Moderator: Community Team
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:SUCCESS
✓ Taiwan has agreed to unilaterally drop its tariff rate for U.S. imports to 0%
✓ Zimbabwe has agreed to unilaterally drop its tariff rate for U.S. imports to 0%
IN PROGRESS
- Vietnam has announced no retaliatory tariffs and will instead enter immediate negotiations with Washington
- India has announced no retaliatory tariffs and will instead enter immediate negotiations with Washington
- Cambodia has announced no retaliatory tariffs and will instead enter immediate negotiations with Washington
- Indonesia has announced no retaliatory tariffs and will instead enter immediate negotiations with Washington
FAILURE
X China announces 34% retaliatory tariffs
DEAD MAN WALKING
✠ European Union saber rattling with a rusty dagger
justplay4fun wrote:AND your EU comments are interesting observations. Let's see what our European friends have to say.
Silvertop wrote:Meanwhile
Bill Ackman, an American billionaire whose fortune is estimated at $9.3 billion, said Monday that Donald Trump is losing the confidence of business leaders. Ackman therefore asked Trump to pause his trade war. A striking statement from Ackman, who supported Trump during his candidacy for president.
In a lengthy social media post, the billionaire wrote that the president "has a chance to declare a 90-day timeout." That is the time it would take to resolve any trade issues through negotiations. "If, on the other hand, we unleash a nuclear economic war against every country in the world, business investment will grind to a halt," the billionaire said.
"Consumers will close their wallets and we will cause serious damage to our reputation with the rest of the world that will take years and possibly decades to repair."
Many more to follow...
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:
In any case, we can't declare a "timeout" after just 12 days. How would WW2 have ended if Belgium had surrendered to Germany after 12 days? Oh wait ...
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
jimboston wrote:The tariffs/trade war that Trump is initiating is NOT the worst thing he’s doing… but it’s pretty bad.
I agree with the long-term goal of trying to re-shore some manufacturing and become less reliant on other countries for the vast majority of our consumer goods. That goal however is in conflict with Trump’s stated immigration policies. I also think that it is only a goal that can be achieved with long-term policies and buy-in from both political parties… as any attempt to do this unilaterally could result in a reversal of these policies under the next administration / congress.
A few points…
*Just because Trump “wrote” a book called the Art of the Deal does NOT mean he is good at making deals. He has been bankrupt numerous times. He’s only been saved from bankruptcy because he became a celebrity. He is NOT a self-made man… he inherited his initial wealth from his father. Much of his money in real estate has been made by lying and breaking deals… not paying contracts/contractors, then making them threaten to take him to court… and finally “negotiating” the amount due down. These “business tactics” that he used his whole career are not great, and though they kinda work in the real estate market where he made his money they are NOT tactics that will work in International space. They “worked” because they took advantage of weaknesses in our legal system… these tricks don’t translate to international negotiations between Nations.
*Even if he does wind up “making deals” the chaos he is flooding the system with will cause (and has already caused) people to lose money, and will disrupt what was a strengthening economy. The economy cannot just immediately ‘bounce back’. Even if he were able to make deals with all the major players the disruption will set us back and cause economic pain. That said, it seems unlikely he will be able to use these ‘tactics’ to make deals with all the major players… or at least not quickly enough. Current projections have changed from an economy that was on solid ground with shrinking inflation… to an economy that will experience rising inflation and at least a modest downturn if not an outright recession.
*Finally, this is not necessarily a win-lose proposition when we look at how these tariffs and this trade war will affect other countries. More likely it is a lose-lose proposition. The most likely outcome is that these trade issues will cause economic issues both here at home, and also abroad. So people who claim that “China and the EU can get along fine without us”… yeah maybe in the long term they can, but in the short term they will both lose. At the same time people who claim that “the DAX is Germany has fallen, they’ll capitulate”… I mean yeah it’s true that the DAX will drop, but so won’t the DOW Jones. We will ALL feel the pain… and if he doesn’t pull back it won’t be a short term thing… it COULD spark a recession or stagflation that lasts YEARS.
In the end… a decade from now… we might be able to say we brought some manufacturing back. I don’t know… it’s impossible to predict. I am confident enough to say that the path to that future is very likely to be unpleasant for many Americans. I feel a slower and more thoughtful approach with bipartisan support could achieve the same results with less pain and disruption over the same decade-long period.
saxitoxin wrote:Update:
The U.S. will retaliate against China's retaliation and increase tariffs to 104%.
jusplay4fun wrote:1) Bring down the Federal Debt for each of the next few fiscal years.
2) Perhaps reduce the overall TOTAL US deficit (to take the pressure off our Children and the Grandchildren, too).
3) Reduce the Federal work force to be "leaner AND more efficient" as done in MANY businesses over the past 30-40 years or more.
4) Reduce the federal budget by cutting waste and finding fraud, as happened already, based on (ONLY very) few examples cited by DOGE, Musk, and Trump.
5) The stock market recovers its losses in the next 6-15 months.
6) Bring down the rate of inflation and be able to offset any inflationary pressures caused by new tariffs, and by Trump's disruption of the Federal expenditures and budget.
7) Allow expansion AND growth of Businesses. AND, finally, for now,
8 ) Bring back some businesses and factories from overseas so that the US is LESS reliant on manufacturing overseas. This will bring some good paying jobs to America, such as in the Steel and Aluminum manufacturing businesses. I really think the US has allowed its industrial and manufacturing base to ERODE over that past 30-40 years to the detriment of our nation. Depending on China for pharmaceutical supplies and chemicals is a prime example of the need for SOME manufacturing in the USA.
More Federal money is NOT the solution to every problem. If it were, we would have a BOOMING Economy NOW, before Trump took office.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
jusplay4fun wrote:EVEN IF the tariffs and deals do not work as well as Trump PROCLAIMS (usually with LOTS of hyperbole, so that is a safe bet, btw), the USA is BETTER off than if we elected Kamala or re-elected Biden. There is LITTLE doubt about that, IF Trump can achive SOME or Most of the following:
mookiemcgee wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:1) Bring down the Federal Debt for each of the next few fiscal years.
2) Perhaps reduce the overall TOTAL US deficit (to take the pressure off our Children and the Grandchildren, too).
3) Reduce the Federal work force to be "leaner AND more efficient" as done in MANY businesses over the past 30-40 years or more.
4) Reduce the federal budget by cutting waste and finding fraud, as happened already, based on (ONLY very) few examples cited by DOGE, Musk, and Trump.
5) The stock market recovers its losses in the next 6-15 months.
6) Bring down the rate of inflation and be able to offset any inflationary pressures caused by new tariffs, and by Trump's disruption of the Federal expenditures and budget.
7) Allow expansion AND growth of Businesses. AND, finally, for now,
8 ) Bring back some businesses and factories from overseas so that the US is LESS reliant on manufacturing overseas. This will bring some good paying jobs to America, such as in the Steel and Aluminum manufacturing businesses. I really think the US has allowed its industrial and manufacturing base to ERODE over that past 30-40 years to the detriment of our nation. Depending on China for pharmaceutical supplies and chemicals is a prime example of the need for SOME manufacturing in the USA.
More Federal money is NOT the solution to every problem. If it were, we would have a BOOMING Economy NOW, before Trump took office.
Let us know when you actually come across any actual evidence of these things happening.
So far in spite of what he says in speeches Trump has:
1) Increased borrowing and pushed the Fed to reduce rates and print more money
2) Reduced GDP growth by 6+%/year in his first quarter in office
3) Reduced the federal workforce with reckless abandon rather than looking for and eliminating inefficiencies (which is what real business do)
4) Not brought one claim of actual fraud to any courts based on existing gov't spending. Defined 'waste' as spending on libraries, the forestry service, Health and Human services, small business administration, the postal service, the dept of veteran affairs, the National Institute of Health and the dept of Defense among others. Only time will tell if these agencies will be able to operate efficiently moving forward or if they will break down to non/barely functioning status.
5) Has chosen to institute a new sales tax on American consumers, which has tanked the stock market, and has done so against the advice of political friends and foes alike.
6) Has increased inflationary pressures to levels not seen in 100 years. I don't know what kinda ayahuasca you must be smoking to claim he's bringing down the rate of inflation.
7) He has created economic uncertainty which is causing slower consumer demand, and causing business to retrench and avoid investment in future growth (both domestically and overseas).in 5-10 years IF WE MAINTAIN LARGE TARIFFS THE WHOLE TIME, could bring back factories that will be heavily automated and may create some low paying jobs but is likely to boost domestic production of goods... We of course will have a really hard time exporting any of them in this hypothetical because of reciprocal tariffs... and in the meantime we can look forward to years and years of stagflation with increased unemployment, lower demand, and shrinking GDP.
9) We had a booming economy when Trump took office in Jan, as evidence by the inflation rate dropping to from 7% to 3% in Jan 2025 over the course of the Biden Admin, the S&P hitting new highs and larger growth in our 2024 GDP numbers than the next 10 largest economies in the world combined.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
HitRed wrote:Congress gave the power to FDR. 1934 I believe. Democrats to a Democrat.
Found it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_Tariff_Act
“By giving the President the authority to negotiate the deals, the Congress effectively ceded a part of its power (authorized under US Constitution, Article I, Section VIII) to the executive branch. The President had to consider the welfare of all Americans, his foreign policy priorities, and what was feasible with other countries in making his decisions on tariffs.”
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:
For your overall con-theory - If this doom prediction starts to play out, 'the next president' would be Trump. You don't spend a decade breaking down institutions until they bend to your will just to walk away from all of it in 2028. He could run as vice and have president step down (probably still unconstitutional), he could become speaker of the house and have both president and vice step down (slightly less unconstitutional), he could run as vice president and just have a puppet be president (like Medvedev in Russia 2008-2012) or he could just run and ignore the courts (the constitution doesn't matter anymore/full constitutional crisis/ requires unbreakable leverage on Supreme court and congress).
HitRed wrote:Imagine if Trump won as a anti-war, blue collar supporting Democrat.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:Imagine if Trump won as a anti-war, blue collar supporting Democrat.
Imagine if Trump was Bernie Sanders? Then you wouldn't vote for him, and he wouldn't win of ever come to power because Fox would call him a communist/athiest who wanted to take the hard earned money of billionaires and reinvest it in higher paying jobs and infrastructure for the lower/middle class, which would most likely mean growing the monetary size of gov't. This is the fundamental reason why america is failing, it's not because we import more than we export... it's because wealth inequality is eroding the middle class and instead of trickling down, wealth his consistently trickled up for 50+ years. Seems like basically everyone agrees that this has happened, we just don't all agree that it's a problem and in what a solution would look like... in part because billionaires funnel tons of money into influencing us and keep us divided by talking about some trans kid in Kansas who wants to run track and field with the women.
bigtoughralf wrote:The whole 'right wing/left wing' thing has totally changed meaning in countries like the US and UK over the last decade or so. It's no longer primarily about being economically left or right wing, it's about being socially left or right wing.
Given that higher income people tend to be more socially liberal on average, it would make sense that a right wing party appealing to cultural conservatism would start finding its base shift to poorer workers.
It's the same in the UK. The Labour party has shifted from being the party of manual workers to the party of urban middle classes, and the Conservative party is in the process of being replaced by the Reform party, whose whole schtick is basically watered-down Trumpism designed to appeal to poorer and more rural regions.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Users browsing this forum: No registered users