Conquer Club

CRAYOLA wrote:HECTOR IS NO LONGER THE SPAM KING


MY REIGN OF TERROR RETURNS


HAHAHAHAHAAHA

AND LLAMAS SHALL FALL FROM THE SKY.

static_ice wrote:Thus in the future beautiful people will become extinct!

Kaplowitz wrote:

static_ice wrote:Thus in the future beautiful people will become extinct!

YES! Im saved!

CRAYOLA wrote:HECTOR IS NO LONGER THE SPAM KING


MY REIGN OF TERROR RETURNS


HAHAHAHAHAAHA

AND LLAMAS SHALL FALL FROM THE SKY.

so if Number 4 is correct, my theory is that since beautiful people tend to find other beautiful people as mates more often than they find fugly people, the majority of their total children will be female, and eventually through time almost all of the beautiful people in a generation will be female, and then Darwin's Laws will come into play; Survival of the Fittest, it will be harder for beautiful people to survive because they will almost all be female, Thus in the future beautiful people will become extinct!

static_ice wrote:Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters

never read the book of course but the Tribune gave a mini-review by giving 5 facts/quotes from the book; my eye caught it and I think they're all pretty interesting...

1. In our hunter-gatherer days, eating calorie-dense foods increased survivability, explaining our taste for desserts

2. "Men prefer younger women because they have greater reproductive value...than older women", which explains why men (such as college professors) who are exposed to females in their peak fertility years have higher divorce rates

3. Men prefer blonds because blond hair indicates youth and thus fertility.

5. Why do well-known politicians have affairs? Powerful men through history have had lovers to "mate" with, as well as a legal wife, and have produced many offspring.

(I switched 5 and 4 because I think its fitting for 4 to be last)

4. Beautiful people tend to have more daughters because beauty helps women more when it comes to attracting a long-term mate, and if parents have a trait that's better for daughters than sons, they'll have more girls.

so if Number 4 is correct, my theory is that since beautiful people tend to find other beautiful people as mates more often than they find fugly people, the majority of their total children will be female, and eventually through time almost all of the beautiful people in a generation will be female, and then Darwin's Laws will come into play; Survival of the Fittest, it will be harder for beautiful people to survive because they will almost all be female, Thus in the future beautiful people will become extinct!

Titanic wrote:

so if Number 4 is correct, my theory is that since beautiful people tend to find other beautiful people as mates more often than they find fugly people, the majority of their total children will be female, and eventually through time almost all of the beautiful people in a generation will be female, and then Darwin's Laws will come into play; Survival of the Fittest, it will be harder for beautiful people to survive because they will almost all be female, Thus in the future beautiful people will become extinct!

Why?!?

static_ice wrote:

Titanic wrote:

so if Number 4 is correct, my theory is that since beautiful people tend to find other beautiful people as mates more often than they find fugly people, the majority of their total children will be female, and eventually through time almost all of the beautiful people in a generation will be female, and then Darwin's Laws will come into play; Survival of the Fittest, it will be harder for beautiful people to survive because they will almost all be female, Thus in the future beautiful people will become extinct!

Why?!?

can't you read? the books says beautiful people have more daughters and eventually those daughters will have more daughters and so forth until slowly after thousands of generations... get it?

skittles why'd you have to ruin my fun with that theory?

cawck mongler wrote:

static_ice wrote:

Titanic wrote:

so if Number 4 is correct, my theory is that since beautiful people tend to find other beautiful people as mates more often than they find fugly people, the majority of their total children will be female, and eventually through time almost all of the beautiful people in a generation will be female, and then Darwin's Laws will come into play; Survival of the Fittest, it will be harder for beautiful people to survive because they will almost all be female, Thus in the future beautiful people will become extinct!

Why?!?

can't you read? the books says beautiful people have more daughters and eventually those daughters will have more daughters and so forth until slowly after thousands of generations... get it?

skittles why'd you have to ruin my fun with that theory?

f*ck THIS MOTHERFUCKING BULLSHIT, in the middle ages people thought being a fatass was hot (TO BAD YOU ARN'T IN THE MIDDLE AGES, HUH?!) and that didn't matter anyways because people traded their daughters away for cows (yes its redundant, I know) rarely would people marry purely for attraction. Peoples opinions on whats hot change and most people in the past mated whether they were attractive or not.

YOUR THEORY IS GAY AND RETARDED.

static_ice wrote:

cawck mongler wrote:

static_ice wrote:

Titanic wrote:

so if Number 4 is correct, my theory is that since beautiful people tend to find other beautiful people as mates more often than they find fugly people, the majority of their total children will be female, and eventually through time almost all of the beautiful people in a generation will be female, and then Darwin's Laws will come into play; Survival of the Fittest, it will be harder for beautiful people to survive because they will almost all be female, Thus in the future beautiful people will become extinct!

Why?!?

can't you read? the books says beautiful people have more daughters and eventually those daughters will have more daughters and so forth until slowly after thousands of generations... get it?

skittles why'd you have to ruin my fun with that theory?

f*ck THIS MOTHERFUCKING BULLSHIT, in the middle ages people thought being a fatass was hot (TO BAD YOU ARN'T IN THE MIDDLE AGES, HUH?!) and that didn't matter anyways because people traded their daughters away for cows (yes its redundant, I know) rarely would people marry purely for attraction. Peoples opinions on whats hot change and most people in the past mated whether they were attractive or not.

YOUR THEORY IS GAY AND RETARDED.

and you must have dropped your sarcasm radar a few stories, while my Gaydar is blinking rapidly when I point it towards your username. Or maybe you thought this was in the flame wars

okay I'm not fat and while I'm not judging you I would bet that I'm more likely to kick your ass than the other way around.

Sure, whatever I'll believe your mumbo jumbo but eventually the "beautiful gene" will run out as it is spread from the select beautiful females to the less beautiful males until its evenly and minimally spread throughout the whole human race.

The only reason I took the time to correct you is because I'm waiting for one of my turns

cawck mongler wrote:
Hey asshole, you can steal all the futurama jokes you want I don't care, BUT KNOW THAT I WOULD TEAR YOUR ASS TO SHREADS IF YOU EVER FUCKED WITH ME IN REAL LIFE.

unriggable wrote:Lets play the naming game. Cawk mongler is a cock sucker.

The Kurgan wrote:Hang on... If all the beautiful people are wiped out, then our concept of beauty will be changed because there is nothing to compare.

static_ice wrote:

The Kurgan wrote:Hang on... If all the beautiful people are wiped out, then our concept of beauty will be changed because there is nothing to compare.

good insight.

so beauty as we know it today will be wiped out

Titanic wrote:

static_ice wrote:

The Kurgan wrote:Hang on... If all the beautiful people are wiped out, then our concept of beauty will be changed because there is nothing to compare.

good insight.

so beauty as we know it today will be wiped out

But we'll still have pictures and videos of the beautiful people today, so the generations along will watch them as porn or something.

cawck mongler wrote:

static_ice wrote:

Titanic wrote:

so if Number 4 is correct, my theory is that since beautiful people tend to find other beautiful people as mates more often than they find fugly people, the majority of their total children will be female, and eventually through time almost all of the beautiful people in a generation will be female, and then Darwin's Laws will come into play; Survival of the Fittest, it will be harder for beautiful people to survive because they will almost all be female, Thus in the future beautiful people will become extinct!

Why?!?

can't you read? the books says beautiful people have more daughters and eventually those daughters will have more daughters and so forth until slowly after thousands of generations... get it?

skittles why'd you have to ruin my fun with that theory?

f*ck THIS MOTHERFUCKING BULLSHIT, in the middle ages people thought being a fatass was hot (TO BAD YOU ARN'T IN THE MIDDLE AGES, HUH?!) and that didn't matter anyways because people traded their daughters away for cows (yes its redundant, I know) rarely would people marry purely for attraction. Peoples opinions on whats hot change and most people in the past mated whether they were attractive or not.

YOUR THEORY IS GAY AND RETARDED.