Page 1 of 2
HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray!

Posted:
Fri Aug 31, 2007 11:39 am
by Minister Masket
What with all the rambling and the arguing and the GWAYHAY over the consoles, I thought I'd introduce this aspect - the format of films.
Orf you go!

Posted:
Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:34 pm
by AtomicSlug
Blue-ray is superior. But then again, wasn't beta-max better than VHS?
Personally I'm really tired of corporations dictating which tech. we should use. I want the better one, and screw the corporations who spend bazillions on promoting an inferior technology!

Posted:
Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:37 pm
by pancakemix
This new format wars is like Windows Vista. I'll go eventually, but I'll go kicking and screaming. As long as they make DVDs, I'm staying there.

Posted:
Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:40 pm
by XenHu
Well said..
-X

Posted:
Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:43 pm
by Iliad
pancakemix wrote:This new format wars is like Windows Vista. I'll go eventually, but I'll go kicking and screaming. As long as they make DVDs, I'm staying there.
QFT

Posted:
Fri Aug 31, 2007 11:01 pm
by cawck mongler
Well, actually being good is better then just having potential.

Posted:
Fri Aug 31, 2007 11:03 pm
by static_ice
it doesn't matter how good it is, what matters is that the format that you have wins.
WHEN blu-ray dies, they will slowly stop making discs for it, and then everyone who bought a player is stuck with an expensive but useless antique

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:58 am
by cleveridea
Both are fundamentally worthless to me until their blank media and writing device costs are competitive with existing technologies.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:06 am
by static_ice
cleveridea wrote:Both are fundamentally worthless to me until their blank media and writing device costs are competitive with existing technologies.
good point, as I will probably never own either of them until they come built in to a pc or an
affordable game system


Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:59 am
by Minister Masket
static_ice wrote:cleveridea wrote:Both are fundamentally worthless to me until their blank media and writing device costs are competitive with existing technologies.
good point, as I will probably never own either of them until they come built in to a pc or an
affordable game system

Effing cheapskate...
The PS3
is affordable you bloody peasant!

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:17 am
by static_ice
Minister Masket wrote:static_ice wrote:cleveridea wrote:Both are fundamentally worthless to me until their blank media and writing device costs are competitive with existing technologies.
good point, as I will probably never own either of them until they come built in to a pc or an
affordable game system

Effing cheapskate...
The PS3
is affordable you bloody peasant!
umm not everyone is rich believe it or not there are people in "rich" america that make less money than you do


Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:22 am
by reverend_kyle
blue ray is able to do 1080p hd dvd can only do 1080i....
the answer is actually able to be proven..
blue ray.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:27 am
by static_ice
reverend_kyle wrote:blue ray is able to do 1080p hd dvd can only do 1080i....
the answer is actually able to be proven..
blue ray.
but there's more to it than power, they're price, and reliability and hd beats bluray in both categories

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:29 am
by cleveridea
static_ice wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:blue ray is able to do 1080p hd dvd can only do 1080i....
the answer is actually able to be proven..
blue ray.
but there's more to it than power, they're price, and reliability and hd beats bluray in both categories
Why is HD-DVD more reliable than Blu-Ray?

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:30 am
by static_ice
cleveridea wrote:static_ice wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:blue ray is able to do 1080p hd dvd can only do 1080i....
the answer is actually able to be proven..
blue ray.
but there's more to it than power, they're price, and reliability and hd beats bluray in both categories
Why is HD-DVD more reliable than Blu-Ray?
faster, less laggyness, from what I've heard

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:30 am
by reverend_kyle
static_ice wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:blue ray is able to do 1080p hd dvd can only do 1080i....
the answer is actually able to be proven..
blue ray.
but there's more to it than power, they're price, and reliability and hd beats bluray in both categories
it said which is better not which is cheapest.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:37 am
by static_ice
well, better can mean which is the better buy... but thats another argument... okay well there's also reliability

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:39 am
by reverend_kyle
static_ice wrote:well, better can mean which is the better buy... but thats another argument... okay well there's also reliability
I don't see a point for either one, but if i'm going for one I'd go for blueray because you can get one of those that plays games.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:42 am
by static_ice
what about 360?

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:05 pm
by Minister Masket
Thank you Reverend. Wise words from CC's most holy of pastors.
static_ice wrote:umm not everyone is rich believe it or not there are people in "rich" america that make less money than you do
So much for democracy then...

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:02 pm
by AtomicSlug
Isn't anyone else at all concerned that mega-corporations dictate which technology we should use?
You can always buy a dual player (HDDVD+BlueRay], or u can wait, like I'm going to do. I just wish I had a say in it and I wish these idiotic scientists and corporations and movie studios would work together in advancing technology, not against each other. Then again, I wish for peace on earth, and that's never gonna happen.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 3:27 pm
by static_ice
Minister Masket wrote:Thank you Reverend. Wise words from CC's most holy of pastors.
static_ice wrote:umm not everyone is rich believe it or not there are people in "rich" america that make less money than you do
So much for democracy then...
haha, wow you thought democracy made everyone in america rich?


Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 3:29 pm
by unriggable
HD is better, since I can watch Shrek 3 on it.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:37 pm
by reverend_kyle
static_ice wrote::lol:
what about 360?
How could I forget the 360, the hddvd player that you have to buy the 200$ hddvd drive for it to be able to do that.

Posted:
Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:28 pm
by unriggable
reverend_kyle wrote:static_ice wrote::lol:
what about 360?
How could I forget the 360, the hddvd player that you have to buy the 200$ hddvd drive for it to be able to do that.
No you don't.