Moderator: Community Team
Dukasaur wrote:In the 1950s, educated people voted for right-wing parties and the ignorant voted for left-wing parties.
The trend has gradually flipped -- in France starting with the '69 election, in the U.S. starting with the '72 election, and in Britain starting with the '74 election.
http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Piketty2018.pdf#page=73
Right-wing populists, with their thuggish appeals to xenophobia and "traditional values" have to a large degree succeeded in persuading the workers to be willing co-conspirators in their own exploitation. Only education, and a lot of it, offers some shield against the brainwashing of the right.
Dukasaur wrote:... if the shoe fits....
NomadPatriot wrote:Dukasaur wrote:... if the shoe fits....
exactly..
you have no issues showing your prejudice & Hatred & that you will Discriminate againist any member who is right leaning..
NomadPatriot wrote:which has become very obvious.
this is Conquer Club.. you represent it. .
there is no point in denying it or attempting to backtrack your statements...
Dukasaur wrote:NomadPatriot wrote:Dukasaur wrote:... if the shoe fits....
exactly..
you have no issues showing your prejudice & Hatred & that you will Discriminate againist any member who is right leaning..
Now that, my friend, is a lie. I have never discriminated against anyone regardless of my opinion of them. As much as I may hold negative opinions about you, I have never treated you with anything except absolutely exemplary fairness.
I have gotten literally dozens of messages from people suggesting you should be banned, but I've only given you one very short ban (which you must admit was richly deserved.) Unlike you right-wingers, I believe above all in behaving ethically and honourably, and have never let my opinion of you influence my treatment of you.NomadPatriot wrote:which has become very obvious.
this is Conquer Club.. you represent it. .
there is no point in denying it or attempting to backtrack your statements...
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
2dimes wrote:You'll need better bait to catch a Saxi.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Dr. Noah Carl of the University of Oxford wrote:Individuals who identify as Republican have slightly higher verbal intelligence (2–5 IQ points).
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 614000373#!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
mrswdk wrote:Because having a degree = not ignorant and not having a degree = ignorant
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Dukasaur wrote:In the 1950s, educated people voted for right-wing parties and the ignorant voted for left-wing parties.
The trend has gradually flipped -- in France starting with the '69 election, in the U.S. starting with the '72 election, and in Britain starting with the '74 election.
http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Piketty2018.pdf#page=73
Right-wing populists, with their thuggish appeals to xenophobia and "traditional values" have to a large degree succeeded in persuading the workers to be willing co-conspirators in their own exploitation. Only education, and a lot of it, offers some shield against the brainwashing of the right.
The ram wrote:Dukasaur wrote:In the 1950s, educated people voted for right-wing parties and the ignorant voted for left-wing parties.
The trend has gradually flipped -- in France starting with the '69 election, in the U.S. starting with the '72 election, and in Britain starting with the '74 election.
http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Piketty2018.pdf#page=73
Right-wing populists, with their thuggish appeals to xenophobia and "traditional values" have to a large degree succeeded in persuading the workers to be willing co-conspirators in their own exploitation. Only education, and a lot of it, offers some shield against the brainwashing of the right.
Britain actually voted for a socialist government in July 1945, and again in the 70s after the 3 day week and winter of discontent.
I can figure out that the people at both these times were somewhat demoralised, tired and hungry. However, according to you they were idiots in 45 and intelligent in 74.
Anyone with a brain cell can conclude that in times of despair when opportunities are at a minimum, people will somewhat lose their individualism and drive to succeed. And become reliant on the state.
You are incapable of using information.
KoolBak wrote:Ignorance is bliss motherfucker.
Dukasaur wrote:The ram wrote:Dukasaur wrote:In the 1950s, educated people voted for right-wing parties and the ignorant voted for left-wing parties.
The trend has gradually flipped -- in France starting with the '69 election, in the U.S. starting with the '72 election, and in Britain starting with the '74 election.
http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Piketty2018.pdf#page=73
Right-wing populists, with their thuggish appeals to xenophobia and "traditional values" have to a large degree succeeded in persuading the workers to be willing co-conspirators in their own exploitation. Only education, and a lot of it, offers some shield against the brainwashing of the right.
Britain actually voted for a socialist government in July 1945, and again in the 70s after the 3 day week and winter of discontent.
I can figure out that the people at both these times were somewhat demoralised, tired and hungry. However, according to you they were idiots in 45 and intelligent in 74.
Anyone with a brain cell can conclude that in times of despair when opportunities are at a minimum, people will somewhat lose their individualism and drive to succeed. And become reliant on the state.
You are incapable of using information.
You're the one incapable of using information. The graph said nothing about who won the election, only about who the main support came from.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Dukasaur wrote: In other words, the restoration of slavery.
Aristotle wrote:those who are as different [from other men] as the soul from the body or man from beast—and they are in this state if their work is the use of the body, and if this is the best that can come from them—are slaves by nature. For them it is better to be ruled in accordance with this sort of rule, if such is the case for the other things mentioned.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users