Conquer Club

I've previously said this will become increasingly common for vaccinated people to get recurring infections the more shots they get as their immune systems are debilitated and they lack T-Cell immunity to the virus, instead relying on the crutch of the junk mRNA shots. And I'm being proved correct both by observation of the Idiocracy running America, coupled with emerging scientific research:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamane ... ct/2794886

The CDC is also correct when they say each of these infections will be largely mild.

What they omit, however, is that the chance of Long COVID increases with each infection, regardless of severity.

https://www.gpb.org/news/2022/07/21/rei ... ach%20said.

So, if you're vaxed, you will continue to get reinfected and, with each infection, you get closer and closer to being introduced to lifetime Long COVID and, with it, loss of taste, insomnia, chronic fatigue, brain fog, etc. It's not if but when. Only a matter of time.

saxitoxin wrote:UPDATE:

According to this photo, it appears COVID-19 has already robbed Jill of her sense of taste.

Maxleod wrote:You're beating a dead horse saxi.

The people who can still think for themselves, like me, and you apparently, didn't get the vax and won't get it.

The lambs have been brainwashed and will never admit they are wrong, They're hopeless.

mookiemcgee wrote:

More likely to be saxi or ralf?

mookiemcgee wrote:

More likely to be saxi or ralf?

jimboston wrote:Total number versus % of employed persons… add in factors for newly returned to office, lax reporting for smaller companies, lax reporting for milder cases, etc.

jimboston wrote:they’ve been saying for MONTHS now that the shot isn’t really effective at stopping you from getting it

jimboston wrote:Unfortunately they didn’t have great data at the time

saxitoxin wrote:
In other words, you better pray that, suddenly, my predictions stop coming true because I'm batting 100

saxitoxin wrote:
and the really bad ones are still 6 to 18 months out.

jimboston wrote:
I’m betting in 6-18 months you’ll continue to state that the bad shit is about 6-18 months away…

saxitoxin wrote:OK, now this is rich!

Remember when saxi said you'd have to be a fool to take a vaccine with an EUA permit versus a BL license since these companies will be insulated from lawsuits and have no financial incentive to get the formulation right? Remember when I said that Johnson & Johnson made baby powder that gave people cancer --- and that was when they were on the hook for $2 billion? And that vaccines were more complicated than baby powder? Remember?

Sooo ... the Pfizer whistleblower first chronicled by the British Medical Journal [https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635], a former regional lab director who says Pfizer covered up all of the negative side effects during testing that are now coming to light --- and indicators of potential lethal side effects that will emerge on the 3-5 year timeframe -- is now in court.

Pfizer's defense?

Not that his claims are inaccurate, but that they can't be sued because of the EUA, ergo the case must be dismissed!

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/62 ... rch-group/

Individuals who are fully vaccinated for COVID-19 are now shown to be at a higher risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to unvaccinated individuals.4

jimboston wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:OK, now this is rich!

Remember when saxi said you'd have to be a fool to take a vaccine with an EUA permit versus a BL license since these companies will be insulated from lawsuits and have no financial incentive to get the formulation right? Remember when I said that Johnson & Johnson made baby powder that gave people cancer --- and that was when they were on the hook for $2 billion? And that vaccines were more complicated than baby powder? Remember?

Sooo ... the Pfizer whistleblower first chronicled by the British Medical Journal [https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635], a former regional lab director who says Pfizer covered up all of the negative side effects during testing that are now coming to light --- and indicators of potential lethal side effects that will emerge on the 3-5 year timeframe -- is now in court.

Pfizer's defense?

Not that his claims are inaccurate, but that they can't be sued because of the EUA, ergo the case must be dismissed!

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/62 ... rch-group/

So the lawsuit says this…

Individuals who are fully vaccinated for COVID-19 are now shown to be at a higher risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to unvaccinated individuals.4

Then you go click on the link to the study it referenced… i.e. <note 4>…
and so you read the study and no where in there do I see evidence confirming what is being said in the lawsuit.

Also factors…
- size of the population studied in the referenced study
- questions related to common ethnicity/genetics of people in study
- other factors like who’s getting the vaccine… if a higher % of “at risk” people are getting the vax then you have to factor that out of your math to see if there’s an actual negative impact and/or if the impact is actually beneficial

So yeah… keep trying.

I mean regardless of the math and study questions… the study (as far as I can tell) doesn;t say what the lawsuit is claiming it says.

saxitoxin wrote:

jimboston wrote:
I’m betting in 6-18 months you’ll continue to state that the bad shit is about 6-18 months away…

Uh huh. Except the history of each of my predictions here says I've been spot on.

That said, I bet next week you'll continue to say Trump is weeks away from being indicted. And five years from now he'll still be weeks away from indictment.

Bad news everyone - the Biden Death Jabs will not protect against the new Nigerian strain of COVID-19 which will soon overtake the world. Turns out Biden's vaccine program was just a huge waste of money with no benefit except causing a lot of permanent erectile dysfunction.

Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 2.1 to 22.9); risk ratio 1.43 (95 % CI 1.07 to 1.92). The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group; risk difference 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group: risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI –23.2 to 37.4); risk ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33).Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI −3.2 to 29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39).

We emphasize that our investigation is preliminary, to point to the need for more involved analysis ... Full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data is needed to properly evaluate these questions. Unfortunately, as we approach 2 years after release of COVID-19 vaccines, participant level data remain inaccessible.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... X22010283#!

saxitoxin wrote:The headline is click bait. The details should give you only mild comfort.

More bad news for the vaxed from a new study by UCLA and Stanford scientists published in the current issue of the Q1 peer-reviewed journal Vaccine, out today:

Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 2.1 to 22.9); risk ratio 1.43 (95 % CI 1.07 to 1.92). The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group; risk difference 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group: risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI –23.2 to 37.4); risk ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33).Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI −3.2 to 29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39).

We emphasize that our investigation is preliminary, to point to the need for more involved analysis ... Full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data is needed to properly evaluate these questions. Unfortunately, as we approach 2 years after release of COVID-19 vaccines, participant level data remain inaccessible.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... X22010283#!

Weird that Big Pharma still refuses, after two years, to release participant level trial data. Since the executives of the megacorporations are all trustworthy egalitarians who are only interested in helping humanity, it is obviously just an oversight and not anything they're hiding.

jusplay4fun wrote:I am not convinced about the "DANGERS" of the COVID vaccines.