I did listen to more than half of it. Generally I'm intolerant of long speeches. Most people take an hour to say what you could read in five minutes. In an uncharacteristic display of patience, I did listen to more than half.
He's right of course. This was definitely an inside job. These are buildings hardened against anything except a direct nuclear strike. No way would a mob be allowed to seize the capitol without co-operation from people inside. This event was publicized for weeks. Why weren't there extra barricades, cops on horseback, cops in helicopters?
If a leftist mob had tried to seize the capitol, they would have been mowed down with machine guns. A rightist mob is allowed to run rampant. Even the ones that have been arrested have been charged with trivial things like trespassing instead of domestic terrorism and sedition.
Nobody was charged in the mob that seized the Michigan state house, either. Right-wing and white-supremacist permeated all the major police forces. The lack of consequences in Michigan were part of what emboldened the Trumpists to do this. The further lack of consequences (yes, a few are being charged, but the vast majority are getting away scot-free, and even the ones charged are being charged with Mickey Mouse shit like trespassing) for this will embolden the next step.
There will be more incidents.
2dimes"I especially hope any future protests can be as peaceful as possible.[/quote]
This was not a protest. A protest is an airing of grievances. This was an attempt to intimidate elected representatives through fear. It's terrorism, plain and simple.
[quote="2dimes wrote:I have chipped away at another ten minutes and I vaguely agree that President Trump should have use clear language to oppose the crowds entering the building.
What, "We love you, you're very special" wasn't strong enough? Should he have said, "I worship the ground you walk on, since you're doing my dirty work!"?