through the barrel of a gun"

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:43 am
by Stopper
Pole question wrote:Was Mao Zedong an leader for China??


Yes he was. Between 1949 and 1974 or something. I might be a couple of years out on the dates, but I can't be bothered to check Wikipedia at the minute.

You can't catch us out with your tricksy questioning that easily.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:03 am
by samuelanonymous
hehe what a funny question :)

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:39 am
by MeDeFe
I thought the same Stopper, of course he was the leader of China.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:43 am
by flashleg8
Stopper wrote:
Pole question wrote:Was Mao Zedong an leader for China??


Yes he was. Between 1949 and 1974 or something. I might be a couple of years out on the dates, but I can't be bothered to check Wikipedia at the minute.

You can't catch us out with your tricksy questioning that easily.


No, it was Mao Tse-tung :)

But seriously:

I have a great respect for the work he and his party undertook to industrialise and unify China, though I can never support the hysteria and chaos, he unleased at the height of the cultural revolution.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:47 am
by haoala
sorry guys that was a typo

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:15 am
by ZawBanjito
Gee, anyone here Chinese? Wow, none of you? Really?

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:13 am
by haoala
ZawBanjito wrote:Gee, anyone here Chinese? Wow, none of you? Really?
i am! and i'm proud of it!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:26 am
by Norse
I think, considering the climate of china at the time (ie. the occupation of the kuomingtan) he was a good leader to bring into the fold. He had a very nationalistic approach, and he gave china back to the people.

However, and it is a large however, he then went onto kill his own people, in a paranoid witch hunt, that he labelled as "class-action".

So maybe after winning back china, he should have just died....

But then again, flashleg8 wouldnt have anything to bleat about. :wink:

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:36 am
by diddle
possibly, but after the fiasco with the moose, things took a drastic turn

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:38 am
by muy_thaiguy
Don't forget he tried a version of Stalin's 5 year plan, and it back fired just as badly, if not worse. :wink:

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:46 pm
by autoload
Finish Him!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:23 pm
by jako
NO

the chaos and suffering he inflicted on china far outweights any good he did at the beginning

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:04 pm
by flashleg8
muy_thaiguy wrote:Don't forget he tried a version of Stalin's 5 year plan, and it back fired just as badly, if not worse. :wink:


"The Great Leap Forward"

I would disagree it backfired though.




Or Baa Baa Baa (as Norse would say :) )

Incidently Motherwell FC's fanzine is called "Waiting for the Great Leap Forward" - to be honest I think we'll be waiting a while!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:06 pm
by cleveridea
If having a sexually perverted murderous monster is ideal, then yes. Otherwise, no.